[ Home ] [ wiz / dep / hob / lounge / jp / meta / games / music ] [ all ] [  Rules ] [  FAQ ] [  Search /  History ] [  Textboard ] [  Wiki ]

/games/ - Video Games

Video Games
[]
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

  [Go to bottom]  [Catalog]  [Reload]  [Archive]

File: 1688674080546-0.jpeg (267.8 KB, 2048x2048, 1:1, D5F74069-9165-4293-AC07-6….jpeg) ImgOps iqdb

File: 1688674080546-1.jpeg (34.5 KB, 300x233, 300:233, EB5D2899-DBB5-4B9C-AC5D-4….jpeg) ImgOps iqdb

 No.60310[Reply]

What is the largest spherical (or oblately spheroidal) open world map ever designed for a video game?

The other day I was thinking, "what if there was a Grand Theft Auto game set on a spheroid with fictionalized versions of at least one real major city from every continent?"

Has there ever been a map that could be fully explored on foot, maybe something along the lines of: GTAV's flat map, or maybe even more like on the scale of World War II Online's map, but with no invisible walls or any artificial method that prevents players from crossing a certain boundary that would reveal the flatness of the virtual world?

I was also thinking something like No Man's Sky but wasn't procedurally generated, had more than just one biome, was set in the present, had Earth fauna and flora, had thousands of NPCs, and cities based off of real-world cities.

The map would have to be a lot smaller than real Earth, of course. Perhaps a spheroidal map the size of Ceres? Or smaller. No wait. Not Ceres. Maybe the asteroid 8 Flora. Might be just perfect for the GTAV map.

Has there ever been a spherical open world game set inside a space station on the scale of something like the Death Star that could be fully explored inside and out?

Or an oblately spheroidal open world set inside of a hollowed-out asteroid?

Or for that matter: how hard would it be to just take the flat map from GTAV and paste it onto a globe?

I'd love to play a GTAV-like game in which the map isn't flat and has multiple biomes (e.g. jungles, tundras, taigas, steppes, dunes, permafrost locations like McMurdo station, etc.) and fictionalized versions of real major cities from all over the planet and not just Miami, New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, London, and Las Vegas.

Is there such an open world game?
2 posts and 3 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.60316

>>60315
you can't just wrap the map around a sphere, the coordinate and positioning for everything would be all fucked up, everything instead of being universally oriented to xyz axis now must relatively orient around and on the surface of the sphere

the easiest thing you could do is just use a sphere shader to obtain the look of a spherical world without any of the ass pains. but this introduces errors in how the world is rendered such that space or hgih altitude things arent viable (things become huge the further away from the center of the sphere). you arent the one doing any of this though so you will dismiss anything i say, if it's possible surely someone will do it… is what you think

i dont see the reason for doing any of this. sure it would be cool to have an entire simulated planet with atoms and molecules, it would be cool to have millions of things. you have to convince people to build it though

 No.60319

File: 1688703468312-0.jpeg (98.77 KB, 578x767, 578:767, 0AC3A4D3-D350-4A96-A3FB-D….jpeg) ImgOps iqdb

File: 1688703468312-1.jpeg (383.67 KB, 1600x1599, 1600:1599, 70FB3A68-D0D9-4CAB-842A-F….jpeg) ImgOps iqdb

>>60316
Not sure if this counts, but I also found this other guy on Youtube who created some sort of flight timed package delivery sim game by taking imagery from Google Earth and running it through Unreal Engine 5. Of course, he had to shrink the Earth to make one side of the globe reachable from the other over the course of a few minutes on a biplane and make all the planet's features cartoonishly semi-realistic, but it still looked pretty good. I was thinking of something like that but at ground-level. Obviously not fully-simulated Earth, but something possible with current technology.

 No.60320

File: 1688719783556.png (1.42 MB, 1200x960, 5:4, A6E6024F-3DCE-40ED-A15F-05….png) ImgOps iqdb

It also bothers me how Civilization maps still seem to be flat or cylindrical and don't allow players to cross the poles from one hemisphere to another.

