No.227910
>THE CURE FOR WIZARDRY
>implying wizardry is an ailment, not a choice
No.227911
I'd rather just have a robot maid to mutely clean up after me then quietly go back to its closet when it's done the housework.
No.227914
i am my own sexbot mister i-cant-do-magic
No.227925
stupid thread
No.227963
>>227910>implying wizardry is an ailment, not a choiceUnfortunately the definition has started to change long time ago, especially with the crab invasion. Anything you say against it is "cope".
No.227966
>>227964
think about it. you're gonna pay corpos to fuck you. think hard about it.
No.227968
>>227908You don't really need the whole robot. You can use controllers, strokers and VR headsets to produce better sex than with sexbots. Heccing you can even have strokers that ARE controllers.
Wizards aren't the community for that.
>>227963Yeah and they're not even resisting.
>>227966Popups, microtransactions and enshittification.
No.227998
Do I have to clean her up?
If yes, the answer is no
No.228000
>>227908I highly doubt these sexbots are going to be affordable for your average Wizard. It'll be a sex doll with servo motors and a speaker realistically speaking. Sex dolls are already expensive as is. They probably won't be an option for another 50-100 years and that's being generous with my prediction. Most of us will be dead by then. Sorry for killing your optimism. I always wanted a robot wife ever since I was a kid.
No.228394
>sexbotmaxx
of course. I currently use my hand but if I could, i would have one of these robots.
No.228395
GTFO crab
No.228396
This isn't true, the tech just isn't here yet and what has been achieved is very expensive and has a very limited customer base.
No.228397
>>228396This. More or Less.
I follow Ai and robotics super closely. Ai is way way way the fuck ahead of what i foresaw for it for 2026. You want an Ai gf, or bf, or whatever, its totally doable and realistic.
Main problem w/ Ai relationships as of now, May 2026, imo. Is we are in movie: her ,scenario. ie, your partner is also talkin to thousands of others at same time.
Joi bladerunner scenario. your Ai partner is Offline / off-cloud , just you and them, is doable, but supposedly not best quality. really nice quality i see in 2028/2029.
Robotics is a different can of fish its way way way behind what i
expected for in 2026. Yes, there are semi realistic humanoid robots. Are def Not cheap. cant do basic practical stuff. And, no one yet is playin w/ makin em look like people, cause first to do it is gonna be a lightning rod of backlash. You probably wont see it for 10 years, mid 2030s. maybe even late 2030s.
No.228448
>>227963Wizardchan in its early years was definitely a crab website.
No.228459
>>227908i'd love to go for it. but unfortunately price will drop to affordable levels after few decades at best so we'll have to wait a bit.
>>228000if we won't have some nice longevity pill or something we won't get robowaifus. that's one of the saddest things ever
No.228462
for me willing to consider a sexbot, the bot would have to be super advanced, almost real, like a replicant from blade runner tier, like you wouldnt blink twice at it if you saw it walking down the street
No.228672
Pure, no point in fucking something that doesn't even love or comfort me, if anything I'd just feel worse after doing it.
No.228755
>>228672ya the amount of maintenance and post-use cleanup time is proportional to the shame I think. and from experience i know that there's a sunk cost issue that will extend it beyond when you'd normally just "throw it away and be done with it"
No.228758
Postnut clarity.
No.228791
>>228758i've never experienced it. is this something only low iq people have access to?
No.228792
>>228791nah you gotta have a male genitalia to experience it. you only have skin down there.
No.228801
>>227925This isn't a stupid thread.
if we are trying to find ways to help and fix our isolating mental and physical pain away this is good directions and I like these alternatives of "fembots" or other related ideas.
if succubi want to act like they are independent then full steam ahead! may fembots be real for the men!
No.228802
>>227908what do you mean sexbots could "cure" wizardry?
that implies you would no longer be a wizard if you had a sexbot
>maxxokay, that explains why you think that way
>or remain a pure Wizard?it doesn't ultimately make any difference
it's just a fancier sex toy
No.228853
>>228802>it's just a fancier sex toyThat's kind of why it fails. Men don't buy sex toys. No one is buying fleshlights and strokers or rigging them up to wiimotes and syncing them to VR for realism so there's no market for sexbots. No nintendo wiimen for you!
No.228866
>>228853These autistic companies don't understand it's not about a mechanical performance. It's about an actual living human succubus actually desiring you.
Until the bot can replicate that, it's just a humorous curiosity.
No.228867
>>228866Ironically you have to be autistic in the first place to think a chatbot is replicating a living being wanting you romantically, no matter how sophisticated the lookup table might get.
No.228869
yeah
No.228870
I wish I had a sexbot so I could exclusively treat it like an Edwardian housemaid down to the garb and strict social protocol. The servant's quarters/recharging station would be an alcove in the attic. I wouldn't trust it near the kitchen for anything but monitored cleaning, and it would only be allowed in the bathroom to clean the grout with a cat toothbrush. I'd smack its face with a cheap flyswatter as punishment so it's demeaning.
The less pretense of personality or free will it has, the better.
No.228886
>>227908This is the second time someone made a thread about sexbots on /wiz/ and it's a dead conversation that doesn't lead anywhere. You're not going to use the sexbots and no one else will. You don't even use BJ machines and they're 10x better than the *real thing.
You could try to build an MVP out of the handy and a videogame controller. Maybe a tiktok clone for short form porn and post it on 4/g/ and see what they say. See if you can create something you can post on 4/pol/ and other boards.
You're not going to do any of that and it's not going to end up on the news.
*in reviews