File: 1546462341614.png (45.2 KB, 600x452, 150:113, rmet.png) ImgOps iqdb
Anyone else never officially diagnosed with autism? Your RMET score is supposedly a strong predictor of autism. I thought most questions felt impossible but still didn't do as bad as I thought.
Also post your scores if you like.
Also post your scores if you like.
>>153067
Apparently needs a modern browser and a bigger screen. I have neither at the moment. Can you link a plain wiki page with the instructions and questions?
Apparently needs a modern browser and a bigger screen. I have neither at the moment. Can you link a plain wiki page with the instructions and questions?
Your score is 29 out of 36.
Your score is equal or better than 74% of all participants.
I think this test measures your guess work and patience more than anything else.
Your score is equal or better than 74% of all participants.
I think this test measures your guess work and patience more than anything else.
Your score is 28 out of 36.
Your score is equal or better than 64% of all participants.
I don't see any mention of autism (or any other diagnose) in the results.
Your score is equal or better than 64% of all participants.
I don't see any mention of autism (or any other diagnose) in the results.
>>153066
>>153067
I got 33 out of 36 correct, most of the eyes were very easy for me to put to an emotion listed on the side. For a few of the eyes I felt like there wasn't an adequate answer listed to describe them, those were probably the ones I missed. I don't have autism, but I've had doctors try to suggest that I might because I do have an anxiety disorder.
>>153071
>Reading the Mind in the Eyes and Autism. This test was originally developed by prof. Simon Baron-Cohen at the University of Cambridge as part of his and his team's research on autism. Adults with Asperger Syndrome or high-functioning autism scored 22 on average on this test. Again, large individual differences were observed. There is big overlap between the results of typical adults and adults with Asperger Syndrome.
>>153067
I got 33 out of 36 correct, most of the eyes were very easy for me to put to an emotion listed on the side. For a few of the eyes I felt like there wasn't an adequate answer listed to describe them, those were probably the ones I missed. I don't have autism, but I've had doctors try to suggest that I might because I do have an anxiety disorder.
>>153071
>Reading the Mind in the Eyes and Autism. This test was originally developed by prof. Simon Baron-Cohen at the University of Cambridge as part of his and his team's research on autism. Adults with Asperger Syndrome or high-functioning autism scored 22 on average on this test. Again, large individual differences were observed. There is big overlap between the results of typical adults and adults with Asperger Syndrome.
>>153072
>Again, large individual differences were observed. There is big overlap between the results of typical adults and adults with Asperger Syndrome.
Meaning it can hardly be called "strong predictor of autism" as OP claimed.
>Again, large individual differences were observed. There is big overlap between the results of typical adults and adults with Asperger Syndrome.
Meaning it can hardly be called "strong predictor of autism" as OP claimed.
Your score is 30 out of 36.
Your score is equal or better than 82% of all participants.
Though I wonder how I'd have done without the answers right in front of me.
Your score is equal or better than 82% of all participants.
Though I wonder how I'd have done without the answers right in front of me.
File: 1546477066741.jpg (72.36 KB, 640x800, 4:5, scene1.jpg) ImgOps iqdb
OP here. I find it surprising that none of you seem have fallen into the "autism" range for this test.
To everyone who answered before: what do think is the reason you're a wizard, if not an inherant lack of emotional IQ?
To everyone who answered before: what do think is the reason you're a wizard, if not an inherant lack of emotional IQ?
I did above average on it. I don't think I'm good IRL, when I think we're just joking around and people start screaming at me in rage. Thats happened more than once, and is a very autistic reading of people.
Its different looking at it on a screen specifically seeking out emotions.
Probably more insightful than my good score is what I got wrong, which is harmless chads smiling and being friendly, I interpret as aggression and smugness.
Its different looking at it on a screen specifically seeking out emotions.
Probably more insightful than my good score is what I got wrong, which is harmless chads smiling and being friendly, I interpret as aggression and smugness.
>>153078
None of "you", what's that supposed to mean? First tell us your own result and how you explain it.
