/lounge/ - Lounge

>>325025
Yeah, it's pretty boring if the Bab-el-Mandeb isn't controlled by Egypt. Today you've got this pathetic case of a meaningless place called Yemen doing meaningless things there. Way cooler if Egypt's the one doing it.
Can't have it be Saba since that'd also be boring.. it has to be Egypt.

>>325025
Would be good to erase mosquitoes completely in the new world.

>>325078
Why erase them? They're annoying, they kill, and most importantly because they impede the expedition of certain projects, such as for instance reshaping and more properly enslaving Africa, a matter which cannot be tolerated in the new world.

>>325025
>>325015
In the same way you gather and concentrate the Jews of the world to Israel, placing them behind the mark of David and thus Akkadia *to make their handling a matter not laborious*, you likewise *gather the most robust, energetic, and capable of Muslims into the state of Khorasan, behind the prophesied black flag*, not merely to make monitoring and controlling them easier, but primarily also *to elevate the value of Israel via the pretext of a necessary contrapositive force, and thus make larger the net to gather Jews, self-proclaimed or otherwise, scattered everywhere*
Beautifully, as with Nazi Germany, Israel emerges more Jewish and more solid in its identity. So long as you can play the Hegelian sophistry, you're good to go, and this time, the antagonizers are good old 'loathsome 'Muslims'' in their most extreme incarnation–the state of Khorasan. Not Iran, but Khorasan, a fairly large country stretching from Azerbaijan to the unified Kashmir and Central Asia, comprising Iran within, naturally. The map's right there.
Once you have it in place plus Greater Ptolemaic Egypt ( muslim ) and Kharthage ( muslim ), you manufacture that much needed preamble in allowing Israel to expand for protective purpose. Yes, an expansion.. that leads to Akkadia.

>>325081
So the whole flag must of Khorasan must be that– pure black, with the Iranian symbol right there color coded as shown to contrast.

>>324999
I come to a serious doubt if the cat cry bacause he have a trauma around meat based in the monks or bacause there's a posibility of reincarnation… i know the history its the cat is vegetarian but i doubt this is a natural thing, something feels off when the cat cry… in any case this can be a serious anti-dharma thing to buddhists core ideas.

>>323001
I can imagine theres like 2% of the ants that know its a trap but if they do anything about it they'll get dogpiled by the majority white knight ants. Not even the insects are safe from normies

if this video's to be believed, 300 million dead in less than 20 minutes if the Chicxulub dino-killer asteroid struck Earth today

>>325026
or something equivalent to that, this one's a comet instead just because it's "more beautiful"

top water flavor by country, by state

>>325053
Delaware being the one pro-Crush state is weirdly funny

>>325003
You will NEVER survive with a disability! It's OVER for you!

>>325005
Don't make a thread asking how to survive a disability without even mentioning what disability would that be.

Man up and walk it off

>>325005
I'm the one who wrote this >>325004
I feel bad about that reply now; I was having a bad day and felt like lashing out at someone. The other reply sums up my original intention well, I thought the thread was low quality on account of the absence of any details about your condition. I could have just written that though, and I see that the thread now has more rubbish low-effort replies. Sorry.

I don't see how this is possible unless your country has some kind of disability payments.

This guy is great. He knows us Canadians aren't allowed to criticize our own government an anymore so he's doing it for us. Sending positive vibes.

>>324997
USA vs Cuba has already started like 6 months ago with the blockade so that obviously doesn't count.

China I think will probably make their move before the end of Trump's term simply because the Iranians proved he is literally the worst imaginable negotiator/commander in chief imaginable. The US will have significantly degraded stockpiles thanks to the Iran war.

Lebanon vs Hezbollah is the only other one on your list that I think might happen anytime soon.

>>325050
Likely war with turky, since israel has already made some hints at that.

>>325051
Israel is gearing up to finish the genocide they stared in Gaza. Houthis and Saudis are also gearing up for another round.

The gulf states have started firing back at Iran, but still in a limited capacity so I don't think they will get more involved but they could.

>>325056
>Israel is gearing up to finish the genocide they stared in Gaza
Boo. I hope the permawar stays permanent so that both inbred desert sides of the inbred desert war keep explosioning each other faster than they can inbreed new inbreds.

