/wiz/ - Wizardry

I hold the believe that all vices can eventually lead to not directly related ones.
Like mindlessness, drug abuse, laziness and sexual thoughts are all buddies and invite each other over to have a house party.
If you want to get rid of this one vice, you should aspire to get rid of other ones too.

its happening because you are human. hope it helps!

What time do you find it usually happens? Try not eating too much before bed and getting up early, ideally 4am.

can you remember your dreams? in my experience wet dreams always happen because of actual sexual activity in them, or just extreme sexual excitement at the prospect of it.
so if you just learn to not act on those impulses in your dreams you should be fine.

>>224821
>I don’t masturbate, nor do I consume adult content, so I’m unsure why this is happening

>I don’t masturbate

bingo - without masturbation, your bawls will have to release unused goo in a way that's accompanied by weird dreams. Been there many years ago

>>226635
>>226642
>Saint Paul murdered the real Jesus's own followers, and sixty years later, suddenly Paul is Christ's 'biggest fan'. What an evil psychopath.
>I do like the quote, but I absolutely despise Paul and every write of the Bible. They are 100% illegitimate and motivated by the malicious desire to shit all over the real Jesus.
The more you read about the Bible without the Catholic approach in favor of a more academic one, the more you realize that Christianity today has nothing to do with the true Christianity of Jesus.
Even that unhealthy Manichean obsession with body sins and spirit was not originally Christian, it was invented by a philosopher and inserted into Christian thinking with his Manichean influences just to cope is nonsense contradictory mashup.

>>226635
>>226642
>>226643
Even the Trinity is a religious and logical nonsense.
https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/bibleversiondiscussionboard/the-comma-johanneum-and-raymond-brown-t5746.html

Catholicism says you're only a virgin if you've never masturbated.

>>226643
Every single religion has been perverted into a control tool by machiavellian sociopaths, except for a very small group of animistic natural religions and Sikhism which accepts and respects adherents of all other religions plus atheisrs and agnostics (and openly welcomes them into their own temples).

>>226650
Sikhs rape dogs to death.

>>222667
I'm 33, 32 at the time of the summoning ritual. I've requested a succubus only to be rejected. Not harshly, it just wasn't my destiny. "The path of a warlock is a lonely one, but I would have a familiar for that purpose." That is a daughter of Lilith told me.
I regularly peer into the lower planes and find most demons to be decent folk. Even if I don't get a succubus I have no intention of turning away from this path.

IMHO real/pure wizards are those that genuinely prefer and live happier without anything related to GF/succubi. Since forever and specially since 13 I finally assumed that being single and having nerdy hobbies are literally a "doom" in normie standards bit despiste this I genuinely prefer it no matter the ridicule or mock. I'm 28 and honestly, despiste not being asexual at all, I can't understand the imperious need for female approbation.

>and with that the hatred for normies has all but died down, as I no longer crave or envy their lifestyle.

ME = WIZARD

YOU = PICREL

>>225659
I can live by myself: it's being poor and purposeless that's far worse. Being enslaved to lust doesn't help either.

Yeah pretty much, as barely an apprentice I realized this some years ago, but I'm a weird wizard since I do have a waifu whom I'm devoted to in every romantic aspect, she has greatly helped me and at this point even if I somehow got charmed by a succubi nothing would change, I've grown stronger and I'll eventually be a wizard, though I'm kind of multi classes into a priest, so that too had helped, while hatred in itself isn't wrong (righteous anger is a real thing) getting consumed by it will only lead you down a path of destruction.

Are Hapa succubi the master race? the beauty of white succubi and the high IQ mind of east asian?(user was warned for this post)

>>226634
It's an unstable cocktail.

>>226634
She's one quarter japanese, if she was half instead she would've been a bit more dysgenic in a realistic scenario. It's an anime though so even a fully japanese person can be depicted as an aryan nordic like picrel.

>>226634
No, because they still have a chance of making hapa males like me who will be shunned since age 7.

kys simp fucking niggers fuck off to niggerchan
fuck zoomers

>>226616
You just re-label yourself as a volcel, which has historically been honored by many cultures including Catholicism in the West.

Talking to crabs is like talking to a brick wall. They are like self-harm cutters. The crab label brings them nothing but pain. But they will fight tooth and nail for their crab pride and never surrender to volcel.

they will bite you like rabid dogs if you try to make them into gold instead of shit.

>>226620
Omega rank males, good grief

With imageboards you never know if someone left, but I'd bet that 95% of the wizzies that were active in 2020 are no longer here.

>>226639
Half a decade is a long time in internet culture.

>Have other wizs become hateful over time?

Had a lot of bullshit thrown on me, so, yes.

