They'd just need a one-time $2k payment to get all the undesirables to agree to it.
I would not out of principle. Otis however a pretty good deal.
That should have been the case a long time ago.
Expecting people to support civilization without any reward whatsoever is definition of slavery, if anything it's even worse now than being a POW slave back in the day.
fear of the unknown and pain is all the encouragement you need
Absolutely. Even if I weren't a wizard, I wouldn't want to bring someone into this abysmally shitty hellworld.
But I already get about $1400/mo in neetbucks. So I would gain almost nothing from that deal
2k/month is ridulously high
do you know how many hours of hard work on shitty jobs it would take to earn that
i would let them do whatever the fuck they want to my genitals for that much every month
Minimum wage job in a lot of countries get that much.
Yeah it seems like a fair trade, an ideal balance between humaneness and dysgenics. Provide for the inferior while they are alive, but ensure their DNA has no future.
You have all these genocidal regimes who have tried to torture and exterminate the untermensch into not existing. When you could just humanely let them live out their neet lives with no offspring, and accomplish the same goal of the total elimination of their genes
Becoming homeless seems like a better idea.
This. It's the only form of welfare I can think of that doesn't end up creating a despondant welfare class which has future generations stuck in welfare as well.
It's not like previous sterilization plans which were compulsory sterilization and specifically targeted certain races.
Better yet, if some succubi shows up to give birth and clearly doesn't have the means to take care of the child, you give her and the father norplant/vasagel. Stop this insanity of dozens of children living in poverty and perpetuating this ridiculous cycle of poverty, abuse, and dysgenics.
The Chinese were spot on with their one-child policy.
Yea, I'd do it for just 200 bucks a month
Let's say the labor market was the criterion for eugenic selection, as you and the OP appear to be suggesting.
In the realm of human creativity, such as science, literature, art, and mysticism, novel developments have primarily been led by NEETs. To me a life well lived is in this creative realm, and not in perpetuating a particular mode of production like agriculture or industrial society. There is a kind of eugenic selection I can imagine but it's not what the employment market currently values, which has arguably had dysgenic consequences.
It seems to me if you wanted humanity to escape bovine mediocrity, and accelerate human evolution, you would select from the highborn caste of NEETs and not from the servile herd of ragie wagecattle. Don't you agree?
>>185712>In the realm of human creativity, such as science, literature, art, and mysticism, novel developments have primarily been led by NEETs
that's not who the term NEET is used to describe
why only males, simp?>>185690>>185690
You can be a NEET and do all of those things. Is the NEET who shitposts not a true NEET?
you twist the meaning of the word NEET to make yourself feel better about being a NEET.
What do you think NEET means?
You can be all those things whilst a NEET if you are doing it for the love of it and not within any institution.
by your logic just writing poetry excludes the NEET from being a NEET
>>185718>in the realm of human creativity, such as science, literature, art, and mysticism, novel developments have primarily been led by NEETs.
Delusional people sugarcoating the word NEET to not accept the harsh reality and feel better with themselves.
Only a retard would use neet to encompass genius scientists or artists who worked on projects because they were merely unemployed at the moment. Like there's no difference at all between an imageboard neet or homeless person and them.
By analogy I think it would be good if voluntary suicide would weed out the depressive gene, even if those depressive people did have creative talents that were of use to humanity.
I never claimed all NEET were genius that was all you.>>You can be a NEET and do all of those things.
was what I said.
You obviously dislike NEETs or something
You clearly don't know what that poster is trying to convey when referring to geniuses and inventors as NEETs.
>>185712>It seems to me if you wanted humanity to escape bovine mediocrity, and accelerate human evolution, you would select from the highborn caste of NEETs and not from the servile herd of ragie wagecattle. Don't you agree?
I'd imagine this policy would hit–in terms of nominal and per capita figures–the normies the hardest.
yeah minimum wage fucking sucks ass. so many hundreds of hours per month of shit work… equals simply having balls sterilized? that's absurd to me. super good deal for poorfags
Absolutely! I've got no reason to want kids.
I make money by donating sperm so no
Well however nice it is to fantasize about, its one proposal that is impossible to imagine happening. to one side it is nazi eugenics. And to the other providing a full salary to good for nothing lazy loafers. Hard to think of any proposal, in this polarized age, that would be seen as so bipartisanly devilish from both sides of the political spectrum. Rather than a basis of compromise, it is the nightmare vision of what both sides see as most evil.
No. It would make me too bullish on the price of unvaccinated sperm. Governments having such policies makes it more likely that the covid vaccine will have intentional consequences on sperm quality