>>312765>i'm surprised by that given the comparatively higher carbsi don't even respect the macronutrient perspective enough to know what they believe is happening when 'higher carbs' enter the body.
unless it glues up the body something that is easily digested like banana will just flow through the human body like a river and the body will take from it what it can use and leave the rest to flow out. it's not like people study the energy content of their poop after it has flown through so you might be repeating myth.
>>312766>It worked and in retrospect I can see the high energy source was beneficial to the taski guess you don't even know who you could have become if you had rejected these industrial science experiences and opted for something better. to just describe the feeling of it: maybe you have used an old skateboard or worn down inline skates once in your life and knows how it kind of works but it it takes a lot of effort to go forwards because the bearings aren't clean and don't roll that smoothly anymore.
and then when you change out the bearings into functioning ones that roll very easy, suddenly everything is easier.
>Then you shouldn't have started slinging insults then asshole.this is such pathetic ugly-female-personality rejection-denial theater. that's how the ugly females do it. they start a conflict because they simply do not get the attention they want and then unless they are fled from, refuse to get the hint. play dumb and pretend, trying to get a conversation going and then slowly maneuver it into the thing they want to talk about. breaking the ice. well the ice is there for a reason, not for you to ignore it and keep talking.
if you had dignity you would not even care about these false-pretense compliance-based interactions and seek consent-based interaction. must be you growing desperate because nobody wants to talk to you. btw just to make it harder for you to play dumb: this is a rejection, not an invitation for further discussion.