None of "you", what's that supposed to mean? First tell us your own result and how you explain it.
>Your score is 24 out of 36.
>Your score is equal or better than 28% of all participants.
I live in a country with no white people and I was getting impatient when I was doing the test so it could have contributed to the score. Well, alright maybe I have Asperger's or at least very poor social skills. What a helpful information that I have not guessed before.
>Your score is equal or better than 28% of all participants.
I live in a country with no white people and I was getting impatient when I was doing the test so it could have contributed to the score. Well, alright maybe I have Asperger's or at least very poor social skills. What a helpful information that I have not guessed before.
>Your score is 33 out of 36.
I'm surprised. When I was doing it, I thought I was getting them all wrong. Seems like I'm better at this than I thought.
I'm surprised. When I was doing it, I thought I was getting them all wrong. Seems like I'm better at this than I thought.
>19
the average was 26 and I was clueless for most of the time female eyes were harder to decipher
the average was 26 and I was clueless for most of the time female eyes were harder to decipher
File: 1546570823662.png (13.16 KB, 615x86, 615:86, score.png) ImgOps iqdb
>>153068
So, 404 for every image. For a high reliability test this one doesn't appear too reliable.
So, 404 for every image. For a high reliability test this one doesn't appear too reliable.
32 out of 36.
I think if you're anxious or generally neurotic, you become hypervigilant to people's reactions so you end up learning how to spot even the smallest signs of disapproval. At least in my case.
I think if you're anxious or generally neurotic, you become hypervigilant to people's reactions so you end up learning how to spot even the smallest signs of disapproval. At least in my case.
31
Not the first time ive taken this test but ive always had decent to good results
I wish I were as good in real life situation but I cant stand looking people into the eyes
>>153112
This too
Not the first time ive taken this test but ive always had decent to good results
I wish I were as good in real life situation but I cant stand looking people into the eyes
>>153112
This too
10 out of 36. Nobody looked happy/flirtatious to me, almost every picture looked negative whether it was depression, suspicion, hostility or whatever else. Pictures of succubi were especially hard, most of them looked dismissive or outright hostile.
Never got a mental evaluation by the way.
Never got a mental evaluation by the way.
>>153115
That seems very low, considering the average for high functioning autists is 22.
Is there some other condition you have that would explain this?
That seems very low, considering the average for high functioning autists is 22.
Is there some other condition you have that would explain this?
>>153117
Nothing as far as conditions go,, but perhaps my upbringing and general way of living? Never had a friend, parents barely at home due to work and overall very distant, taught myself to read at a young age and spent almost every minute of free time reading which eventually transitioned to internet forums and video games, not engaging in real life social interaction outside of what was unavoidable like presentations at school or having to interact with family members during holidays. Imageboards and the like don't really help you evaluate mood and emotions from people's faces, so I suppose I just never had any reason nor real opportunity to learn to do that?
Nothing as far as conditions go,, but perhaps my upbringing and general way of living? Never had a friend, parents barely at home due to work and overall very distant, taught myself to read at a young age and spent almost every minute of free time reading which eventually transitioned to internet forums and video games, not engaging in real life social interaction outside of what was unavoidable like presentations at school or having to interact with family members during holidays. Imageboards and the like don't really help you evaluate mood and emotions from people's faces, so I suppose I just never had any reason nor real opportunity to learn to do that?
>>153118
Interesting, so it's an environmental thing. I wonder if that part of your brain is instead devoted to reading emotion/intent from text.
Interesting, so it's an environmental thing. I wonder if that part of your brain is instead devoted to reading emotion/intent from text.
Your score is 33 out of 36.
The average score is 26.
My problem is that I can read people's emotions, I just have no idea how to start/keep a conversation going.
The average score is 26.
My problem is that I can read people's emotions, I just have no idea how to start/keep a conversation going.
Your score is 26 out of 36.
Your score is equal or better than 45% of all participants.
I thought I had done much worse, I guessed through almost every picture.
Your score is equal or better than 45% of all participants.
