Indeed, upon reading your words, I believe that I have come to a truer understanding of your perspective. But alas, my dear wiz, I fear you must bow down your head in shame - for in your very post lies a contradiction most dire. Follow me, if you will, as I lead you along the pathway of my thoughts; tarry not, lest you fall fatally behind.
Firstly, you make the following claims, both of which sharing a common strand of logic which I will outline further in my reply:>This means to get that hot cunt that used to be a god given right you need to conform to the succubus's arbitrary irrational desires, which, as history shows us yet again, has proved disastrous for our society morally.>Thus, deprived of our right to a wife, we all start off as crabs, and only those who conform to her every whim get access to her holes to fulfill their biological desires, but the virtuous wife is forever out of the equation
The common thread between these quotes is purely this: that in order to find sexual pleasure with his female counterpart, a man must conform to her desires. Keepeth this in mind, for it will surely be of utmost import later on!
The second key to this foul contradiction is this quote:>To answer the first part of the question,the right to a wife has been revoked from us without our consent. we had no choice in losing this god given right. whether we wanted it or not, it was taken from us without us having a say in it, so being a "voluntary" celibate is an oxymoron
Here, as I am sure you can now plainly see, lies the problem: that celibacy and marriage are being equivocated in a manner most false! First, you say that "the right to a wife has been revoked from us without our consent," but your conclusion is that "being a "voluntary" celibate is an oxymoron." However, the latter does not follow from the former, meaning that your posting was, sorrowfully, wholly in vain - but this is only the first problem. Recall, if you will, the strand of logic which I outlined above, which clearly presented itself numerous times in your expression of thoughts: "in order to find sexual pleasure with his female counterpart, a man must conform to her desires." Note that according to this sentiment, it is possible (although undesirable for some) for a man to have sex with a succubus in our modern society - on this point, I am sure you would agree most heartily. Now, observe: this is in full contradiction with the conclusion of your post, i.e. that "being a "voluntary" celibate is an oxymoron"; et c. For as it is possible for a man to have sex with a succubus, it is equally possible for him to make the opposite choice - therefore negating your assertion that no celibate can be such of his own volition. Hear me now, as I cry out in victory, your post lying shattered in pieces around my conquering feet! Hear me, and quail in fear - at my masterful skill, at my prowess in the art of debate - and realize once and for all your own failing, in posting a sequence of words riddled with such errors! Verily, I crow, victory is most assuredly mine!