[ Home ] [ wiz / dep / hob / lounge / jp / meta / games / music ] [ all ] [  Rules ] [  FAQ ] [  Search /  History ] [  Textboard ] [  Wiki ]

/games/ - Video Games

Video Games
Email
Comment

File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

  [Go to bottom]   [Catalog]   [Return]   [Archive]

File: 1599007309388.jpg (168.27 KB, 2060x1159, 2060:1159, 1599007300226699121041.jpg) ImgOps iqdb

 No.51113

What is your current idea on them? Will you be buying them when they come out?

 No.51114

No I'm fucking broke. They look nice though

 No.51116

I only ever used asus hardware and never switched as it was always reliable
I would be interested in a general manufacturer comparison
>who has the best reliability
>who has the best cost effectiveness long term (does it pay to spend more?)
something like this

 No.51117

I currently have a GTX 1070 so I'll probably upgrade to a 3070 or 3080 soon since I'm already struggling to ruin certain titles at 1080p and maintain a refresh rate above 60hz on high graphics.

 No.51145

What are its tech specs?

 No.51146

>>51145
the lowest tier of this ampere thing beats the highest tier from the previous gen, and is way cheaper somehow i believe

 No.51149

Gonna sell my 1080 while studios still use it as a benchmark, and then buy the 3070. It would be nice to play Unreal games in 4k

 No.51150

File: 1599303228146.png (905.89 KB, 1280x720, 16:9, 1597788682993.png) ImgOps iqdb

Fuck Nvidia for pulling this shit honestly. They were sitting on this technology for quite a while it seems, and because consoles ended up partnering with AMD instead of Intel/Nvidia they now ruined another generation of video games.

I don't see AMD ever catching up now since they're already on ampere architecture for a few years. They'd need to release competition at 200-300 for a midrange and 500 for their flagship that will still only rival a 3070 at best. Fuck corporate greed because it's gonna set us back on good video games for at least another 10 years.

 No.51151

I can't even remember my new one I'm still butthurt anyways

 No.51152

I don't need anything but a 10$ LGA775+c2duo+integrated shitgraphics to watch the same pressX-to-pay-respects movies as you do.

 No.51153

>>51152
Well it's a good thing that nobody in here is talking about playing those types of games otherwise they would be fools for buying such a GPU.

 No.51177

>>51150
AMD is, was, and always will be subpar.
Hardware isn't holding anyhting back. It's already much more powerful than necessary yet games are still shit, and they continue to get worse.
Rising requirements are an excuse. Games aren't getting any more sophisticated. The industry jews offer us the same shit over and over. It's only made more appealing with sloppily applied superficial graphics.
The only corporate greed that's holding anything back is the greed of developers who choose to mass produce easy to make games.
Hardware hasn't been an issue for a decade now because covering dumbed down shit with slightly more polygons and effects isn't going to make any game fundamentally better.

 No.51184

>>51177

But amd always provides best price to performance.

There are tons of high quality new games which will push modern hardware. You just want to fit in.

 No.51185

File: 1599621118782.jpg (158.08 KB, 1080x1080, 1:1, 1599594428198.jpg) ImgOps iqdb

>>Hardware isn't holding anyhting back.
it literally is since 2006 consoles have been struggling running 1080p at 60fps for ages when it was possible on PC already. Even the PS4+ and Xbox right now are just glorified 2nd-3rd gen tech…

We are getting another shit tier console gen that will last another 16 years because normies need gadgets for their 4K TV now.

The ampere gpu's are already stronger than the new consoles coming out, shit is awful.

 No.51186

>>51185
Can someone translate this please? I don't speak nerd.

 No.51187

>>51186
Why are you even in this thread then?

 No.51188

>>51187
I might buy a new gen console.

 No.51189


 No.51190

>>51188
Then this is the wrong thread for you.

 No.51191

Makes me wonder how much cheaper they would be if NVidia has an actual competitor. Nvidia is basically a monopoly, like Intel was.

I remember how Intel's top i9 9th gen XE series processor was 2k$ but after the new threadrippers were released - the i9 10th gen XE series is now 999$

 No.51193

>>51191
>Nvidia is basically a monopoly
Except it isn't in any way shape or form even remotely a monopoly.

And no their situation in the market isn't similar to when Intel was the only game in town when it came to consumer level CPUs.

 No.51194

This changes nothing. 90% of the world are (poor) content with fullhd 60fps and less.

 No.51195

>>51194
That isn't a rational argument.

Most of the world can't afford gaming pc at all, is Asian, and if they game at all probably mainly play on mobile games.

It's like you never heard of Argumentum ad populum

 No.51197

>>51195
what if i meant 90% of the world's PC gamers?

 No.51198

>>51194
huh, what?

 No.51264

>>51113
I will probably (hopefully) get it and put a waterblock on it right away.

But will leave the 2080 ti with air cooler in a second PCI-E slot

So I would do gaming on "ampere" one and use for whatever the second "turing" one

 No.51265

Yeah, just broke one of the wheels on my chair, I will probably get it and tuck there so i can seat properly.

 No.52694

>>51185
>since 2006 consoles have been struggling running 1080p at 60fps for ages
why though



[Go to top] [Catalog] [Return][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ Home ] [ wiz / dep / hob / lounge / jp / meta / games / music ] [ all ] [  Rules ] [  FAQ ] [  Search /  History ] [  Textboard ] [  Wiki ]