I think we are kind of talking past each other at this point. I am focused very specifically on the post mentioned in the OP. If a post crosses the line too far, yeah I agree it should be banned. If there is indeed a culture of normalfaggotry on /b/ (I won't make any claims one way or the other, as I don't go there frequently enough to know about that), then I agree it's a problem that should be dealt with. What I don't agree with, however, are the implications of statements like these:>And you keep bringing up shitposting as if that is a valid excuse. For the last time, you don't need to talk about sex to shitpost.
Sure, you don't need to talk about sex to shitpost. But shitposting about sex (or for that matter, just discussing it) is not a bannable offense
. The rule is "Do not state or suggest that you had, will have or want to have sexual or romantic experiences." Not "do not talk about sex in any context." Yes, it can be a gray area. Yes, it sometimes attracts some undesirable posters. Those can be dealt with on a case by case basis. But I disagree with how loosely you are interpreting the rules, if you believe that the post mentioned in the OP warrants deletion. Frankly it seems as if you are biased due to negative interactions with other posters, who as you said, "write a blog about their sex life, make a few tweaks to give the tone just a tiny bit of a humorous tone." Now I'm not saying that didn't happen. I have no reason to mistrust you on this. But the OP post seems to me, to be a clear-cut case of parody. And I don't see which rule joking about sex breaks.