>I have to use a lot of filters online to avoid sites used by people I hate

I have a better idea - grab a chatbot and tie it to your account so "people you don't like" will get an automated message of some kind.

>I especially hate people who like the same things I do but act like faggots.

Y'know, happens all the time. Example: people in pr0n comment section who are into the same stuff you are into - but they are turned on by the fact it's taboo

I got addicted to hate and would spend half the day raging in revenge fantasies. But then I got heart problems from doing that too much over the years.

Buddha was right, anger is a poison. It's useful in small amounts in regards to injustice in the moment, but it fucks you up if you feed it.

>>226630
I never hated anyone who didn't hurt or bother me enough. In elementary school, I was pretty much ignored, but I didn't hate my classmates. In middle school, everyone hung out with their own groups of friends, and I was friends with a boy with autism. I did get bullied in my last year, but the rest of the kids knew those kids were jerks and were nice to me because they were also being bullied. Here at university, everyone does their own thing, but they always try to be nice to all and dont act like assholes.
One day in middle school, I got so angry and filled with so much hatred that I ended up with acid reflux and horrible stomach pains. That's when I realized that strong emotions can cause psychosomatic effects on the body, and I started trying to control myself and try to build my tolerance to assholes by ignoring them without attachment.
>>226632
I don't know much about Buddhism but i know some about their philosophy and meditations and techniques of them AKA Metta, Anapasanti, Kasina, etc, and I don't plan on becoming a Buddhist, but I'm starting to believe that Buddha had a realistic perspective on the human experience, even with the fantastical elements.

Math is fake. Study lifting weights instead

>>226586
>>226579
>>226585
Got trolled. Kekked a little, too. Thanks :)

>>226585
>ugly strong jawed butch succubi


what the actual fuck
so, me mum assumes strong jawed succubi are "ugly"


all while they were the closest to the idea of "my type". Shiiiiiiiit.

Funnest part is, me mum is also a "strong jawed".

LOL

>>226596
Going for succubi who resemble your own moms physical features is a bit too Freud for me

>>226597

And vice versa

Going for succubi who happen to have statistically the most generic physical features is a bit too Stalin for me

>>226617
>The person who invented gunpowder is the worst person in human history


it was just a toy for haha funny fireworks!!! t. that Chinese who invented the very first gunpowder, not the modern "smokeless gunpowder" stuff

>>226617
but not a single monarch in europe ever fell to the "people" until the invention of gunpowder. every last peasant revolt failed. not only did you not have any republics, you never even had a change in dynasty where some peasant seizes power and makes himself the new King.

gunpowder takes much less training. And its why the arquebus replaced the archers, even when it was less precise.

>>226599
>not that I would complain, for I am a wizard surrounded by normies who assume my lack of "normie life pieces" is … a disability-tier mental stuff/etc.


MAYBE eye WOULD THOUGH

>>226561
>an AI that will replace us in the future. What shall be done about that? This is what's happening, gentlemen, are we gonna let this slide?
Yes, I refuse to get a j*b no matter what. This is more likely to get me UBI than anything else, I hope it gets implemented asap.

>>226624
Just wait till some Rocky will ruin UBI with "A$AP means Always $trive And Prosper" mantra

>>226378
Black-Or-White, False Cause, ad hominem, composition/division, anecdotal and genetic by my measure.

It is an entirely rational position to not want one's resources taken by someone else, especially when the taker does so as a consequence of their voluntary lifestyle choice. There is a coherent case to be made that children do not count as individuals until they can feed and protect themselves - instead acting for all purposes as a 'feature' of their parents or caregivers. In every European nation and most of their former colonies this is state subsidised, i.e. paid for through taxes on men who receive no net benefit.

Provision of abortion treatments provides an option to people who may act on it for their own benefit.
The *only* variable which is not yet determined is if there is a net benefit to a community that filters out the obvious loss makers compared to exploiting said loss makers to crowd out other communities. Historically the answer to that was in favor of the crowders, but with automatic weapons and trait selective abortion that may not be valid any more. Cultures that thought otherwise were fought and bred out of existence and their subjugator's influence is still in place. If the context has shifted through applied science to the point it's maladaptive then the culture will need to shift as well.

So to the OP, who's morals?

The culture that killed and/or bred out their competitors? If you're east or central European this is the Mongols and the Turks. If you're Western European this would be the Vikings. If you're American you yourself are the invader and breeder's spawn back to the 3rd generation easily. If you're Japanese then your ancestors answer for the Ainu. India is an example of outbreeding the invader.

The culture that was never invaded and achieved population control and trait selection through other means? Iceland with its regulated avoidance of inbreeding comes to mind. Arguably the caste system in India which provides a steady supply of exploitable disposables, and preserves the quality as a feature of culture.