I thought I had done much worse, I guessed through almost every picture.
>>153078
I have never enjoyed talking to people, I have always felt at unease especially with the opposite sex. did my best to avoid them and it worked.
I have never enjoyed talking to people, I have always felt at unease especially with the opposite sex. did my best to avoid them and it worked.
27. Holy moly, a lot of people looked pretty hostile. The females were really hard actually. I think it's their fake eyebrows, which, by the way, looks ugly now that I see them so close. Ew.
Glad I'm not an autistic person.
Glad I'm not an autistic person.
All succubis' faces are fucking blank. At last I understood the purpose of cosmetics. It hides all real mimics and enables succubi to deceive people with whatever simulacra emotion they want to present.
>>154422
I think 'playful', since his eyes look like he's smiling and they're looking directly at you.
I think 'playful', since his eyes look like he's smiling and they're looking directly at you.
File: 1549395273565.png (169.89 KB, 923x1169, 923:1169, TFWAUTISTIC.png) ImgOps iqdb
>>153066
The only time i see people other than my mom is when i go to college, and even there i never talk to anyone or look at their faces
The only time i see people other than my mom is when i go to college, and even there i never talk to anyone or look at their faces
>>153123
Finally managed to take it and got 29, wonder if it's really my result because I guessed randomly.
Finally managed to take it and got 29, wonder if it's really my result because I guessed randomly.
>>153066
Got 13 out of 36, answered as fast as i could as i feel that otherwise is cheating, because irl i can't really fixate on the persons eye, they might get suspicious.
I also like to remind all that social and emotional"intelligence" is basically useless, iq is like 60% of someone's social and economic status. All of my problems would not matter if i had 30 more iq points. I have 125 and know multiple languages, how to play violin and program besides my all my knowledge about history and science; i simply don't have enough intelligence to create or materialize my many ideas.
I blame my genes and my parents.
Got 13 out of 36, answered as fast as i could as i feel that otherwise is cheating, because irl i can't really fixate on the persons eye, they might get suspicious.
I also like to remind all that social and emotional"intelligence" is basically useless, iq is like 60% of someone's social and economic status. All of my problems would not matter if i had 30 more iq points. I have 125 and know multiple languages, how to play violin and program besides my all my knowledge about history and science; i simply don't have enough intelligence to create or materialize my many ideas.
I blame my genes and my parents.
>>153066
Your score is 31 out of 36.
Your score is equal or better than 89% of all participants.
does that make me a norman?
t. 37 y.o. wizard
get off my fucking board you young whippersnappers
Your score is 31 out of 36.
Your score is equal or better than 89% of all participants.
does that make me a norman?
t. 37 y.o. wizard
get off my fucking board you young whippersnappers
threads like this always make me way angrier than they should
Anyone who puts any faith in the diagnostic power of an online questionnaire like this is a complete idiot
Anyone who puts any faith in the diagnostic power of an online questionnaire like this is a complete idiot
>>154576
It's a task, not a questionnaire.
Ability to perform the task demonstrates some level of ability, inability to perform the task indicates disability.
Autism is a disability, it is a diagnosed inability of the autistic to perform certain tasks because of a specific medical condition. Other conditions are also able to render someone unable to perform those same tasks so a single task check is unreliable, and an autist may be able to perform a task well enough under certain highly specific circumstances but unable to do so under field conditions.
The high scorers can generally throw their scores out, and if that's your point then I agree that this is worthless. But those who found themselves unable to perform the task, regardless of numeric score, may have learned something valuable about themselves.
Those who were "just guessing" like >>154448 or sure that they were correct and finding their performance on the task does not reflect their confidence, have gained something. Not a lot, but something.
It's a task, not a questionnaire.
Ability to perform the task demonstrates some level of ability, inability to perform the task indicates disability.
Autism is a disability, it is a diagnosed inability of the autistic to perform certain tasks because of a specific medical condition. Other conditions are also able to render someone unable to perform those same tasks so a single task check is unreliable, and an autist may be able to perform a task well enough under certain highly specific circumstances but unable to do so under field conditions.