>>325039
>Persian
There's no such thing as 'Persian' or 'Persia' xD
I'll tell you this, too, that the group you ascribe this mythical name of 'Persia' were some of the most notorious offenders of paganistic ritual sacrifice, and still today arguably maintain that honor (if you believe 'Iranians' have anything to do with the myth of 'Persia') via the paganistic mother goddess doctrine of Shi'ism, which is just another 'ism' among many others ejaculated by a Jew from an awesome home in Jerusalem.
Today, the religion of Iran, a 'country' people like associating with the fabricated nonsense of 'Persia', seems proud in its carriage of a religion whose founder was assassinated by a little Jewess mistress via a cup of poison. That's how Muhammad died, you know. Or so they say, among tighter circles. A Jewish succubus poisoned him. And from there, the same Jewish succubus, her husband and clansmen, went on to conceive the Shia and Sunni policies, with the same attention to detail as their forefathers did when crafting and preparing Christianity and all its divisions xD

>>325038
>John locke
What a irony that you put a lot of random people or things in your "That's jewish so is evil and unhealthy i total sure bacause theres a jew somewhere" and at same time you ignore the founder and creator of racialist and ariosophist stupid ideas that still bring to today retardation around identity politics lol

>>325041
schizo denier strikes again

>>325049

>During the Battle of Khaybar, Hazrat Bishr(ra) also ate the poisoned meat alongside the Holy Prophet(sa), which was given to them as a gift by a Jewish female. When Hazrat Bishr(ra) swallowed a piece of the meat, he had not yet moved from his place when all of a sudden, his facial complexion changed and became like telasaan – a cloth which was predominately black in color. The pain was so severe, that for an entire year he was unable to turn over in bed without assistance and eventually, he passed away in this painful state. It is also stated [in other narrations] that the poison was so deadly that he had not yet moved from his place when after a short while of eating the meat, he passed away.
>The Prophet, in his ailment in which he died, used to say, "O `Aisha! I still feel the pain caused by the food I ate at Khaibar, and at this time, I feel as if my aorta is being sliced from that poison."
>Aisha reported: I saw the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, as he was dying and he had a cup of water, which he would dip his hand into and wipe his face with water, then he was saying, “O Allah, help me with the agonies of death!”

Hazrat Bishr and the Holy prophet. Two men who ate poisoned meat prepared by a Jew, two men who died as a result of trusting them.

God communicates to the Muslims and to all the rest of the world, that no matter what despicable acts Jews do, they are 'invincible'. Why? Because 'God chose them above all the world'.
He killed and laid waste to the Hamites, and he'll kill and lay waste to everything else. Why? Because he favors Jews.

The only conceivable way to change that adoration is by changing God's mind. But remember, the prayer of a Jew is superior to the prayer of a non-Jew in the eyes of God by virtue of the fact that he favors Jews more than he does everyone and everything else.

>>325038
>incoherent piecemeal response
I hope you find the help you need schizomancer.

>>324981
I am no scholar of greek but this puts me in mind of the following tidbit of Euclid that's stuck with me:

Δὸς αὐτῷ τρεῖς ὀβολούς, ἐπεὶ δεῖ αὐτὸν κερδαίνειν ἀπὸ τῶν μανθανομένων

which was translated to me as
"Give him three obols, since he must make a profit from us" that latter part however misconstructed being the striking part. Everything *must* generate a profit, it *must* contribute to the sum of human learning, because no other value is valid.

What I think the Greeks knew, and modern living is perhaps learning painfully once more, is the limits of rationality in the broad populace. Specifically in a context of abundance, where survival is taken as more of a given than a struggle (for the entrenched few), where every activity or decision has a reasonably stable outcome and basic rational behaviour when applied to it has a positive outcome… what then?

I work as an engineer, a good day or a good project for me raises the floor of labour required to make value in the modern world by some tiny degree such that 5-10 more people are no longer fit to contribute to it. Usually the staff i've been brought in to automate out of relevance. Perfectly rational course of action - where does *that* end?