Would be neat to be able to fly over a shrunk-down version of Antarctica from not-Brazil or not-Argentina, maybe land on a fictional recreation of McMurdo station, and then take off and travel to not-Australia in a GTA clone.

 No.60322

it would take too much processing power and ram to run such a thing, it is basically impossible, if it was done right now then the environments would have to be low quality and empty, probaby also massively scaled down

 No.60325

File: 1688756655966-0.jpeg (1.23 MB, 1536x1611, 512:537, 71E37AA7-418C-49BA-B4A7-5….jpeg) ImgOps iqdb

File: 1688756655966-1.jpeg (1.35 MB, 1496x1571, 1496:1571, 21650AF8-6CE0-4A6D-9A5C-E….jpeg) ImgOps iqdb

File: 1688756655966-2.jpeg (1.34 MB, 1955x1101, 1955:1101, BC32BFDF-D6B3-4640-9241-8….jpeg) ImgOps iqdb

>>60322
Someone could probably steal the source code of No Man's Sky and manipulate it into procedurally-generating at least one planet that uses the Hollow Earth model which would allow one being able to walk along the edges of the holes/tunnels at the poles leading back and forth both the inner and outer shells of the world. The game could effectively have two fully-explorable open worlds in a high fantasy/science fantasy type of setting.



File: 1686473204431.png (1.07 MB, 1157x651, 1157:651, ClipboardImage.png) ImgOps iqdb

 No.60122[Reply]

Not jumpscare horror, but actually well-written dark or weird games. What are some you like?
6 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.60221


 No.60223

>>60215
I haven't been able to figure Cultist Simulator out. If it's just an alright game then all it has going is the atmosphere and writing of the Sunless Skies guy, which I do enjoy.

Is there other stuff with that Lovecraftian, kind of humorous but still fucked up type of writing?

 No.60225

>>60223
>The title makes it sounds like it's one of these garbage cheap meme things
this is such a stupid name for any game that is not a dumb gmod-like shovelware for streamers or an actual niche german work thing
i automatically dismiss anything on that basis and i am sure i am not the only one

 No.60239

>>60223
Book of Hours by the Cultist Simulator people is coming out in August. Same setting as the previous game, other than that I haven't read much about it. Looks like a puzzle/light RPG mix.

 No.60305

>>60136
you should try Tension (original) from the same devs. Tension The Void sucks, they made it linear and cut off all the dialogues.



File: 1623367901526.jpeg (174.58 KB, 800x600, 4:3, battlefield 2042 pic.jpeg) ImgOps iqdb

 No.53688[Reply]

does anyone think that this game is going to be a garbage fire like battle field 5
45 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.59542

BF5 was not trash, gamers were only against it because of gamergate whining. It is the most beautiful immersive game I've ever played. Yeah it allowed some white German succubi with tasteful 1940s hairdos to be Nazi soldiers. Its not a textbook. No it didn't have black succubus nazis like COD WW2.

you don't like that? well you got what you wished for in COD Vanguard, with no Axis faction at all. Just allies vs allies having a soccer match.

But BF5 is the greatest game for feeling like you're in an epic battle, WW2 or otherwise. Like BF1 might be easier to play. But BF5 is the most immersive and cinematic. Like those Pacific islands, I could just wander it appreciating the beauty, amidst the death of battle.

But the Euro front wasn't bad either, it was what its like to be on the receiving end of Blitzkrieg. And focusing on UK vs Ger 1940, was a fitting sequel to the settings of BF1.

 No.59553

>>59541
>I've tried aimlab, and it felt more like work than fun
Facts

 No.59579

>>59542
They're against it because it's obviously feminist tainted trash, if that's what you mean by "gamergate whining" eg just having a backbone and not taking it up the bum from companies that disrespect you, twisting history (nu shartfield games purport themselves as historical) to appeal to people who don't play games. If this annoys them on a historyfag basis, there's no way these same people appreciate vanguard having no factions, you aren't making much sense.

