>If there is someone you really hate, that did something awful to you, I think that you should be able to legally kill them.
Where's the harm in killing somebody that fucked your life? Other people might hate them too, and that means you're doing a public service getting rid of these people. And as we all know, public service is for the greater good, therefore truly good.
I don't see the difference in murdering an animal and murdering a human. I'd never kill an animal personally unless it trying to hurt me so why not applying the same for humans as well.
The state is too biased and slow to take care of these issues. A lot of people suck and they deserve to die, so the world would be better without them. I bet it would feel great.
Also, we all know that most single mothers destroy the lives of their sons, so they should all be murdered as well. The children should also die, so they don't become future inepts. We need to put this planet in order again.
And if you don't know, murder is already legalized, but only for the super rich.
If you have money and are able to find good enough lawyers, you can get away with anything. This is an economic injustice which needs to be rectified. So murder should be legalized so that everyone, rich or poor, can defend themselves against these super rich without being punished.
The super rich should also all be murdered since they are the main reason for wageslavery, which creates worldwide misery. They control the law, so you can't trust in the law to bring true justice.
Oh boy, another hot take LARPing thread.
Interesting position that I don't wholly disagree with, and I had thought about it before, perhaps too many times. The end result of people agreeing on said proposition would inevitably lead to the end of civilization as you would erase the sacredness of human life, and in consequence, we would reverse to cave times, then everything you value and defend would be lost.
What you pretend to achieve is nothing but a disservice to humanity as a whole.
yes but isn't that how society formed in the first place? Like how in the stone age everyone was fighting each other for power and organising into tribes and shit. Your idea would just cause a reboot of the human race pretty much
Societal colçapse is not to be taken as granted. Sure, is an alien concept for us, but it doesn't mean it's impossible.
Allowing murder does not mean creating an anarchy.
It would only mean that people would accept and find moral to two people to solve their dispute without any interference from the state.
Societal collapse is not to be taken as granted.
Is it so hard to imagine that you and your neighbor solving your issues by yourselves without being bothered by the state?
If your neighborhood disagrees with you, they can kill you as well.
That means that it won't become a rampage of murder that will destroy society, because no one really wants to die put their life on the line. Society will still be stable and nurturing. In the end, this basically means more freedom and power to the people.
>>220353>Like how in the stone age everyone was fighting each other for power and organising into tribes and shit.
If that's your point, let me tell you that none of that has changed at all. It only became more complex.
> none of that has changed at all. >It only became more complex.
well, it's called capital punishment for someone collectively hated
Yes. I too beleive murder is sometimes justifiable but to argue for its legality based on “them being a dick” would make courts very messy. It’s sort of like the formality of having a court even when it’s obvious that the person is guilty
Something can be moral without being legal. If you follow your heart and murder people who are fated to die, Heaven will smile on you and allow you to live happily without being shackled by normalfag courts. If you act from an offended ego though Heaven will punish you for telling lies and you will be arrested.
All kinds of intellectual and sexual degeneracy are mainstream right now. Why not allow violence? Seems like the next logical step to me.
Nah, I want to live in a society where I don't have to booby trap my house before going to sleep. I'd agree on dueling laws but not direct killings.
>A lot of people suck and they deserve to die, so the world would be better without them
Some actual harmful criminals are already subjects to capital punishment. If by "suck" you mean people you don't like then the definition is really arbitrary and there is no stopping other people from considering you worth killing because you're a future school shooter who browses the neo-nazi website wizchan or whatever. A society that goes Salem witch trial on everyone they don't like is hell for wizards.
>And if you don't know, murder is already legalized, but only for the super rich.
Good thing the super duper rich who are truly above the law is only like 0,01 percent of society and probably none of us here knows them personally or will ever catch their attention.