The romantics and oligarchs of the post industrial revolution saw the rough outline of this reality and dove in to highly sentimental and flowery language as a badge of honour adding arbitrary complexity and unspoken expectations as almost a sport. Now I start to think it was actually the right thing to do - because I've read Kaczynski.

So consider; in a world with progressively more and more engineering and rational planning, where speciation is likely to be on the horizon based on wealth and luck, what's *left* for those below the standard of future true Aristocracy in the literal meaning but the fleeting joy and excitement of heroic poetry? Slavery in chains so light and gilded they know not the difference? Perfectly Rational Slavery of the mind if not the body? Azimov had a credible vision of this in the later Foundation books with Fallom and Solaria - an entire planet consisting of the estates of 100 or so biological individuals who detest being less than a thousand miles from each other.

Enshrining violence and valour in poetic form preserves it as something to be celebrated- becausPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>324987
>Enshrining violence and valour in poetic form preserves it as something to be celebrated

I think the glorifying of violence in books is fine so long as the narrative target is purposed at specific tyrannical elements limiting the freedom of other characters’ lives. But this isn’t the case with the Homeric poems, which celebrate indiscriminate violence and bloodshed in circumstances of pointless war. Agamemnon for instance is a basic fat greedy king who craves more power, whom Homer describes as Οἰνοβαρές, κυνὸς ὄμματ᾿ ἔχων, κραδίην δ᾿ ἐλάφοιο, wine-heavy, having the eyes of a dog, and the heart of a deer. And yet the whole of the Iliad features innocent brainwashed young soldiers dying on the behalf of the ambitions of this slob king. Though this was probably near the belligerent conditions of the ancient world, where half-deranged rulers led young men to their deaths. But our own modern day isn’t much different, where masonic puppets (presidents, prime ministers) of jewish bankers lead young men to their deaths.

>Because the cycle of violence is a cycle

Violence is the native quality of all biological life. A gnostic interpretation would be that the demiurge set us in a loop to devour each other. But I don’t necessarily support this view.

>What I think the Greeks knew, and modern living is perhaps learning painfully once more,

I think the Greeks understood this when we find the sentence: Βίος κέκληται δ' ὡς βίᾳ πορίζεται → Vi quia paratur vita, vita dicitur

It has been called life (bios) because it is supplied with force (bia). And then this is carried into Latin with similar alliteration as: Vi quia paratur vita, vita dicitur — Because life (vita) is prepared with force (vis), it is said life (vita).

I maintain that there is nothing wrong with this however so long as the carrying of force (violentia) is managed by a just ruling party (which at this moment in our world it is not).

> is the limits of rationality in the broad populace

If this is your way of saying the goyish herd is a stupid animal, then I agree with you.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>324994
>But this isn’t the case with the Homeric poems, which celebrate indiscriminate violence and bloodshed in circumstances of pointless war

Consider however that Valor and strength cannot be determined from a zero position and has to be both selected for and cultivated. Reckless expeditions of young men transmute the youthful energy into skill and tested capacity in ways that training - no matter how brutal - can never equal. The distortion of the modern era has perhaps forever disconnected this. Instead of genuine tests of character and bodily strenght, and environments that force virtue or death on the participants, baseline warfare has become so much of an accounting exercise that on the few instances when it stops behaving that way, the participants are largely incapable of responding.

Which is to say the madness of kings culling the weak is perhaps preferable to the madness of accountants and bankers achieving the same thing.

>Violence is the native quality of all biological life.

Feasibly one step further, violence - specifically physical distortion - is the nature of … well nature. The sun burns and destroys the bonds between atoms, the black hole rips stable equilibrium, the atomic decay of everything reduces the complex to the simple to be recycled with great waste and loss at every step. Therefore;

>pseudos gennaion
The problem with rejecting this, is that nobility of mind and character is - I think - a resource derived from either finite feedstock or second and third order effects of social constructs. It follows then that no matter how close to 100% efficient these processes or resources become, they will consume their baseline pre-requisites. Zero sum game as always. What then to be done with the un-improvable herd no matter how groomed and polished? Violence controlled by the virtuous ruling class?

