/meta/ - Meta

the person you're referring to is "dojo mutt" aka autism supreme

Do you mean doxing which is already against the rules or do you mean people having a memory and pattern recognition so they can pick up on your posting style?
If it's the first then report them.
If it's the second then stop being so "identifiable" by doing/saying the same kind of stuff over and over across several threads especially not in a toxic or attentionwhorish way.

>>61740
not doxxing, it's as i stated, one poster acting as if they have identified another poster. not about my posts also

>>61755
So not something against the rules even remotely.

>>61757
having pattern recognition skills is against the wizrules

>>61757
you're not a mod

>>61774
Never said I was.
Can still read the rules though.

>>61774
then how did he make this post >>>/games/49792 ?

>>61757
It could be considered a rule 5 violation easily, for potentially being both inflammatory and low-effort, though rule 5 really isn't a good rule to begin with. It is too vague. Why it exists I can only imagine. I could interpret hundreds of not-so-recent posts as violating some part or all of rule 5. I could waste time reporting many of them and it's doubtful any would be deleted. That's my experience, anyway, but I also don't make many reports besides on actual spam.
There are cases where it's probably warranted to call a post out as originating from a routinely obnoxious user, but I can say this is often not what's happening as I have also been accused of being an array of boogeymen when I have never attentionwhored here.

>>61828
The names are for sets of behavior or roles. Not individuals.

Sort of like there have been several boyposters, several people who ape posted, several manbaby posters, etc.
If you are called out for your particular brand of obnoxious behavior then maybe reflect on how you are acting and stop being a faggot.

>>61830
I got accused of being so and so over quite vague posts. The stuff that people conflate with certain personalities here gets very retarded sometimes.

>>61831
Yeah whatever you say Ramenbro. go back to your /test/ thread and put your mod tag on while you're at it. we'll never forgive you for what you did to the home cooking thread 5 years ago

>>61782
and i'm waiting for a mod to answer

i know how discussions, arguments, etc on meta produce nothing

>>61851

/meta/ is just a place for the moderators to laugh at all the butthurt

>>61852
i would rather it stay that way over something more democratic, at least we can scream into the void here