The high scorers can generally throw their scores out, and if that's your point then I agree that this is worthless. But those who found themselves unable to perform the task, regardless of numeric score, may have learned something valuable about themselves.
Those who were "just guessing" like >>154448 or sure that they were correct and finding their performance on the task does not reflect their confidence, have gained something. Not a lot, but something.
File: 1549749335537.png (4.62 KB, 428x98, 214:49, score.png) ImgOps iqdb
>>153112
I agree completely and I got exactly the same score.
I agree completely and I got exactly the same score.
File: 1549750652169.jpg (76.67 KB, 1024x768, 4:3, 1509889272210.jpg) ImgOps iqdb
>24/36
>social intelligence
>This test was developed in Great Britain and the images you saw were taken from British magazines in 1990's. Unsurprisingly, the test doesn't work perfectly for people who are not native speakers of English or for people who come from cultures that are very different from Britain's.
I was trying more to understand the situation instead of the facial features (like why would somone make that face) instead of what the face was. also
?The results of some more recent research conflicts with the theory of universality of facial expressions; these studies found cultural and racial differences in the way people interpret emotion from nonverbal cues. A study conducted by Elfenbein and Ambady (2003) found cultural differences in the way people perceive emotions; people more accurately perceive emotions from the facial expressions of others belonging to their own cultural group. They also found that increased exposure to people of a certain culture increases accuracy in judging the facial expressions of the people of that culture; the study showed significant improvements in Chinese students’ abilities to recognize emotions from the facial expressions of Americans after living in the United States for only a few years (Elfenbein & Ambady, 2003). The results of another study conducted by Wolfgang and Cohen (1988) also suggest that increased familiarity with the faces of people of a certain culture increases one’s accuracy for perceiving emotion from the faces of people from that culture. The study compared the ability of Canadians and Ethiopians living in Israel and utilized a set of 40 facial expressions, 20 Caucasian and 20 West Indian (Wolfgang & Cohen, 1988). The results showed that the Canadian sample were more accurate than the Ethiopian sample in perceiving emotion from Caucasian and West Indian faces; the study also found that the Ethiopians with less exposure to Western culture were less accurate at identifying emotion from the facial expression of Caucasians (Wolfgang & Cohen, 1988). The results of the study suggest that there are cultural factors which influence the way people perceive emotion from facial expressions; however, due to the unequal distribution of sex and academic status among the samples, the results may be subject to biases.
>social intelligence
>This test was developed in Great Britain and the images you saw were taken from British magazines in 1990's. Unsurprisingly, the test doesn't work perfectly for people who are not native speakers of English or for people who come from cultures that are very different from Britain's.
I was trying more to understand the situation instead of the facial features (like why would somone make that face) instead of what the face was. also
?The results of some more recent research conflicts with the theory of universality of facial expressions; these studies found cultural and racial differences in the way people interpret emotion from nonverbal cues. A study conducted by Elfenbein and Ambady (2003) found cultural differences in the way people perceive emotions; people more accurately perceive emotions from the facial expressions of others belonging to their own cultural group. They also found that increased exposure to people of a certain culture increases accuracy in judging the facial expressions of the people of that culture; the study showed significant improvements in Chinese students’ abilities to recognize emotions from the facial expressions of Americans after living in the United States for only a few years (Elfenbein & Ambady, 2003). The results of another study conducted by Wolfgang and Cohen (1988) also suggest that increased familiarity with the faces of people of a certain culture increases one’s accuracy for perceiving emotion from the faces of people from that culture. The study compared the ability of Canadians and Ethiopians living in Israel and utilized a set of 40 facial expressions, 20 Caucasian and 20 West Indian (Wolfgang & Cohen, 1988). The results showed that the Canadian sample were more accurate than the Ethiopian sample in perceiving emotion from Caucasian and West Indian faces; the study also found that the Ethiopians with less exposure to Western culture were less accurate at identifying emotion from the facial expression of Caucasians (Wolfgang & Cohen, 1988). The results of the study suggest that there are cultural factors which influence the way people perceive emotion from facial expressions; however, due to the unequal distribution of sex and academic status among the samples, the results may be subject to biases.