>Euclid’s opinion
My reading of it was intentional sarcasm in response to the school boy level question of "But what will we do with knowing this? What profit is it?". Making the transaction explicit and immediate and holding it up as a lesson for those humble enough to read it. But perhaps that's my own bias against such sophistry.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>324981
Bro even in the middle ages scholars emphasized memory because books were so expensive. They had mnemonic "mind temples" they utilized in their imagination to better retain legal information.

Oftentimes the specifics of law was rote memorized because the actual legal charter was 100km away and you couldn't just pull a book out from your library. They were chained to desks.

Mnemonics only seriously declined in the 19th century, exactly when books proliferated exponentially, and coincidentally right when the university system first dumbed down. Thats when actual specialized degrees started instead of students being expected to learn on their own.

>>324981
>the Batrachomyomachia

This is a fun little read.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batrachomyomachia

>>323972
(((They))) won't be able to keep up this tyrannical pace forever

>>324746
I wouldn't really call our current society tyrannical. More like slowed down, soulless, stasis and lack of activity, more characterised by the complete abscence of something rather than what is present
no one really seems to actually care

>>324779

surely nothing tyrannical about jewish govts faking pandemics and forcing deadly depopulating drugs into the bodies of their slaves.

>no one really seems to actually care

because they are goyim?

>>324783
that event was dominated by people's collective reaction to introduce a not-working medicine for a non-existent pandemic
I guess you could say the government promoted this dysfunctional non-behavior which produces nothing valuable
tyrannical doesn't really describe it, more like soulless and inactive
the tyrants of ancient history at least send their people's to war or introduced strange rules in society like only wearing certain colors of clothing

>>324784
>tyrannical doesn't really describe it, more like soulless and inactive

Of course. Coercing innocent goyim over the course of 5 years into injecting themselves with unknown and unproved chemicals is only "soulless and inactive", not tyrannical.

>the tyrants of ancient history at least send their people's to war

Have absolutely nothing on the distributed jews that have now achieved world-government and who psychotically enforce the illusion of separate nation-states while playing the populations of these nations against one another in pointless conflict.

>>319709
>>319712
>>319770
>Don't you guys have headache and blurry vision after a while of staring at the PC?
you should get that checked out because that could be a sign of diabetes, macular degeneration, multiple sclerosis, corneal edema or glaucoma. i've been staring at a computer screen all day every day for the past 30+ years and have no issues. only time i have eye strain is if i turn off ambient light around screen (pitch black room) for too long or skip my sleep. as for headaches, i used to get chronic headaches (unrelated to screen time) but cured it with magnesium glycinate supplement

>>324880
> i've been staring at a computer screen all day every day for the past 30+ years and have no issues

CRT monitors cause eye strain you lying retard so if you were using them back then all day and everyday you definitely did experience some issues
It's been proven that crt can cause visual problems such as cvs
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_vision_syndrome

Any moment when I am not getting dopamine feels horrible. The silence is immediately filled with disquiet. First come the negative thoughts. If you're lucky, you can gather enough focus to meditate and minimize the anxiety, but the uneasiness will still be there throughout all the breathing and mindfulness, nothing except being on the internet erases it completely. Besides I can't meditate the whole day. If there is no negative thoughts or meditation then I just drift and it's dull. It's so dull I makes feel like I am not leaving. It's like being half asleep or being drugged up. I guess the only way is really to find a different source of dopamine. Nothing will really top the internet/porn/media combo though. That's the best high I can hope for in life. Probably the closest thing to happiness I can feel even if just for a short moment. It's just not sustainable. Isn't it kind of fucked the reason addiction is bad is because it feels so good it makes you scared to face how shitty real life is?

>>324963
real life becomes shitty if you consume too many things that generate dopamine dependence. you need to get back the capacity of being at peace with the simplicity of the life. See, it is about being calm and aligned with the simplicity of life, not looking for pleasure, it comes as a result of a life well lived

>>324965
No, the shittiness of life is inherent. Pleasure just snaps you out of being used to the shittiness. It's like if you grab an African cobalt mine slave and makes him live like a Saudi sheikh for a day, only to throw him back into the mine. The dopamine only makes real life sucks by comparison and makes addicts go into denial of having to live in the real world. If you are rich enough to not care about real life responsibilities, the optimum life to maximize happiness is to hook yourself to a quick and easy dopamine source and forget about the real world. Sure hedonic treadmills and boredom exist, but those can be managed. Still, the optimum happiness producing lifestyle for the rich is definitely to not face the real world. That's just for poor people.

