No.297910
I can't stand people who are telling others how to live, despite themselves having almost zero life experience.
Which means wizchan's basement preachers who who don't know any real people, only stereotypes.
No.297924
>>297910I don't claim to know all. You can be religious or not, that up to you.
I'm just wondering if anyone presumably one of abrahamic faiths are just tired of humanity as a whole .
No.297926
>>297924Catholic here, yes, I do have moments of misanthropy but I view it as an irrational thing, even incompatible with the faith.
No.297927
>"[…]and overall restricting human rights"
>"abortion"…
There is an inconsistency here
No.297928
>>297927The clump of cells has human DNA, it's a living human
No.297930
>>297928Nah. If it can't survive in the outside world even in tubes, it's not a living creature yet, it's a cluster of cells.
Anything above 5 months (I think, maybe it was lower) can survive in a hospital in an intensive care unit. Aborting a 5 month old is by definition killing a human.
No.297935
>>297930>During in vitro fertilization, mature eggs are collected from ovaries and fertilized by sperm in a lab. Then a procedure is done to place one or more of the fertilized eggs, called embryos, in a uterushttps://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/in-vitro-fertilization/about/pac-20384716It satisfies your criteria, considering the fertilization (and inevitable development) takes place outside of the bodies, not necessarily in a tube, but any recipient.
No.298002
Misanthropy is the logical consequence if understanding human nature. Who wouldn't be disgusted by man, knowing his nature?
Natalism should be more selective: anti-natalism for the human shit who should have been infant mortality statisttics, pro-natalism for the actual humans.
No.298004
>>298002agree
it may seem inhumane to deny someone the right to reproduce, but there is far more compassion in preventing yet another miserable life, than in creating yet another miserable life