24/36
Thought most of them looked hostile/arrogant. Maybe because I find most normies to be full of themselves.
Thought most of them looked hostile/arrogant. Maybe because I find most normies to be full of themselves.
File: 1550291239975.png (30.03 KB, 948x296, 237:74, assburguer.PNG) ImgOps iqdb
I'm a fucking aspie,now I feel even worse.
File: 1550305894452.png (128.67 KB, 820x608, 205:152, Screenshot from 2019-02-16….png) ImgOps iqdb
File: 1550476168873.png (11.87 KB, 1030x139, 1030:139, snapshot.PNG) ImgOps iqdb
I guess im just a failed normie
>>154801
I'm so aspie so I can blend in and often guess normies correctly. I didn't have a clue, and most of the options weren't what I would pick 26/36.
I'm so aspie so I can blend in and often guess normies correctly. I didn't have a clue, and most of the options weren't what I would pick 26/36.
File: 1551006728821.png (42.85 KB, 875x382, 875:382, Screenshot (4).png) ImgOps iqdb
>>153066
The succubi seem more ambiguous than the males it was difficult to tell what emotions the females felt.
> the test doesn't work perfectly for people who are not native speakers of English or for people who come from cultures that are very different from Britain's.
I'm a Euro-Caucasian from the commonwealth.
> fatigue and many other factors might have affected your score.
Might try it again in the morning I am tried.
I was diagnosed with Aspergers as a kid but I've always wondered if the diagnosis actually fits me in some ways I want to be a sperg so It does not shatter the mental imagine I have of my psyche (I did answer all questions truthfully despite this.)
Maybe with so many people claiming to be autistic on the internet or in real life these days it's messed with my idea of what it looks like to be an autistic person. I believe I am hyper self aware which apparently is not an autistic trait. But I do have obsessive interest, day dream a lot and struggle with eye contact. Maybe a lot of this is from years of absolute loneliness.(was not bullied by others and somewhat accepted the isolation) Does not really matter neurotical and Autism are a spectrum.
The succubi seem more ambiguous than the males it was difficult to tell what emotions the females felt.
> the test doesn't work perfectly for people who are not native speakers of English or for people who come from cultures that are very different from Britain's.
I'm a Euro-Caucasian from the commonwealth.
> fatigue and many other factors might have affected your score.
Might try it again in the morning I am tried.
I was diagnosed with Aspergers as a kid but I've always wondered if the diagnosis actually fits me in some ways I want to be a sperg so It does not shatter the mental imagine I have of my psyche (I did answer all questions truthfully despite this.)
Maybe with so many people claiming to be autistic on the internet or in real life these days it's messed with my idea of what it looks like to be an autistic person. I believe I am hyper self aware which apparently is not an autistic trait. But I do have obsessive interest, day dream a lot and struggle with eye contact. Maybe a lot of this is from years of absolute loneliness.(was not bullied by others and somewhat accepted the isolation) Does not really matter neurotical and Autism are a spectrum.
File: 1554090678587.png (12.61 KB, 767x119, 767:119, 412341241.PNG) ImgOps iqdb
It's over
Fuck
Fuck
Your score is 2 out of 36.
The average score is 26.
I was diagnosed with autism when I was 11 so this is not surprising. This test was quite unpleasant too because I felt like I was being stared at.
The average score is 26.
I was diagnosed with autism when I was 11 so this is not surprising. This test was quite unpleasant too because I felt like I was being stared at.
File: 1554132765295.png (8.21 KB, 414x250, 207:125, face test.png) ImgOps iqdb
57% of the average score, not bad because all the succubi ones were a pair of eyes on empty white picture, zero wrinkles of other kind of facial information to use.
30/36, better than 82%. Interesting, given I have a formal diagnosis on the spectrum. I suspect they don't factor in intelligence coupled with some degree of insanity.