 No.59847

now people are saying its better than COD

 No.60275

>>59847
I think the developers of BF2042 made it suck on purpose, to let the management know that if their requirements wont be fullfilled, whole company can go to hell without programmers



File: 1687595185695.jpg (54.17 KB, 850x531, 850:531, desktop-wallpaper-jade-emp….jpg) ImgOps iqdb

 No.60208[Reply]

2000s Bioware made the best RPGs in the history of the genre. No, they're not crunchy. No, they're not infinitely replayable. But they were memorable, meaningful, evocative, and fun.

 No.60212

mass effect 1 was awesome. mass effect 2 was a weird cover-shooter shaped so heavily by the current era of fps console gaming, all the rpg stuff was gone which sucked. still need to play 3 and beyond

i really hate in first dragon age how everything just plays out all together at once it's so chaotic and makes being tactical difficult. the first fun memories of that game by the way are when important people join your party. i would always strip them of all their gear expectign them to die or be removed from my party. so my early battles in that game were as a bunch of naked bandit beating up low level monsters

bioware was fun that's for sure

 No.60224

File: 1687658954182.jpg (57.05 KB, 1280x720, 16:9, maxresdefault.jpg) ImgOps iqdb

>>60212
I tried to replay Dragon Age Origins recently and it doesn't hold up. It's just repetitive and like you say, the early battles got tiresome fast. I like the writing though, it has all the Bioware 2000s hallmarks.

KOTOR is of course the standard-bearer of all this. That they had to go into MMO bullshit direction with that still annoys me.



File: 1663681351825.png (603.94 KB, 712x948, 178:237, 3ef3k8fhh.png) ImgOps iqdb

 No.58457[Reply]

Do you think it will be good or a ruin like 3?

The setting will most likely be 1920s - 1930s, and the story will follow Sallieri's life. I really hope that will be the setting, mafia 3 was set too far in the future.
2 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.58460

>>58458
i don't think there is anything official yet, except that they are making a new game

 No.58477

Is 3 that bad? I remember liking 2, and everyone hated that game

 No.58553

>>58457
I wish they would make a game set in this setting, but instead play as bootleggers in the boonies driving souped up stock cars to outrun the feds.

 No.60111

I like the first two games. Is Mafia 3 really that bad?

 No.60217

>>58477
Never played 3 but I was one of those who hated 2. One of these games where the open world felt forced and empty, it had no reason to exist. I felt it was a nuisance that fucked with the pacing of an otherwise very linear game, already a quite slow cover based shooter.



File: 1679840130686.jpg (132.21 KB, 1200x1200, 1:1, 20210115_112943-scaled.jpg) ImgOps iqdb

 No.59700[Reply]

I have been debating if I should get a GameCube or not. I have seen a few good gems on the system but a friend of mine told me not to bother because it's extremely expensive to get the system and some games he said. Is that true or not.
17 posts omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.59793

>>59792
It really is a great game, I've spent hundreds of hours on the multiplayer doing coop and that part is better than goldeneye anyways. The missions… not so much. The castle level was great but after that I felt like it dropped off and became rather linear

 No.59794

>>59792
>>59793
The Gamecube Era 007 games were great. Loved the driving segments.

 No.59899

>>59700
Maybe one day.

 No.60074

>>59700
the last good nintendo console to be made. after this I can't see why anyone would buy anything nintendo made especially considering the awesome current state of emulation.

 No.60076

>>59700
unless i just missed out on all the good games the gamecube is not worth buying for the games alone
the games i played:
Star fox adventures
Spiderman 2
Smash bros: melee
mickey mouse game
mario party 5
mario strikers
luigis mansion
godzilla: destroy all monsters: MELEE
i think i had a digimon game at one point
a power rangers one too
Peter jackson's king kong
monkey ball
teenage mutant ninja turtles
and ones that are so insignificant i don't even want to post them

I had a gamecube setup and i only occasionally played a few games just out of intrigue and not much of it really holds up to me. basically what >>59702 said. I played star fox adventures a bit because i like the aesthetic of the game, liked king kong and i would say it's worth buying just for luigi's mansion but good luck finding a copy

honestly i have 100x more fun replaying the shit out of gears of war on the xbox 360 then i do any of the gamecube games. the gamecube is nothing but a feels machine whether its the mysterious and soothing menu screen or the small bits of nostalgia i get from a bygone era.



