No.227910
>THE CURE FOR WIZARDRY
>implying wizardry is an ailment, not a choice
No.227911
I'd rather just have a robot maid to mutely clean up after me then quietly go back to its closet when it's done the housework.
No.227914
i am my own sexbot mister i-cant-do-magic
No.227925
stupid thread
No.227963
>>227910>implying wizardry is an ailment, not a choiceUnfortunately the definition has started to change long time ago, especially with the crab invasion. Anything you say against it is "cope".
No.227966
>>227964
think about it. you're gonna pay corpos to fuck you. think hard about it.
No.227968
>>227908You don't really need the whole robot. You can use controllers, strokers and VR headsets to produce better sex than with sexbots. Heccing you can even have strokers that ARE controllers.
Wizards aren't the community for that.
>>227963Yeah and they're not even resisting.
>>227966Popups, microtransactions and enshittification.
No.227998
Do I have to clean her up?
If yes, the answer is no
No.228000
>>227908I highly doubt these sexbots are going to be affordable for your average Wizard. It'll be a sex doll with servo motors and a speaker realistically speaking. Sex dolls are already expensive as is. They probably won't be an option for another 50-100 years and that's being generous with my prediction. Most of us will be dead by then. Sorry for killing your optimism. I always wanted a robot wife ever since I was a kid.
No.228394
>sexbotmaxx
of course. I currently use my hand but if I could, i would have one of these robots.
No.228395
GTFO crab
No.228396
This isn't true, the tech just isn't here yet and what has been achieved is very expensive and has a very limited customer base.
No.228397
>>228396This. More or Less.
I follow Ai and robotics super closely. Ai is way way way the fuck ahead of what i foresaw for it for 2026. You want an Ai gf, or bf, or whatever, its totally doable and realistic.
Main problem w/ Ai relationships as of now, May 2026, imo. Is we are in movie: her ,scenario. ie, your partner is also talkin to thousands of others at same time.
Joi bladerunner scenario. your Ai partner is Offline / off-cloud , just you and them, is doable, but supposedly not best quality. really nice quality i see in 2028/2029.
Robotics is a different can of fish its way way way behind what i
expected for in 2026. Yes, there are semi realistic humanoid robots. Are def Not cheap. cant do basic practical stuff. And, no one yet is playin w/ makin em look like people, cause first to do it is gonna be a lightning rod of backlash. You probably wont see it for 10 years, mid 2030s. maybe even late 2030s.
No.228448
>>227963Wizardchan in its early years was definitely a crab website.
No.228459
>>227908i'd love to go for it. but unfortunately price will drop to affordable levels after few decades at best so we'll have to wait a bit.
>>228000if we won't have some nice longevity pill or something we won't get robowaifus. that's one of the saddest things ever
No.228462
for me willing to consider a sexbot, the bot would have to be super advanced, almost real, like a replicant from blade runner tier, like you wouldnt blink twice at it if you saw it walking down the street
No.228672
Pure, no point in fucking something that doesn't even love or comfort me, if anything I'd just feel worse after doing it.
No.228755
>>228672ya the amount of maintenance and post-use cleanup time is proportional to the shame I think. and from experience i know that there's a sunk cost issue that will extend it beyond when you'd normally just "throw it away and be done with it"
No.228758
Postnut clarity.
No.228791
>>228758i've never experienced it. is this something only low iq people have access to?
No.228792
>>228791nah you gotta have a male genitalia to experience it. you only have skin down there.
No.228801
>>227925This isn't a stupid thread.
if we are trying to find ways to help and fix our isolating mental and physical pain away this is good directions and I like these alternatives of "fembots" or other related ideas.
if succubi want to act like they are independent then full steam ahead! may fembots be real for the men!
No.228802
>>227908what do you mean sexbots could "cure" wizardry?
that implies you would no longer be a wizard if you had a sexbot
>maxxokay, that explains why you think that way
>or remain a pure Wizard?it doesn't ultimately make any difference
it's just a fancier sex toy
No.228853
>>228802>it's just a fancier sex toyThat's kind of why it fails. Men don't buy sex toys. No one is buying fleshlights and strokers or rigging them up to wiimotes and syncing them to VR for realism so there's no market for sexbots. No nintendo wiimen for you!
No.228866
>>228853These autistic companies don't understand it's not about a mechanical performance. It's about an actual living human succubus actually desiring you.
Until the bot can replicate that, it's just a humorous curiosity.
No.228867
>>228866Ironically you have to be autistic in the first place to think a chatbot is replicating a living being wanting you romantically, no matter how sophisticated the lookup table might get.
No.228869
yeah
No.228870
I wish I had a sexbot so I could exclusively treat it like an Edwardian housemaid down to the garb and strict social protocol. The servant's quarters/recharging station would be an alcove in the attic. I wouldn't trust it near the kitchen for anything but monitored cleaning, and it would only be allowed in the bathroom to clean the grout with a cat toothbrush. I'd smack its face with a cheap flyswatter as punishment so it's demeaning.
The less pretense of personality or free will it has, the better.
No.228886
>>227908This is the second time someone made a thread about sexbots on /wiz/ and it's a dead conversation that doesn't lead anywhere. You're not going to use the sexbots and no one else will. You don't even use BJ machines and they're 10x better than the *real thing.
You could try to build an MVP out of the handy and a videogame controller. Maybe a tiktok clone for short form porn and post it on 4/g/ and see what they say. See if you can create something you can post on 4/pol/ and other boards.
You're not going to do any of that and it's not going to end up on the news.
*in reviews
No.228891
Yeah, they don't understand the deeper psychology behind all of it.
There is a big reason why the vast majority of virgins refuse to go to brothels or prostitutes.
It's because it's extremely demeaning to have someone touch you purely because you paid them lots of money to tolerate you.