File: 1554830225680.jpeg (65.97 KB, 1349x191, 1349:191, A1E57725-C050-488E-994A-C….jpeg) ImgOps iqdb
Ok, good. This probably confirms my psychiatrist was bullshitting me when she insisted I have assburgers.
Got 34 when I took this test years ago. Down to 30 now. Years of neetism might be the cause.
24 out of 36
Unsurprising. I spend most of my time alone. When I'm out I purposely don't wear my glasses so people faces remain blurred until they are within 7-8 meters or so from me. Also I've always instinctively avoided eye contact. I'm surprised I scored that much actually. Also many of the pictures where blurry and some of the succubi had heavy make up.
Unsurprising. I spend most of my time alone. When I'm out I purposely don't wear my glasses so people faces remain blurred until they are within 7-8 meters or so from me. Also I've always instinctively avoided eye contact. I'm surprised I scored that much actually. Also many of the pictures where blurry and some of the succubi had heavy make up.
>Your score is 25 out of 36.
>Your score is equal or better than 36% of all participants.
There was a lot of them, especially the ones with female eyes, where I would have guessed completely differently from any of the 4 options
>Your score is equal or better than 36% of all participants.
There was a lot of them, especially the ones with female eyes, where I would have guessed completely differently from any of the 4 options
I got 31.
I have been wondering if I could be on the autism spectrum but think it more likely that I have something like avoidant personality disorder. I believe it is silly to medicalize personalities though.
I have been wondering if I could be on the autism spectrum but think it more likely that I have something like avoidant personality disorder. I believe it is silly to medicalize personalities though.
File: 1555335334337.png (159.95 KB, 540x960, 9:16, Screenshot_2019-04-15-15-3….png) ImgOps iqdb
21 of 36
Plz kill me
Plz kill me
I got 21/36. I had the feeling that the eyes of the succubi were a joke. At least for me they were impossible to decipher. So I had a lot of random guesses. If I assume that I was sometimes correct with my random guesses then my actual score is lower.
I mean it is possible to get a score below 9, but if the probabilty to get the right answer is 25% then the expected lowest value is 9. Also I don't know what my score really means. I found nowhere the quantile to compare myself. But reading through the posts here I assume 21 is rather low.
I mean it is possible to get a score below 9, but if the probabilty to get the right answer is 25% then the expected lowest value is 9. Also I don't know what my score really means. I found nowhere the quantile to compare myself. But reading through the posts here I assume 21 is rather low.
33
A couple of the words they chose were close to synonymous sometimes. It's a really vague test, I had no idea if I was getting the answers right or not while doing it.
A couple of the words they chose were close to synonymous sometimes. It's a really vague test, I had no idea if I was getting the answers right or not while doing it.
Your score is 11 out of 36.
Not surprising, I've been clinically diagnosed as long as I can remember.
Most of the succubi eyes looked vacant to me, honestly.
Not surprising, I've been clinically diagnosed as long as I can remember.
Most of the succubi eyes looked vacant to me, honestly.
I got a 12, but in about half of them the emotion i saw way not one of the ones listed so i just had to choose one. Also anyone find they where better at reading male vs female faces? All the female faces looked the same and they almost all had the affectionate option. I unironically have no reference for what that looks like.
35 out of 36. I guessed on one of the answers since none of them really fit, but otherwise it was a breeze. That being said, reading people is easy since people are stupid and the things they do are very obvious, like when my mother used to scrunch up her whole fucking face the moment she felt an ounce of any kind of energy. Makes me want to fucking slap somebody.
>Your score is 35 out of 36.
I got the same kind of score when I did it the other year. I'm more schizophrenic/disordered mind than autistic. I still can't interact with people but it's not because I can't read them.
I got the same kind of score when I did it the other year. I'm more schizophrenic/disordered mind than autistic. I still can't interact with people but it's not because I can't read them.
