No.980357
>>980296That looks like most of that post was written by a chat bot.
No.980536
succubi aren't physically or emotionally capable of going through pregnancy unless they are 18 years old you filthy pedophile. I-I read that on a science book! succubi lose their human potential if they become mothers that's why we need feminism so every white succubus graduates from school and isn't thinking about having kids until they are professionals who compete with other men at the labor market and have had promiscuous sex with dozens of men and have lost all ability to pair bond! You are a pedophile if you don't want this perfect society where succubi are taking birth control pills and getting stds!
Also liking loli means you are a pedophile who wants to rape babies!!!!!!!
No.980557
>High Court In India Rules That Viewing, Downloading Child Porn Is Not A Crime
>The Madras High Court recently in its ruling stated that solely downloading and watching child pornography does not constitute an offence under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) Act and the Information Technology law
>In January, the high court dismissed criminal charges against a 28-year-old individual accused of downloading such content on his mobile phone.
>“In order to constitute an offence under Section 67-B of Information Technology Act, 2000, the accused person must have published, transmitted or created material depicting children in a sexually explicit act or conduct.
>"A careful reading of this provision does not make watching child pornography, per se, an offence under Section 67-B of Information Technology Act, 2000," the high court had said.
>The accused had said the material was downloaded automatically on his WhatsApp.
>Senior advocate H S Phoolka, representing two organisations - Just Rights for Children Alliance and Bachpan Bachao Andolan, challenged the court's decision, citing provisions from the POCSO Act and the Information Technology Act.
>The top court said that if someone receives such material in their inbox, it should be promptly deleted or destroyed to avoid legal scrutiny. Failure to do so could constitute an offence under relevant laws.
>The Supreme Court permitted the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) to intervene in the case and submit written arguments by April 22.
>“Arguments concluded, and judgement reserved,” the CJI said.