[ Home ] [ wiz / dep / hob / lounge / jp / meta / games / music ] [ all ] [  Rules ] [  FAQ ] [  Search /  History ] [  Textboard ] [  Wiki ]

/meta/ - Meta

Suggestions and Feedback
Email
Comment
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

  [Go to bottom]   [Catalog]   [Return]   [Archive]

File: 1617817859575.png (56.93 KB, 1250x793, 1250:793, c1.png) ImgOps iqdb

05968 No.58760

Pic related, you can see 4 different IDs.
First is the butthurt faggot who gay roleplays on /b/, streams himself naked, and shitposts everyday, even on /meta/
The other is some random dude gayroleplaying on /meta/ with him.
Third poster wants succubi here and is the guy shitposting on the mainboards calling posters crabs and saying succubi can never do anything bad.
Fourth is some shitposter that says to be a mod. If that's true, then why hasn't he banned the previous posters?

Why have /meta/ if you're gonna ignore the threads? You seriously believe the complaints are unfounded? It's real and you can see it on my thread. The things I complain about are REAL and you take no action.

You don't love anybody but yourselves. Why do you even want Wizchan when you already have your clique where you spend most of your time in?
The reason why avatarfaggin is allowed on /b/ is because the mod is the biggest attentionwhore on Wizchan. That's why he never provided a reason for it. It's all so convenient.
The rules are not enforced and the mods are attentionwhores and liars.

05968 No.58761

File: 1617818318645.png (11.88 KB, 954x158, 477:79, c2.png) ImgOps iqdb

The 3rd poster who wants succubi here is the same guy who hates ugly male virgins and enjoys their suffering, and bypasses the word filters so it's easy to identify him. He is the only one doing this but he doesn't get banned. Imagine coming to wizchan to say that you want virgins dead and requesting videos of them dying.
I reported him back then but the mods never banned him. They should permaban those posters.

bdee4 No.58762

>>58761
What a pathetic cuck

 No.58764

>>58760
In general I don't feel like expressing opinions on /meta/ should be discouraged, even if they are something stupid like arguing about why women should be able to post, that's just someone's opinion and not banning them doesn't necessarily mean I, or any of the other staff, agree with that sentiment. I also hesitate to delete shitposts in /meta/ threads because the shitposter could come back acting differently without the previous shitposts tied to their tag.

Also I'll address the ban status of the "wizfapper"
>If that's true, then why hasn't he banned the previous posters?
He was banned for about 6 weeks, that is the usual amount of time I've given people(yes, this has happened multiple times, with different perpetrators, including with people who are now complaining about him not being banned) for streaming themselves nude for god knows why. Permanent bans are generally reserved for non-virgins and extreme shitposters.

Anyway, these are my personal feelings as of this point in time, I'm open for debate on whatever problems you've got with this style of moderating.

a9500 No.58766

>>58764
>He was banned for about 6 weeks, that is the usual amount of time I've given people(yes, this has happened multiple times, with different perpetrators, including with people who are now complaining about him not being banned) for streaming themselves nude for god knows why. Permanent bans are generally reserved for non-virgins and extreme shitposters.
absolutely pathetic

37cc1 No.58767

>>58764
Mod I shouldn't have been banned at all for wizfapping. I'd like to appeal the historical status of that ban by saying that it wasn't mean to be sexually suggestive and no 3d content was posted on the website. i was even bullied the entire time in the stream and LAUGHED at!!! i demand an apology from the mods saying u temp banned me in error due to pressure from the burgers

864d8 No.58768

>>58764
6 week ban for someone posting a ink to their masturbation stream but a covert witchie gets perm banned if revealed.

How does a 6 week ban actually discourage people from wizfapping?

c4227 No.58769

>>58768
One is someone doing something retarded, the other is someone who is not qualified to post here.

bb4b1 No.58890

File: 1618371429281.jpg (199.71 KB, 1200x923, 1200:923, the-exorcist-1200x923-opti….jpg) ImgOps iqdb

>>58764
> I'm open for debate on whatever problems you've got with this style of moderating.