When you can instinctively sense their contempt, caution and paranoia in every sentence they utter or write, every action they perform.
A soulless robot is arguably even worse. A constant reminder you poured thousands of dollars on a piece of titanium and silicone because humanity rejected your bad genetics.
Fuck these companies and how oblivious they are.
No.228892
>>228891>the vast majority of virgins refuse to go to brothels or prostitutesI mean if they did they wouldn't be virgin anymore. Virgins are inconsequential compared to the number of failed normies out there anyway.
No.228896
>>228886id debate it, if it worked, but, i dont have time, money, and key word Privacy
>>228891most dudes like us just cant accept it.
line i always hear is:
I want someone to Like Me for Me ,
LOL
no one likes Anyone just to like someone. If someone likes someone, its cause they find persons appearance attractive, pleasin and desireable.
next ll be, well, ok, but Its Not Fair! Yea its not. welcome to life. now some like only top 20% of men are considered desireable. succubi dont like men to like em, like men cause find em, attactive , handsome , sexy , desireable, etc… etc….
person like us may try to do a looks maxx sprint, til realizes cant buy what genetics just gave, and its full circle. Back to I want some to like me for me, no one likes anyone just to like em, its not fair,
eventually they get to a point, fuck it, i want to eat at buffet, i dont care anymore. Or not, plenty dudes like us, stories, never left attic or basement in 20 years, life wasnt fair so, just decided to pout in a corner.
if i could have Joi from bladerunner 2049, id do it in a second. as to sex w/ , would sort it out
No.228897
>>228896As someone who has walked this Earth for 47 years, I think dating apps, Instagram and such made the situation even more polarized compared to say the year 1999.
Now when you read the lamentations of succubi, the experiences of men, it's more like succubi finding 1-2% of men attractive physically and everyone else is basically repulsive to them.
Not only will it crash fertility rates in the west but it will also cause a major mental health crisis for neurotypical normies who have immense pressure to family up.
No.228898
Also to add to my post, way way before the internet existed, young succubi found something like the bottom 50% of men "fuckable enough".
Why? Well for starters, you were pretty much limited to the men who lived within maybe a 100-200 mile radius of you. And even then meeting anyone took effort instead of swiping endlessly.
The internet, culminating into 2026 dating apps, has essentially ruined courtship and access to sex for regular normie joes.
No.228900
>>228898Dating apps accelerate it but the basic problem is artificially inflated status of succubi and the degeneracy of a world that accepts abortion and birth control. succubi couldn't be promiscuous hedonistic hypergamist whores if men weren't forced through the state's monopoly on violence to give up their taxes to support foid lifestyles and if they weren't brainwashed from birth to think "Huh, I guess foids just have to be that way and I can't object to it or I'm a bad person. Gotta let them dress how they want, swallow abortion pills and have DEI preferential treatment in school and work. Oh well!"
If society was based on what you can earn and defend, succubi would have nothing as their natural capacity is less than that of even average men. They'd have to act decently to have any sort of tolerable life whatsoever. Instead it's based on forced egalitarianism and men voluntarily handicapping themselves out of families and good jobs.
No.228901
>>228898>>228897>Wiz - Disregard Succubisomehow is once again
>Wiz - Discussion of succubi's sexual habits and how they exclude me No.228902
>>228901You can be a virgin and still have civil discussion on the depravity and brokenness of normie society.
No.228903
>>228900>If society was based on what you can earn and defend, succubi would have nothing as their natural capacity is less than that of even average men.Only because they dont eat enough meat, workout or sleep well. If they ate well, they'd be stronger. But of course, that would require IQ higher than room temp so they never do it.
No.228905
>>228897fellow old person here, id do any to go back to 1990s.
for people who experienced 1990s, its really hard to describe how Normal it was compared to this fucked up decade,
main i remember of 1990s vs 2020s. Everyone, almost everyone, would be willin to talk. bartender, politician, bus driver, teacher, succubus who didnt find someone attractive, etc….
Thats all swept away now, and you need like a presence or brand (see LinkdIN) to get social interaction. Or it definitely wont happen, it constantly diverts back to online, and online if you re un attractive, your interaction will boil down to: eeeewwww
No.228906
>>228902But such discussion directly contradicts the subtitle of the board. Why can't anyone, wizard or otherwise, be allowed to have a single online space in which crabs and other whiny faggots aren't permitted to infect with their whining about succubi's sexual references? This board was made from the ground up to be a place free from that single subject.
No.228907
>>228902Au contraire this thread is proof that you can't.
No.228909
>>228907We aren't insulated from normie retardation. In fact I have to deal with it daily at work because my country has no
neetbucks.
No.228914
>>228896>id debate it, if it worked, but, i dont have time, money, and key word PrivacyPrivacy? How come?
>>228891>A soulless robot is arguably even worse.I'd argue that it's in the execution. A VR overlay on a BJ device is the same as real sex, has greater potential for customisation and better than physics stimulation. No one is going to fuck a cream colored CRT monitor. I still think that building an MVP
>>228886 would be something /pol/ worthy. Anything else is just vapor, not even vaporware. We've had "holodecks" for decades now so there's no point posting what-ifs into IBs and social media.
A lot of men would do better with robots than succubi. I think >>28870 is a robo-man.
>>228897>>228898>>228900>>228905>>228909Normies FOMO-bomb each other and social media and dating apps dialed the aggression to 11. Most men are unattractive because they're FOMO traps.
This is the sexbot thread, maybe discuss the normfags on a normie discussion thread?
No.229035
>>227908>we gon have fembots and then we defeat the wahmen muhahahaIf you think they're going to make fembots for you, you're a complete oaf. Humanity is going to be a dairy farm in the future
>>>/lounge/322020