>>324938
The Kalergi Plan is quite real, it's just that it's only focused on territories far away from Israel's immediate control, which is to say North and South America.

Israel can access Africa, Australia, Asia, Russia pretty easily. Everything there's more or less connected, but this isn't so with the foreign and far removed America, which should ever it turn against Israel, won't be easily incapacitated due to the oceanic barrier.

Therefore, to prevent that from ever happening, you make North America India, you make South America Africa.
You want 99% of everyone to be either Indian, black African, a Mexican or a latino. That's to say more mellow, savage and servile.

>>324940
In contrast, you want the more immediate states around you to be robust, powerful, strengthened, well reputed, productive, or aesthetically pleasing.
Immediate for Israel is Eran, Egypt, Babili, Khartage, Europa, Sapta Kashmir, China, Russia, Arabia, Saba, Aethiopia, Victoria, and the list goes on.
It's everything apart from North and South America. And probably, despite it all, India, just 'cos they're filth incarnate, reprobates, heathens, scum made animate, cursed by God to be mongrel ape monkey animals and damned from birth to death. Any proud son of Judah as with all other sons and daughters would advocate for their slaughter. But if reformation is possible, then reformation should be pursued. Once they retreat from the North East, Ladakh, Kashmir, and the Himalayas, is there any reason to antagonize them? Perhaps, but not strong reasons. Certainly not so strong that they override good faith.

>>324928
It'd be pretty bad if you made Russia a proper technological state, given its vector of force depends on exploiting primeval character. You don't need to extend spy and monitoring apparatus beyond stationing humans for the task. Giving people a spy-device and having cameras everywhere won't do. Rather, stationing spies, watchers and men here and there and everywhere is good.
This is a country fashioned so only one region is developed, that being the HQ and place wherein the president rests. Everywhere else, development should be no more than what the common Polish household had in 1994.
Should Russia become significantly more tech-advanced and should monitoring function through complex contraption as opposed to the most simple of means, the primeval element distributed across the nation will vanish, making rebellion and insurgency more likely. This is in contrast to regions elsewhere in the world where urbanization and deploying of devices and cameras lessens rebellion. In Russia, the more widespread opulence becomes, the faster disaster brews. Letting things operate as nature intended with the farmers farming and the business men tending to kiosks and the mechanics doing what they do more than suffices to keeping a lid on things. But if the Russian is thoroughly modernized and given access to all amenities the rest of the world enjoys, the first thing he'll do is stage a a coup d'etatat, and then another, and then another.
The country should be no more modern than Mongolia, which soon it will annex, with some toleration accepted by the spoilt Kazakhstan, which soon it will annex.

Gog and Magog should be just that–savages. Not creatures who carry around future-tier tech. Some fairly modern amenities are acceptable sure, but no further than in Moscow and its outermost zones.

Otherwise, Russia will spiral to collapse. Only diminishment and grey miasma keeps that from happening. Stepping beyond ersatz good and into true good makes the country fall apart.
All that said, Russian borders should be tightened against the Chinese, and maybe it's best to conceive a more robust new intelligence agency. Though saying this, the paradox of a not really monitored but really monitored state via conventional means somehow has to be maintained. It should be possible to run into the forests and escape in the mountains… in iPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>324944
The Mongols were in the illuminati card game I'm sure, and if you hypothesize what the best strategic option with that card is, you end up with Russia annexing Mongolia.. and its brother Kazakhstan.
There's no way the RU can stand against the might of a totally integrated EU otherwise. What option is there but to play the 'Mongol Card'? >>324928

It's been a long time since I've seen a thread hit the bump limit and then start bumping again after the post count went 200% above that limit. I think it was the 2016 US election version of this thread. This one took a good minute to archive off-site and it may have to be excluded from the local archive because our back end has a hard time converting threads this large. I've made a new thread and locked this one.

I'd like to request the guy making the geopolitical predictions with the colored maps to just make your own thread about your interest. It obliterated all other discussion in this historically open, long-lasted thread.