>>60638>I'd argue with this statement.
Happy to see an argument against the statement but sadly all you have done is state things without any reasoning. You should have said you object and not argue against it sincey ou did not argue.>Wizards are either autistic, ugly, homosexual or asexual.
Did not know you were the arbiter of wizards. Where do the rules say you have to be autistic and ugly to be a wizard or even asexual for that matter. Were monks that were virgin from birth but desired sex and fought against the temptation life long not wizardly because they were not ugly or autistic?
You defined normie as meaning anyone not ugly homosexual or a faggot.
Funny that homosexual wizards dont actually exist because they DO desire sex and WILL erp with other faggots unlie true wizards.