File: 1567902204254.png (49.13 KB, 1016x233, 1016:233, 2019-09-07 202137.png) ImgOps iqdb
>>153066
What the fuck? 19? I don't think I have autism…
What the fuck? 19? I don't think I have autism…
>>153066
I got about 28/36, but for most of them there's no way I would have chosen any of those 4 words or even emotions close to them if I had been able to make up my own
I got about 28/36, but for most of them there's no way I would have chosen any of those 4 words or even emotions close to them if I had been able to make up my own
>>160179
Also I was actually diagnosed with autism as an adult, for what it's worth. I'm just very good at doing tests. It's more that there was always one word which seemed to be not like the others and less that I could determine the emotion in the eyes.
Also I was actually diagnosed with autism as an adult, for what it's worth. I'm just very good at doing tests. It's more that there was always one word which seemed to be not like the others and less that I could determine the emotion in the eyes.
Got 25/36
I expected it to be lower considering for a lot of eyes i didn't think any of the words matched and i just picked the closest to what i thought it would be
I expected it to be lower considering for a lot of eyes i didn't think any of the words matched and i just picked the closest to what i thought it would be
22/36
Naturally saw all the female eyes as suspicious and hostile.
>British magazines of the 90s
>Flirtatious, endearing, and other positive things were probably the "correct" answers for all the succubi
Normal test for normal folk. Don't let it reaffirm any suspicion you may have that you're not just as capable (or better) than the average person at problem solving. The ability to tell the expression that random, makeup-covered models from 25 years ago are being payed to convey by just seeing their colorless eyes is no indicator of intelligence, but instead only a slight sign of how indoctrinated one has become in to a system in which you are expected to relate to the artificial feelings of artificial people. Bored housewife tier sensationalist nonsense for them to share their scores on facebook.
Naturally saw all the female eyes as suspicious and hostile.
>British magazines of the 90s
>Flirtatious, endearing, and other positive things were probably the "correct" answers for all the succubi
Normal test for normal folk. Don't let it reaffirm any suspicion you may have that you're not just as capable (or better) than the average person at problem solving. The ability to tell the expression that random, makeup-covered models from 25 years ago are being payed to convey by just seeing their colorless eyes is no indicator of intelligence, but instead only a slight sign of how indoctrinated one has become in to a system in which you are expected to relate to the artificial feelings of artificial people. Bored housewife tier sensationalist nonsense for them to share their scores on facebook.
>>163046
face blindness/autistic symptoms in reading intentions in the eyes of people has nothing to do with problem solving or intelligence and the test wasn't claiming that to begin with
face blindness/autistic symptoms in reading intentions in the eyes of people has nothing to do with problem solving or intelligence and the test wasn't claiming that to begin with
>>163047
It is problem solving
>I don't know what that person's intentions or feelings are
>this is a problem
>I can solve it by studying their eyes
problem solving
It is problem solving
>I don't know what that person's intentions or feelings are
>this is a problem
>I can solve it by studying their eyes
problem solving
>>154384
Yep, same here. I got 29 out of 36 and am also a diagnosed autist who hasn't met with or spoken to anyone, beyond my parents, in close to 13 years. Even so, outside of the female faces, most of the answers seemed fairly obvious to me. Not sure how well I'd fare with this test if taken in real life, but I guess it would depend on how subtle or overt the expressions were. Some of the ones in the test I just had to guess at, since none of the descriptions seemed to fit what I thought they should be.
Yep, same here. I got 29 out of 36 and am also a diagnosed autist who hasn't met with or spoken to anyone, beyond my parents, in close to 13 years. Even so, outside of the female faces, most of the answers seemed fairly obvious to me. Not sure how well I'd fare with this test if taken in real life, but I guess it would depend on how subtle or overt the expressions were. Some of the ones in the test I just had to guess at, since none of the descriptions seemed to fit what I thought they should be.
File: 1577674846056.jpg (7.3 KB, 500x200, 5:2, loltismhd.JPG) ImgOps iqdb
>>163051
sometimes you never know how much you needed something in your life until it happens
sometimes you never know how much you needed something in your life until it happens