/meta/ - Meta

youve provided no examples and on top of that you don't have to respond to every thread. you're just a fucktard.

>>61274
why do you come in every thread and ask for examples? just believe me dude

>>61274
examples? just from seeing it is enough or do you only browse meta

brainfart thread!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>can we do something about these newfags making a new thread for every brainfart as if this is r9gay?

You can!!!!! you can tell them politely why they should make better threads!!!! or [-]!!!!!!
>how are we meant to respond to them?
politely!!!!!

>>61277
Even if you are polite you post will probably get deleted.
Unofficially direct criticism of a threads existence or topic isn't allowed unless the mod doesn't like the topic or person who posted the thread, as they feel it steps on their toes by backseat moderating. Which irritates their ego.

At least that has been my personal experience.
If the mods don't like you you can't say shit about fuck when it comes to threads.
Even been warned for pointing out that a thread was functionally a duplicate of a existing thread on page one and including a link to the other thread.

Simply put the mod doesn't want the users to dictate what level of quality is allowed where. They consider themselves to be the only ones who can do that.