 No.60057[Reply]

A new dragon's dogma will be released, what are you thoughts on it? expectations? fears?
For what I saw in the trailer, they wantes to make everything works so it will be super fluid but alas, the graphics don't catch up. (maybe with DD III or in a new generation).
I already played DD I but didn't like it. I hope the second one will be enjoyable

 No.60058

Will it have actual multiplayer? Don't remember where I heard it, maybe from someone here, but they said it was a salvaged MMO project. The way everything was designed, it really does seem that way. I didn't hate the game, but it wasn't anything special (though I think actual multiplayer would have made it a great experience). There isn't anything that would play quite like DD multiplayer that I know of. Vermintide seems more like Left 4 Dead or Deep Rock Galactic and open-world sandboxes don't really feature traditional classes, if they feature classes at all.

I played whatever that class was that maintains a weapon enchant and conjures then repeatedly smacks a large magic orb like it's a baseball so that it pelts enemies in front of you with tons of smaller orbs. Was really satisfying. Before that I played whatever the climbing class was. It was also decently fun to climb large enemies and stab their eye sockets or whatever miscellaneous weakspot they possessed.

 No.60059

dragon's dogma was awesome. i played in 2016 or 2017 for the first time and had a blast. i did not do any of the expansion stuff, wasn't interested. i thought the pseudo-multiplayer pawn system was dumb (reminded me of nintendo style online systems that are handicapped to the point of being suitable only for dumb babies). i liked the combat and the story, so a second dragon's dogma that provides nothing else but the same combat + new story would satisfy me

i hope for dd2 we are able to play as pawns for friends online, that's really my only wish. i'd like to play cooperatively with my brother



File: 1662399763081.jpg (479.24 KB, 1920x1080, 16:9, ss_820965eebb8130d7a44f7f9….jpg) ImgOps iqdb

 No.58213[Reply]

I want to share one of the best games I've ever played in my life, not only because of its aesthetics, but also because of its playability and the great content it offers, not only that, apart from being very accessible despite having low graphics (not to say shit) Runescape old school is one of those games that are little known, this game contains millions of stories, of Venezuelans earning a living to be able to eat selling runescape gold, from people who repeat the same action for 3 months in a row to be able to get 99 in a skill, and even people who pay in-game money so they can have a girlfriend. Runescape is huge and you don't stop finding new things every day, it's full of content and besides it's FREE… Up to a certain point since you can buy a membership and play the game 100%, since the free game is limited to certain things and certain sectors, but don't worry you can farm money from the game and buy a bond, which gives you 14 days of free membership, and if you know how to take advantage of them you will never have to spend real money to buy the membership. It's crazy what this game can be and I invite you to play it for free on steam, android, and iso. I don't know what my fellow virgins expect to be able to play this fantastic game
26 posts and 3 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.59741

dude stop crashing me!!!

 No.59946

i wanna play runescape again but i gave away my entire bank so i have no idea how to get a bond again. ive been mining runite in free to play and only made like 2m.

 No.59947

Here's your RunEscape, bro

 No.59948

>>59947
Yeah, and? What's funny is I got a dragon med helm from the Odd-One-Out mystery box.

You losers could play this little direct RS clone that I linked. It has no players so you can grind your lives away into nothingness without competition.

 No.59959

>>59947
is this that runescape classic-esque game that someone was making a few years ago?



