/meta/ - Meta

ok bye

lol that image is giving me flashbacks.

700+ threads on the main boards and you've found 7 with replies that make you think the site has changed for the worst… Small sampler indeed, less than 1% of threads… If you have more examples, then link more examples. You really should because I've read every thread you've linked to and I don't see any real patterns.

>"just go outside bro" tier walls of texts.
Ah, I guess it seems you're angry that people are giving advice on how to potentially be happier. Advice that you don't agree with. Nobody is saying "Just go outside" in any of the threads you linked to. That's a strawman, a gaslight, and a gangstalk even. You're dumbing down your opposition to make a case that's easier for you to argue against. Well, have you responded to those posts and made a case for why such advice is bogus? Just as guys are free to post what they believe to be the best course out of depression, you are free to argue in favor of your own outlets. We're here to discuss after all, not shut down and cancel things we don't agree with. If you want to be able to disapprove of and bury replies you dislike, then go to reddit where echo-chambers are the status quo.

What exactly is bad about people receiving answers along the lines of
>"Things can get better, please don't give up"
>"You can change your body and mind, here's how"
>"Don't make the same mistakes I did"
>"What you're feeling is normal"
>"Avoid drugs / alcohol / therapy scam / etc"
??? OPs can specify if they don't want certain types of responses and none of the threads you linked suggested any desire for such types of posts to be excluded. It sounds like what you want is a site where nobody can really offer help, and all depression-related discussion can only be responded to with "iktf" or claims that there is no hope… Oh wait, you must be one of those "Blackpillers" again, from that crab forum… Figures. Your desire for us Wizards to be locked in eternal despair is laughable and I'll be glad to see you go.

<<<<<<<< Picture of me walking away from this thread, if I was miko of the Hakurei shrine
bottom text

First page of /b/
>circumcision thread
>crab chin aesthetics thread
>thread with /pol/ mutt memes
>gay posting *cums on face* thread
>(neutral shitpost)
>gangstalking thread
>/pol/ feminist comic thread
>trans thread
>/pol/ race thread
>(starcraft thread)

It's just how the internet is going now. There are tens of millions of 4channers now. Millions and millions of these 18 year old who have been living and breathing this stuff since they were 8 years old. There's nothing you can do. You are alone and the tide is rising.

>>62025
>all the copes listed
jfl, you are a delusional fag.got, blackpill is law and you're too special needs to realise that. Normalfags will never accept you.

>they're here for no reason but for the creepy little internet missionaries to fellate themselves on a job well done

spot on
agree with everything you said, though it's naive to expect any better. just cynically assume most here are normalfags and the board is hardly different from other generic imageboards like >>62027 pointed out.

People like OP worsen the site because any time a wizzie gives good advice they claim its bullshit and only works for normies. Which then serves to discourages others from posting good advice or following it. really leading to a site where eventually only losers can or want to stick around.

unfortunately op hasn't figured out that being a virgin doesn't make someone a loser. its a failure to make good choices and grow as a person that makes you a loser. and if you think thats 'culture' we should be proud of you can fuck off, lol.

Make me mod and I will clean all the dirt dropped by the normals in every thread.

You can't expect a good thread when it open with the line
>Zoomer here

What's with "zoomers" and announcing that they are "zoomers" posting on anonymous imageboards? And why was my post removed for making fun of him?

>>62034
It's just a way of generalizing that the guy is currently an adult, but the youngest possible, alluding to inexperience and being raised to the most modern standards. it's a self-deprecating admission of ignorance that doesn't defeat the potential to improve. Age and self-outlook are key things to know when offering anyone advice and recommendations so to open a thread with such info is relevent and helpful.

>And why was my post removed for making fun of him?
If you're here to talk down to men of any age who wish to better themselves, then please just leave. Tribalising yourself in to age groups is the most normalfag thing a guy can do.

>>62035
> thread with such info is relevent and helpful.
It's not helpful and his thread would not have suffered if he had omitted his age
>If you're here to talk down to men of any age who wish to better themselves, then please just leave
Where did OP say in his original post that he wishes to better himself? false accusation. he wishes to better himself by playing games? I don't know about the deleted post drama in the thread I'm merely responding to the OP
> Tribalising yourself in to age groups
Isn't that what he did when he started the thread with "zoomer here"? (zoomer vs boomer dichotomy) I'm a young person too it's not about age but his diction, zoomer is a 4chan/twitch meme if we use the verbiage of non-wizards they will feel increasingly welcome here
Generation Z can be applied to those born between 1997 and 2012 it's likely he is underage

Not only that but there is already a game recommendation thread https://wizchan.org/games/res/39597.html his post is unwarranted attention seeking (something zoomers love)

But his probably one of the moderators sons so it makes sense that people will defend mr. Zoomer here's post

>>62025
None of those greentext example answers are ones that exist in any of the threads OP linked, or any of the threads on /dep/ in general

>>62036
I disagree
>>62037
Any proof?

I don’t see what the problem is, I am probably part of some of the lowest bottom of the barrel losers here, but I don’t want to drag other people down with me, I always hated the subset of this place that wants a race to the bottom mentality of who can be the biggest miserable person

https://wizchan.org/dep/res/257597.html#257761
some really cool posts here on your site, mods who still havent replied.
im just going to assume from your silence that you agree with these posts.
fuck you, bye.

>>62049
>>>/hob/61657
so much for rule 3 lol.

>>62049
This person is a ban evader purposely going around posting stuff like this, please be patient, these types of trolls are difficult to deal with.

>>62050
Picking on a guy going to a chess club of all things is pretty funny.

>>62054
poindexter

what do you expect when every norman, succubus and their grandmas have internet access? this is where they hang out now, see below
>>62025
what you're feeling is normal[\b]
I see what you did there, guess this is the new [b]norm
wizchan has been normalized then :))

Absolutely embarrassing ban.
I appreciate that you guys are trying, but there's normalfags all over the site talking about diet this, "go get a job", "just try harder bro, just be positive" tier retard shit.
and yet they're free to continue, while you ban a guy just for making ONLINE FRIENDS. ONLINE FRIENDS.
OK bro.

the "values" of your site is non-existent. Some normalfaggotry is ok, some is not.

>>62070
>My depression surging back because I couldn't hang out with a succubus from Discord

has online friends = OK
sad can't meet those friends IRL = OK
online friend is a succubus = Trouble!!! no reason to mention the sex of friend.
sad because can't meet the succubus IRL = Bad!! rule 2. Meeting succ is always ban.

>>62070
There's no room for ambiguity when he claims to feel depressed because he couldn't hang out with some succ.

>>62070
That post is horrific and deserved the ban, cry about it though

>>62070
You're a midwit of a child if you think this post is fine. Being this desperate and "depressed" because you can't hang around a succubus? Moron.

>>62070
that post is awful lmao, lurk more

>>62082
how would kids born in 1995 have any media memories of the late 90s?

they would be 4 in 1999

>>62090
yeah its almost as if everything in that image is from the 2000's and not the 90's. retard.
2005 was indeed lit.

>>62070
But… that post literally breaks the rules, are you kidding me?

>>62098
the now deleted meme called em "late 90s early 00s kids"

>>62053
Thanks for replying, even if it wasnt directly to me.
i started feeling better after seeing your reply and seeing some much needed bans handed out.

im back bros

please play turtle wow with us, we're down to literally 2 players.
https://wizchan.org/games/res/56673.html

>>62189
the mods dont like me tho

>>62021
The scenario in this pic never happens irl to subhumans. It's trying to criticise reject genetic defectives with an impossible situation.