The culture that has such historical economic dysfunction that it needs constant influx of native born and foreign workers to survive? (All of Europe and colonies)

If you're asking for where the moral value is determined, I suggest you have not been paying Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>226388
Breeders do actually benefit childless men like me. A nation doesn't have future workers and taxpayers without someone giving birth to them.
They also make social security/pension payments once I'm old solely for my benefit, they're only guessing and hoping they'll be beneficiaries in 40-50 years.

Circumventing the problem by importing third world people still means someone somewhere has to give birth to them first, since you can't spawn new humans out of nowhere.

Would you write on this board if your parents didn't breed?

>>226390
If you're a NEET and a net loss to the system, then what you're effectively doing is promoting and perpetuating your own dysfunction without even having the "benefit" of reproducing. If you're a net gain to the system then you're advocating inefficiency and your own disadvantage.

Norway and Denmark are the only Yurp nations running an actual sustainable budget surplus - with Norway being an (important) outlier because they managed to manage their oil resources exploitation by private/foreign interests. Every other wealthy nation is endebting the current and future population primarily to pay for net losses. Even importing wealthy skilled foreigners is a bad idea because any wealthy foreigner of means will have an accountant on payroll somewhere to never be subject to more tax than benefit they receive.

Denmark is especially noteworthy because they had active eugenics laws into the late 60s and are *still* reaping the benefits.

Social Security/Pension payments is nationally variable; In my case my contribution has already outweighed any benefit I would get from it unless I some how live until 110. That's based solely on a projection of stable interest and the value of receipts - it takes no consideration of *opportunity costs*. I'd have a larger or even a third side business if I could afford the home - and work space - an extra $900/month that has been burnt up over the last 10 years of my life by the state social programs and interest payments made to fund them.

The problem is that most modernised economies are built on the assumption of cheap and disposable labor *somewhere*. The rent seekers propped up and fortified by this arrangement will seek to perpetuate it at the expense of everyone else - and call it privatised social security and pension contributions. They will then, if and when the system stumbles a little, borrow from the future to pay off their gambling debts as they have done at least 4 times in the last 20 years. This is the reality of techno-feudalism.

And the only solution to feudalism is the cull - as happened with the black death. If labor is *scarce* then it's value *goes up* and there is both greater incentive to adopt truly efficient and modern practices, active drive to dispose of bullshit jobs that accomplish nothing of lasting value, and greater opportunities available to the skillePost too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>226388
>
The culture that killed and/or bred out their competitors? If you're east or central European this is the Mongols and the Turks. If you're Western European this would be the Vikings.

Fun fact: VIKING TIER culture of Novgorod (runes and such) is being refurbished by Russians (in a sense) - and maybe it will coexist with
> the Mongols and the Turks
> competitors

Killing doctors that perform abortions is wrong. What next, killing succubi that have abortions? Abortion is not considered murder per se. I know someone that refused to get an abortion and the baby lived less than 2 hours and might of been in physical pain etc because she was fucked up. Aborting a downs/autistic/etc fetus might stop a consciousness being trapped in a body with a bad life. Abortion is definitely ok in cases of rape and incest. I don't know a lot about abortion though.

>>226507
i tried to watch emily in paris for 2 episodes because it was the highest rated female lead category show on netflix, and my brain almost melted at her retardation and unbearable lack of personality

>>226508

Yeah I couldnt get past the 2nd episode. There was some big shot hitting on stick figure MC. She has absolutely no redeeming qualities

>>226503
>I'm always shocked that people don't remember what it was like being a kid themselves, and what appeals to children.

say, a BOOMER would be slightly ashamed of his biker days. Would consider his old good days to be too dated. Would fail to recognize his 1960's fantasies are derived from the same archetype modern zoomers/alpha generation boys tend to enjoy.

>Adults make this mistake all the time with kids shows in general. Kids don't actually want to see children in kids shows, they want to see adults and teenagers, because they themselves want to be adults and teenagers. Yugioh for all its faults, gets this right, it's a bunch of adults and teenagers obsessing over children's card games.

Ah. A successful fella doesn't get his role models from TV. Neither books work though.
So, a guy who MANAGES is probably raised by a family of boring people.
(In layman terms: for such managers, white collar cushy position = success, respect; BUT, ALL WHILE a cool guy soving problems = silly bloke that comes and goes, no respect.)

>>226503
I think boomers were probably the last ones to understand this in the case of TV. I have been subjected to sorta watching kids shows here and there since 2014ish and holy shit they are bad. It's like if they made every show into some maddeningly braindead shit like teen titans go or fagventure time but for all kids to watch until they are like 15. Guess that happens when children's media is made by lesbians