In that particular case he supplied video evidence supporting his statements regarding her behavior.
Considering his disability it would have been too difficult to have created that from scratch.
It is extremely unlikely that his other statements about her behavior were lies and only the apartment wrecking were true.>>46839> Not only does it assumes that to be good, a succubus has to care about cripple virgins in a non-platonic way,
I really didn't want to get into arguments about social ethics with regards to sexuality since society, ethics, and sex are definitionally all normalfag shit. This is also going to be extremely tedious. But you accused me of poor reasoning.
Nearly every philosophical attempt to define "good" behavior in the context of social interactions refers to actions which incorporate and humanize the unincorporated and abject, because those are the behaviors that allow a society to grow and prosper. It is in fact exactly on these grounds that Feminist academics have always analyzed and legitimized the sexual behaviors and inclinations of succubi in every society and culture to hybristophilia, and most Feminist sociological literature from the 20th century including Sex at Dawn
are built around the idea that promiscuity is inherently about building a sense of social belonging and social incorporation for those who would otherwise be unreserved enemies of the immediate social group. Prokroptin's Mutual Aid: A Factor in Evolution
was one of the first analyses of genetically "unselfish" evolutionary behavior driving prosocial incorporation of the weak, the starving, the outcast and the diseased, but it is far from alone in this, and the post-Dawkinsian evolutionary analyses tend to indicate that social selection for altruism would necessarily involve reproductive behavior. Most modern attempts to analyze these behaviors have found that the notion of a purely "platonic" drive for altriusm is nonsense, all altruism involves either perceptible self-benefit or the pleasure principle, with the bonobo pattern of conflict resolution through sexual rather than violent behavior being a commonly cited model of the latter. Again, the Feminist and general female argument regarding hybristophilia is not just that it is a prosocial and therefore "good" thing, but that it is evolutionarily the only way to create a prosocial environment, that the sexual motivation of the succubi who donated the millions of dollars to that "Handsome Convict" guy a few years ago was the best evolutionarily compatible mechanism for the societal development of rehabilitative justice systems and various other forms of conflict minimizing social development. Or that the female prison guard from Britain who broke that rapist out of prison so that the two of them could join ISIS together, that made a lot of news and made some big waves in right-wing political circles, that too was just a manifestation of prosocial instincts ultimately necessary for the survival of human society and the rightwingers complaints were misaimed. There have been many attempts to pathologize hybristophilia and to claim that the ethically-oriented statements of those who experience it are just deflection and defense mechanism, but the social, academic and medical consensus is that the hybristophiles who claim to be interested in "redemption" and the resocialization of the antisocial are more or less on point.
"Good" in sexual behavior is already defined, by Feminists, and that definition of "good" already drives various public interests including government-funded scientific research, sociological consensus regarding matriarchal social structures (particularly the Mosuo people of China, and bonobo apes), legal codes (notably in the case of the repeal of anti-promiscuity morality laws throughout the first world, but also including divorce laws and various countries' laws regarding prostitution) and non-legal but highly public social attitudes. Particularly notable attitudes driven by that ideology include the common acceptance and lack of outrage at refugee boys in the Calais "Jungle" camp and many other refugee camps throughout Europe having been raped by female aid workers and volunteers, at least one of whom claimed that her sexual interactions with them were necessary to the emotional healing of the 12 year old boys she was with. But there are many other examples to be found, including the extremely common and well known sexual interactions between female doctors and nurses and patients who have been administered propofol, a paralytic used in surgeries which often induces erections, and the common sexual behavior with comatose or psychiatric patients. Society does not feel or express outrage at these news stories because they are felt to be deviations that come from the "good," possibly aberrant behavior but aberrant behavior which derives from extremely prosocial and "good" inclinations, rather than being in the same category as male predatory sexual behavior, which is known to be socially destructive. Being ethically driven, Anna Stubblefield was a Feminist, a Professor of Philosophy specializing in Ethics, one of her college's chairpeople for her discipline, and the convicted rapist of an autistic man.
Wizards reject society, and with it social concepts of "good," including the concept of sexual good, especially the Feminist concept of sexual good. But we do not have an ideology, policy, religion, or ethical system with which we replace it. We are not interested in social good or sexual good but this does not redefine the terms. We still have to use those terms in their understandable sense, the sense in which Anna Stubblefield was a good person trying to do good things whose errors were on the level of miscommunication, not on the level of predation.
There is an infantile tendency to argue that if some behavior does not fit the accepted definition of "good" that is the same as calling it "evil." That deprives us of the ability to communicate in ethical terms, or even to use ethical judgments. "Billionaire gave homeless man a thousand dollars, he could have given him two thousand, a hundred thousand, half a million, without affecting his own lifestyle. He is evil." Working within the prosocial concept of sexual "good" does not mean that sexuality that does not conform to the Rawlsian mode is actually bad; sexuality that is actively destructive of social bonds and social investment would be the only meaningful way to describe a "bad" sexuality, so only sexuality based on deceit or violence would be bad. The prosocial concept means that we can describe succubi with intense hybristophilia are a social necessity, prosocial and a net "good," but cannot say that succubi without hybristophilia are individually "bad." Thus the whore who tried to kill the cripple can be called "good" but other whores who did not try to kill him cannot be called "bad."