[ Home ] [ wiz / dep / hob / lounge / jp / meta / games / music ] [ all ] [  Rules ] [  FAQ ] [  Search /  History ] [  Textboard ] [  Wiki ]

/v9k/ - Dead

Dead
Email
Comment
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

  [Go to bottom]   [Catalog]   [Return]   [Archive]

File: 1589691773569.png (580.66 KB, 464x534, 232:267, roger contemplate.png) ImgOps iqdb

 No.6162

So, many of you probably already know about the branch of science known as “evolutionary biology” and how it relates to this particular subject, I’ll just quickly recap before I lay out the details relating to the current year and gender relations.

succubi sexually evolved to exist in groups with high female/male ratios (in the sexual economy) and to be extremely sexually selective. succubi had to select for both genetic fitness for healthy offspring and to bare in mind the resource acquisition capabilities of the mate in question.

So they learned to associate resources with certain masculine genetic markers of health and fitness (hunter shaped eyes, strong jaw, full lips, healthy skin, high cheek bones, healthy hair etc.) because these were the men who naturally dominated our initial playing field of hunt and gather. So in our initial setting, the most capable masculine men were the most attractive and traits associated with men who displayed these capabilities were ingrained in the female psyche as markers of this fitness and resulting resources. This is why succubi have adopted what’s coined a “dual-mating strategy” in the milieu of civilization. Because intellectual abilities are what get the resources now, but those possessing those intellects don’t, on average, possess the attributes associated with genetic fitness and thus you get “alpha fucks, beta bucks” saying. Mate with the genetically fit men  “settle” down with the dorky guy and maybe he gets to spread his genes too.

 No.6163


Our evolutionary history shows that womens SMV lowered with each male sexual partner she accumulated. In lowering ones SMV, she runs the risk of having 0 access to resources should she lower it to what males with resources would consider 0. This incentivizes succubi to keep their count as low as possible (of course “low” is subjective to w/e the culture deems she can get away with. If she can bang 50 HQ males and still have normal guys lining up to provide for her and her offspring, she’s going to bang 50 HQ males before settling down, if its 100 then 100 and so on, you get the point.)

Studies and recent research show that number of male sex partners diminishes a womans pair bonding capacity (destroys her ability for loyalty to a longterm partner) and significantly raises the chance of divorce with each successive partner after 1 or 2. This encompasses the statistical majority of succubi, unless you believe a high percentage of adult succubi accumulate less than 2 partners before “settling down”. This explains the rise in divorce and female infidelity within modern marriages as I’ll post links for further down.

https://www.livescience.com/55104-sex-partners-and-divorce.html

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/21/more-sexual-partners-unhappy-marriage_n_5698440.html

 No.6164


Microchimerism research shows any succubus who has ever been pregnant by a man will be trafficked from the fetus DNA from that man even if she miscarried or had an abortion. What’s the average marriage age for succubi? Like 27-29ish? How many 28 year olds do you know that have never been pregnant even once? I don’t think I ever met a 28 year old succubus that has not either miscarried, had an abortion, or has spawned some bastard offspring.

https://aeon.co/essays/microchimerism-how-pregnancy-changes-the-mothers-very-dna

 No.6165

The 80/20 rule is born out of the notion that in our evolutionary past most men did not get to procreate. The numbers back this as something like 50% of men throughout history never spread their genes, however this number is bolstered by the institution of religion and marriage as civilization came to be. It is much worse than this without implementing marriage into a society.

https://psmag.com/environment/17-to-1-reproductive-success

(so it was a 17-1 female/male procreation ratio 8000 years ago (holy shit lol), before the institution of civilization and marriage and patriarchy… reeeee!

(I posted a lot of this in reply in another thread so I’m going to bring a few sources into the mix for this post)

It's like this in 2018: succubi have far more STDs than men, at a time when STDs happen to have reached epidemic levels.

