>>266821>If your choices are not being validated by others, the primate brain starts second guessing itself
Indeed. If others are not validating your nihilism, then you start to second guess yourself, what if I went wrong with trying to kill myself off with heart disease? What if I there really is a difference in what you do in life? The economy is gonna collapse any second now, right guys? Pajeets are taking over software development, you might as well save yourself 10-20 years of working in a DEAD END job. Being fat vs not fat? No difference, just normalfag beauty standards *burp*
We can make these kinds of psychological strawman all you want, but at the end of the day, I don't need social validation to affirm my choices. Apparently, my superior life quality is so self-evident, that I can humblebrag nonchalantly. Of course, at the same time, there is nothing really that enviable about my life, no one actually cares about that stuff, but it's still quite irksome for whatever reason, isn't it?
I went into this thread arguing for the simple principal of "improvement", the banal statement that a better reality is better and logically a worthwhile goal. The implication is that I'm defending wageslavery or exercise (the two horseman of the NEET apocalypse) but I'm arguing for something much more fundamental, not any particular method that claims to produce a better reality.
Basically I'm arguing against nihilism and anti-improvement tards are fundamentally nihilists that believe: (a) there is no difference between different outcomes, and/or (b) you can't influence reality anyway.
These discussions always go predictably in the same direction:
If you claim life can be better, then you better demonstrate with mathematical proof that ANYONE can suddenly have a quality life without any kind of effort or sacrifices or lame shit like that. Either no, there is nothing you can do, or there is, but it requires all this pesky stuff that doesn't make it worth it. Fine, it's your life and I don't care much either way to really prescribe solutions, only talk in general ways.
Your tactic is to throw as much shit as you can on me and see what fits. Never mind that I described working in my underwear and jerking off in between tasks, you still found it relevant to post some video made by normalfags mocking some live-for-the-grind lifestyle. At this point, you're not trying to have a discussion, you just need to get those social validation points online (since you lack social capital in real life) and get people to agree with shitty characterization because it helps you more easily dismiss any pesky second-thoughts about your life. Meanwhile, I went into this thread fully knowing I'm going against the grain and that I wouldn't get the luxury of having someone else validate and affirm my ideas. Do you go into a normalfag club and try to argue for being an anime watching NEET? No, you're gonna hit up the discord and get your pals to milk your metaphorical shaft to completion.>>266823
He's literally baby's first philosopher. Every teenager knows about cynicism and how LAME everything is and how FAKE the adults are while you're a rebel for watching japanese media.