 No.59934[Reply]

You might not like it, but peak wizardry is to play on your mobile phone on the train.
What games do you play on your portable telephone
Bonus points if you don't got any phone
2 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.59938

>>59937
>i'm afraid people will make fun of me
Very unhealthy. There's no reason to expect anyone will make fun of you, and even if some vapid schizonigger does, there's even less of a reason to care. Mobile gaming is a huge industry and everyone your age probably does it or has done it at some point. Stop inventing stigmas in your mind and then being ashamed to do innocent things based on imaginary reactions from faceless strangers. You're not infringing on anyone's peace by tapping on your phone be it in a game or your picture gallery.

 No.59940

Used to play a bunch of chink gachas but got sick of them. East asian grinding + microtransaction + increasing hardware demand turned me away. The only one with good gameplay I played is Arknights, the rest are turn based auto battler trash. I also played Genshin on PC which has fun exploration but it'll probably look like shit on the phone. I heard succubi Frontline 2 will be an XCOM clone. Looks fun.

 No.59942

mobile games are trash you have to be a foid to even try them

 No.59944

Only good gacha and mobile game in general that I played was The Alchemist Code. Tactical RPG.

 No.59945

my phone's lcd and battery have a limited lifespan. i only use it for reading at low brightness at night primarily



File: 1680377353028.jpg (76.55 KB, 900x900, 1:1, channels4_profile.jpg) ImgOps iqdb

 No.59742[Reply]

Wizzies who play or played a lot of MOBAs I summon.

In my gaming career I always kind of dodged them but lately they've been a good way to sink some time in to just manage to get at the end of the day and go to sleep instead of pressing F5 on imageboards or rotting the brain away watching youtube videos.

Right now I play related picture and playing ranked. I pretty much lose every game but I dont really care. I was just wondering whatever it will be always like this or maybe if I keep playing I will just naturally get better since I don't care about reading online on how to improve.
6 posts omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.59841

File: 1682614825318.png (185.79 KB, 440x608, 55:76, chrome_8zcu3xMBL7.png) ImgOps iqdb

>>59742
I peaked Diamond 1 99lp a few weeks ago (though I dropped a bit and I'm currently D3). To answer your question: You will not improve much at all if you keep playing a lot of games without thinking. And you will not improve much at all if you never read up resources online on how the game works.

Trust me, I was stuck in Gold and Plat for the past 3 seasons, if you're not tryharding improvement, you will not get anywhere. It's impossible. If you're playing for fun, that's fine, but if you want to actually get good, you need to start reading up online and taking notes on how the game objectively works and what the best plays are. You need to understand the "theory" behind how a League game works. Then, you need to start VOD reviewing every one of your games, listing all of the differences between you and the theoretical perfect performance, and consciously trying to fix bad habits as you play. Playing a lot of games might improve your mechanics, but it won't fix anything else. It's a waste of time.

 No.59842

it's called assfaggots for a reason

 No.59843

>>59742
>>59841
By the way, just so you know, I would not recommend playing this game at all. My goal for this season was to get D4 by tryharding and then quit, but I got it within a month and a half of tryharding and I thought that Master tier would be doable… I regret it. This game is fucking horrible to play. I've wasted 800 games, about 400 hours of my life, in the past 4 months on this shit. And I am not having fun. Becoming better is slightly fulfilling and makes me happy, but that's about it. The game is not worth it, and if my mind wasn't forcibly preventing me from quitting until I reach my goal, I'd drop it immediately and go back to single player games. They're much more fulfilling and make me much more happy.

If you're new, quit as soon as you can.

 No.59891

File: 1683448433045.png (584.94 KB, 1600x900, 16:9, chrome_uwV6I0Zsjf.png) ImgOps iqdb

>>59841
>>59843
Update: Master tier. Now I can finally quit, and I can confidently say, fuck League of Legends. This game sucks.

 No.59910

>>59742
LOL gave me afib



  [Go to top]   [Catalog]
Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[ Home ] [ wiz / dep / hob / lounge / jp / meta / games / music ] [ all ] [  Rules ] [  FAQ ] [  Search /  History ] [  Textboard ] [  Wiki ]