(succubi and gay men are the STD leaders by a large margin).

https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2017/p0926-std-prevention.html

https://www.sexualhealth.com/why-succubi-are-more-at-risk-for-stds-than-men_n_1592/

https://tonic.vice.com/en_us/article/xwgbma/straight-men-std-test-recommendations

 No.6166


At the same time “millennials” are having less sex than any living generation (hint this just means men hence succubi have more STDs from cock sharing)

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/succubi/sex/no-sex-please-were-millennials/

http://theweek.com/articles/640671/why-millennials-arent-having-sex

At the same time that most adult men are single and most single men (50% minimum) in their 20’s specifically are polling bouts of celibacy which last 6months-1year+ on average annually

http://stopbetashit.com/?p=158

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ss-sex-than-you-think/?utm_term=.4883b95244b8

At the same time succubi are having more sex than succubi of any previous generation

https://i.redditmedia.com/JqkFqe60H...aj-W7k.png?s=fff0744ed4cfc7ed884d0219d1ee0065

At the same time the marriage rate is the lowest its ever been (don’t really need a source for this the MSM cries about it several times per year lol, it’s the lowest ever and dropping by the second.)

And the birthrate is the lowest in 30 years despite a pretty solid economy (again no source needed for this one, its common knowledge that all or at least 99% of Western nations are experiencing a dipping birthrate that keeps going lower and lower every year.)

 No.6167


At a time when female bisexuality is becoming increasingly popular - lesbian porn is the most preferred for "straight" succubi, for instance, and a majority of succubi report fantasies of other succubi while studies are now coming out claiming that female sexuality evolved to be fluid so that the harem wouldn't fight each other.

https://www.autostraddle.com/60-percent-of-hetero-succubi-are-attracted-to-other-succubi-duh-117238/ https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uk...ither-bisexual-or-gay-but-never-straight.html https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/sax-sex/201004/why-are-so-many-succubi-lesbian-or-bisexual https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2016/05/...sbian-sex-while-half-believe-gender-is-fluid/

At a time when succubi, especially millennial succubi, are reporting much more cheating than they reported before and it even surpasses that of men ( I say “even” because society always tells us that succubi are loyal and men are pigs… lol).

https://www.thecut.com/2017/09/why-succubi-cheat-esther-perel-state-of-affairs.html https://www.bustle.com/p/millennial...han-millennial-men-a-new-survey-finds-7873841 https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/jan/11/millennial-succubi-have-higher-rates-infidelity-mill/

And succubi of all SMV ratings have the same amount of sex, while males have more the higher the SMV. (I can’t seem to find this study at the moment but I’ve seen it posted on this sub a few times). Basically a female 4 will get the same amount of opportunities to get laid as a female 10 while a male 10 will have infinite more chances than a male 4.

And 80% of men are rated below average attractiveness to succubi http://drhelen.blogspot.com.au/2011/06/vox-at-alpha-game-dont-listen-to-female.html

(OKcupid deleted their own fucking study!) https://theblog.okcupid.com/your-looks-and-your-inbox-8715c0f1561e?gi=b3dc39394b0e

Also, males who make less than their female counterparts report having far less sex within a relationship.

https://tonic.vice.com/en_us/article/bjpn84/how-many-americans-are-not-having-sex

I also saw this posted here as well. Tinder came about in 2012, and 2012 is when suddenly female celibacy went to 0% and males celibacy rate skyrocketed (even considering that many males lie on these studies as well and will claim to be having sex to appear cool even if the results are recorded anonymously when they actually are celibate.) https://i.redditmedia.com/VWvRO8fDO...xSnxgY.jpg?s=c2be61f4d1db22769c84ecb148307c8b

 No.6168

File: 1589692199664.jpg (81.34 KB, 782x490, 391:245, rogered.jpg) ImgOps iqdb


 No.6174

What's the point in continuing to talk about this? There's nothing new that can be said

 No.6180

elliot rodger was 6 years ago, and his theories are still being hotly debated

 No.6181

>>6180
I was at an academic conference the other day and I kid you not one of the most well known cosmologists asked the group what we thought of the "Rodger proposal". He was referencing the idea of putting succubi in concentration camps and breeding them in secret so men would never know what heartbreak and rejection feels like. Rodger was a man before his time with his theories.

