>>38030Just to verify that I understood your objection that you announced to the world correctly, you have such a problem with those posts that you felt the need to make an inflammatory post like
> retardasses […] sick, CUMsmelling oogling […] normalfag fapbaitBut if a much younger solo succubus lifts her shirt to show off her underwear
>>35633 as well as the underside of her breasts
>>35618 explicitly for the viewer, or if a group of maids lift their uniforms to show off their underwear
>>35618 explicitly for the viewer, then you have no problem with that, it does not qualify for
> CUMsmelling oogling […] normalfag fapbaitand instead qualifies for
> Something you want to protect, something that brings out loving paternal instinctsDid I understand your objection that you announced to the world correctly?
> probably not even drawn by Japaneses and therefore shouldn't be on /jp/I can help you out with the /jp/ section of the rules page, friend.
< Posts should relate to Japanese culture and media.
Now you know that "drawn by Japaneses
[sic]" is not a requirement for /jp/. I hope you have a good time on wizchan as you spend more time here and become more familiar with the rules of the site.