Your style of moderating is enforcing the rules when you feel like it and leaving faggots like this unbanned >>58767
If you take a look at this page: https://wizchan.org/rules.html
You can see he is always breaking the following rules
Rule 2, 4, 5, 7 and 8.
And that's just one poster, the mods and faggots have been sending each other sexual messages for years on /b/, posting gay hentai, furry, trans pornography, penises, butts, larping as a shota, gay erping, BBC porn, etc. They make sexual threads and sexual posts on a daily basis. They want to fuck each other and express this on Wizchan of all places.
Thanks to you and your friends I have learnt that homosexuals in imageboards are the most sexually depraved people you can find on the internet and will not respect or abide anything except for their fetishes and sexual urges.
If you wanna start with something, permaban the faggot who has proved not to belong here and has no changed after his ban.

6d6f1 No.58891

>>58890
>BBC porn
I noticed a steep decline in this when I started calling out the main culprit of this, eurasiantiger aka Tenda Spencer from Scarsdale NY and formerly NYC.

 No.58897

>>58890
If I was to enforce those rules with permanent bans then you would also be permanently banned as on numerous occasions you've been banned for those same rules, in fact you have an entire page worth of rule 2 and 7 bans. This poster in question gets banned just as you also get banned for nearly the same reasons.

bb4b1 No.58898

>>58897
>If I was to enforce those rules with permanent bans
You should permaban reoffenders, especially the faggots who are constantly sending each other sexual messages everyday, and that you protect so much.
>you would also be permanently banned
Do it then, if I'm just as much of a nonwizard as that faggot and your faggot friends on /b/ in your eyes, and I'm constantly breaking rules by making sexual posts and expressing my sexual desires on Wizchan, denigrating the neets and virgins who come here, not following the rules, then sure, permaban me. In fact, permaban me for any reason you like. I can browse Wizchan just fine. But don't forget to get rid of the faggotry and everything I've mentioned here >>58890
I'd thank you from the heart.

184ff No.58905

>>58761
I hate to be the one to say it but crab != virgin

eb2d3 No.58908

>>58890
A hard ban on any kind of faggotry as gay, tranny freaks or interracial spamming nigger retards would fix > 90% of problems with the site. You give this faggots an inch and they take 10 miles. Anyone who does not see this is part of this disgusting group of "people" or is retarded.

a9500 No.58909

>>58897
Ad hom is not an argument you sniveling nonvirgin female fucktard.

1b219 No.59184

File: 1619509686933.png (10.36 KB, 553x222, 553:222, faggotnigger.png) ImgOps iqdb

>>58897
Stop making up excuses and ban the faggots already.

864d8 No.59190

>>58764
> I don't feel like expressing opinions on /meta/ should be discouraged, even if they are something stupid like arguing about why succubi should be able to post,
Except I got a warning for doing this and do not try to say it is a troll when I have provided evidence to the mods that I am very girly.
I have interacted with one of the moderators last year showing ample evidence that I a, the way I am and others who found my profile I used off wizchan shared screen shots of me which support that I am indeed not trolling and this is truly who I am a wizard that sympathizes with witchies.

The only alternative is that I am some master troll who created an account on a website proceeded to express myself in ways typical of a succubus and waited for madcuck to find said account and share the screenshots abdicating me from being a troll as a ploy to cause more trolling.

Clearly this is not the case so please allow me to discuss my controversial opinions and share my perspective.

12d08 No.59196

>>59190
>I am very girly
>my profile I used off wizchan
>please allow me to discuss my controversial opinions and share my perspective
No, you most certainly need to fuck off back to whatever tranny shithole you crawled out from.

1b219 No.59258

Mod I reported this tranny outsider >>59190
for calling females witches outside of /b/, why haven't you banned him or deleted his post?
>>59196
I reported him, and I think he is the same guy who goes to Crystal Cafe and pretends to be a succubus, and also avatarfags on /b/ with pictures of succubi and says he wishes to be a succubus. I don't know why mods don't ban him.

2c308 No.59260

>>59258
That creature is protected by the moddess team, they themselves are feminists/succubi put into power after the Gaymergate and crab shooters. Speak against that disgusting abomination screeching about "witchies are the real wizards!!!" and you are banned. The irony of that happening on wizchan knows no bounds. Fuck the moddess team.



[Go to top] [Catalog] [Return][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ Home ] [ wiz / dep / hob / lounge / jp / meta / games / music ] [ all ] [  Rules ] [  FAQ ] [  Search /  History ] [  Textboard ] [  Wiki ]