 No.6182

>>6181
>most well known cosmologists

I thought you were going to discuss Elliot's theory of the universe

 No.6255

File: 1598506073564.png (118.25 KB, 382x189, 382:189, putontheskirtelliot.png) ImgOps iqdb


 No.6419

>>6165
It was more or less due to warfare and patrilineal clans monopolizing succubi

 No.6444

Its funny Elliot Rodger never actually used the term imcel anywhere

 No.6446

>>6444
Not only did he spark the crab movement but YesAllWomen as well

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YesAllWomen#Origin

 No.6539

>>6444
He died before the term crab became popular.

 No.6541

>>6539
he is the cause of it becoming popular

 No.6542

21:13 <@clydeC> YOU WANT A MAN DEEP INSIDE YOU
21:13 <%ChrisChanSonichu> That, sir is INCORRECT.
21:13 <@clydeC> YOU WANT TO WEAR A BRA AND PANTIES
21:13 <@clydeC> OH WAIT, YOU HAVE!
21:13 <@clydeC> AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
21:13 <@BILLY_MAYS> ZING
21:14 <%ChrisChanSonichu> Clothing does not make a person.
21:14 <@clydeC> THAT ISN'T CLOTHING CHRIS
21:14 <@clydeC> IT IS YOUR DESIRE TO BE A succubus
21:14 <@clydeC> THAT IS SHOWING
21:14 <%ChrisChanSonichu> Bras and Panties are considered UNDERWEAR, and UNDERWEAR is a type of CLOTHING.
21:14 <@clydeC> LOOK, I KNOW EVERYTHING YOU'VE DONE
21:14 <@BILLY_MAYS> T-SHIRT = CLOTHING, BRA = FEMALE SUPPORT GARMENT
21:14 <@clydeC> LOOK, BRAS ARE FOR FEMALES
21:14 <@clydeC> SO EXPLAIN THAT
21:15 <@clydeC> AND SO ARE PANTIES, UNLESS YOU'RE GAY
21:15 <@clydeC> WHICH YOU ARE
21:15 <%ChrisChanSonichu> Brief and Boxer = Clothing as well.
21:15 <@clydeC> BUT THOSE ARE FOR GUYS
21:15 <@clydeC> WHICH YOU DON'T WEAR APPARENTLY
21:15 <@clydeC> BECAUSE YOU WEAR PANTIES
21:15 <%ChrisChanSonichu> I have NUMBERS OF PAIRS OF DIRTY, CRAPPED BRIEFS.
21:15 <@BILLY_MAYS> WAIT
21:15 <@clydeC> WHAT? CAN'T MAKE IT TO THE BATHROOM!?
21:15 <@BILLY_MAYS> YOU…. YOU….
21:15 <@BILLY_MAYS> WHAT
21:16 <@BILLY_MAYS> WHY THE FUCK WOULD YOU OFFER THAT INFORMATION
21:16 <%ChrisChanSonichu> at those times, it mostly slipped out without my knowledge.
21:16 <@BILLY_MAYS> OH JESUS CHRIST NO
21:16 <@clydeC> WOW, YOU'RE EVEN MORE PATHETIC THAN I IMAGINED
21:16 <@clydeC> YOU'RE STILL IN THE CLOSET, AND YOU CAN'T CONTROL YOUR BOWELS

 No.6543

>>6542
chris is not the wiz we thought he was

 No.6544

>>6542
>Bras and Panties are considered UNDERWEAR, and UNDERWEAR is a type of CLOTHING.

Have to agree with Chris on this one

 No.6783

>>6162
truly god among men

 No.6789


 No.6960

>make breakfast
>workout
>clean place up a bit
>nightwalk for snacks booze and ciggys
>get crossfaded
>play vidya while listening to playlist
>tfw no gf

 No.7259

The majority of these URLs are dead.



[Go to top] [Catalog] [Return][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ Home ] [ wiz / dep / hob / lounge / jp / meta / games / music ] [ all ] [  Rules ] [  FAQ ] [  Search /  History ] [  Textboard ] [  Wiki ]