/meta/ - Meta

>>65680
Might need a little touching up since the text is a bit hard to read.

Give me the chance and I'll destroy the bot. Just the bot and its posts. Nothing else.

…

>>65721
>>65732
A staff member with the power to properly delete the spam would also have the ability to effectively delete all files on the website permanently on a database level. No recovery. Wizchan doesn't use janitor roles so all staff have this power. It's why I haven't really tabled opening applications. One of you assholes could play me for a fool and destroy the website. Then I'd probably close it down and have to find another page to refresh for 14 hours each day. If you're serious about volunteering, hit up the email at the bottom of the FAQ.

>>65724
>Every other website has managed to figure out how to block this shit except you.
That's not true at all. When it was online, the Xj9k bot proved that Wizchan was among the least effected by CP spam. Our own mod log shows a lot of rejected posts at the same time that other imageboards are being attacked. The current spammer is just using a VPN offering many IPs that haven't yet been flagged as such, so our system regards her posts as coming from a genuine user. When we get hit I often do my rounds on other imageboards, many in different languages and running entirely different software, and there's always a lot who are also being hit with spam at the same time as us.

>You can't claim it's technically impossible because you don't know how to do it.
It is impossible to operate a website that allows for user-submitted content that can't also be spammed with CP. Even if new posts are put in to a queue to be approved, the image file is still uploaded to the server where it can be picked up by our host's routine content scanner… But even then, the scanner would fail to pick up the file as a registered illegal image because this spammer has been generating new hashes for all of the images. So the pictures get through even if we've already banned them, but they're less volatile nonetheless. Any other preventive measures would probably violate the core nature of an imageboard. Any suggestions as to what we may be able to do? In my opinion the only hope for a functional preventative solution would be to employ an AI model that can evaluate imaPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>65734
>have the ability to effectively delete all files on the website permanently on a database level
lol you're telling me stuff I didn't even know one could do as a staff member
>If you're serious about volunteering, hit up the email at the bottom of the FAQ
nah im not that serious about it so I won't.
It's just that whenever the spam is posted I happen to see it
and there's this impulse to delete ugly stuff…

>>65721
is this your first time on wizchan?

I really don't know why would someone want to have a history with all the posts that you have made here. I don't see the utility of it. With the watchlist is enough to follow the threads where you have posted.

>>64571
yeah i just realized this too and kinda hate that. I doubt anyone would ever go here on my IP, but it's strange that it's linked this way in the first place…

However i do kinda like the history feature to re-read some of my past thoughts… but now i don't really like that it's sort of public

>>64369
>My IP address changes from time to time though, does that mean that I will lose the post history once it changes?
yeah can confirm, i think i got an IP change and now the history page is empty…

Now regretting NOT blocking the page…
Whoever gets my old IP, hope they are chill

>>64364
The website's back end has a dwarf who lives inside a computer and he has a scrap book that he makes for every user and each time a new post is made he prints out a copy and puts it into your book with a glue stick c:

>>65730
Great Book of Grudges

>3. allow virgin lgbt people
if you are stating your sexual preference you have no business here. If you think stating your gender is important again, you have no business here.

>>65658
https://archive.is/h4tDD
Shinglenigger has been a problem for atleast 5 years.

Let's make everyone asexual. This way everyone here can be lgbt+.

Ban /meta/

>>65716
/meta/ has been irrelevant since it was delisted from /all/

[ 2d14 = 9 ]

I like to play GURPS [ 3d6 = 7 ]

test

Man your instructions for using this are shit explain it better

Wonder if anyone been busy archiving the wiki for personal data hoarding…

Is there any altchan who has program systematically scraping threads and rearranging them in a foolfuka-style websites? Not even Japanese imageboards have them, I believe. 4chan is quite a unique case in this regard. People might talk shit about the website but its userbase is still passionate enough to go through the cost of archive billions of posts.

>>65708
I can name a few

>>65708
There aren't that many imageboards with actual dedicated offsite archives.

there's nothing worth saving. let wizchans history die

AI content is allowed, however, your thread didn't contribute with anything in particular like an AI song for example. Next time try to contribute with something meangful.

ok you meang i will try

>decentalized blockchain cloudcringe nodeslop
>realtime posting
>SUHKYURITY
Just use Discord Goddamn

That's good. I'm not entirely savvy to the meaning behind "federated" but there seems to be a fair amount of countermeasures to raids incorporated in to Syndichan. Wizchan exists as kind of an antique relic from the "Anyone can now make their own imageboard" days. I've been adverse to upgrades that could deteriorate this now nostalgic identity. Users who have been posting here for years are comfortably tuned to our software's crap factor and that's something special. If Wizchan could be moved to Syndichan to benefit from the backend enhancements without it diminishing the retro user experience, I'll consider upgrading.

>>65678
Liveboards are the future chud

>>65679
im ur secret wiz admirer. what do u think of that, wizmin.

>>65678
Where does it say that this is using blockchain technology?

>>65673 That’s what I plan to do; I’ll make it open source, but for now, it’s working well for me—take a look.

>>65674
better not be vibe coded. why did u post this on meta, anyway?

>>65675 I forgot to mention that my goal is to create a complex operating system because I enjoy manual programming. As for "vibe coding"? I mostly use AI to help me fix compilation errors. Right now, I'm starting over from the kernel to resolve some startup issues. :D

>>65676
well you seem incredibly talented. i wish you good luck with it, wizzie.

>>65686
thanks man

Why can't I get a response on this?

>>65682
Thanks. That response makes no sense though. Some inaccuracy is better than no numbers at all. Oh well