take your pills schizo
cause youre calling everyone a bot for no reason
Yeah I got a 2 day ban for bringing up the tracking cookie fiasco. Not even a conspiracy, a confirmed event in site history. I'm guessing that admin just gave up and now Andrew's free to abuse his power as he sees fit. Nothing else you can think when the people in charge of this place are so intent on keeping their users in the dark.
very cool, informative response. I also love that you post without your mod tag on here like you do on the other boards so that this looks "organic".
I don't understand why power-hungry wannabe internet bullies have such a great desire to moderate this site anyways. Is it because they couldn't get hired at bigger forums? Needed to boost their resume?
>People can break every formally written rule on the daily
No they can't. If you can link any rule-breaking posts, that would be great.
>but nothing will happen
They'll get banned.
>How are you calling me crazy
No staff member called you crazy.
>when you refuse to even allow questioning of your draconian leadership?
We have a whole board made for users to question our draconian leadership.
>Not even 4chan does this fucking bullshit
Out of the 76 boards listed on 4chan's homepage, only about 3 of them allow users to complain about or critique the rules, janitors, or mods
>You shut down any discussion that would foster suspicion
When made outside of /meta/, especially when it disrupts someone else's thread
>here it is on /meta/! That's what you want right?
Yes, that's what your ban reason stated.
>What's your problem with me exposing the truth?
The posts weren't made on /meta/
Really should modify or add a rule saying that site criticism or moderation criticism is only allowed on meta since that actually isn't written anywhere.
For now that is just a rule you enforce that is only written in your head, which comes off as abusive to some users rather then fair.
Then again the FAQ in general hasn't been properly updated in years and it really could use regular updates.
I know the mods probably can't change stuff like that but it is something to mention to the person that can.
>>60129>They'll get banned
cool, then ban yourself and your entire discord mafia. Make all of your posts with your little gay ass mod tag on and I'll gladly link them to you.
You know they won't do that because of the batshit implications it obviously has. They refuse to list it as an official rule because they want the usual wizchan posters to remain complacent. They just use this unwritten rule as an excuse to target wizdissidents that they don't like.
The fact that the FAQ and rule pages are so rarely modified or updated, and there links in the site navigation that are still broken several months later leads me to believe it isn't out of malice but being unable or unwilling to make changes to the site's source code or html in most areas. Even if it's just text edits.
Again, it's not like there is a dev on staff and who even knows what the admin is up to besides paying the yearly hosting bill (appreciated but a occasional update when things aren't going catastrophically wrong would be nice).
Of course due to the near total lack of transparency all we can really do is guess what is going on.
The lack of transparency itself does not seem somewhat suspicious/malicious to you, friend?
Usually site criticism falls under rule 5 (off-topic), if it were a thread it would just be moved to meta
No, it does not fall under that. Thanks for playing.
Suspicious and frustrating yes, malicious no.
you sure know a lot about 4chan