No.311700
amerikkkans have a bridge collapse and train derailment every week now
they're coping its because pajeets crashed into it
but if it was good engineering the whole thing wouldn't crumble so easily
lmfaoing my ass @ some random wagies driving home and suddenly going to underwater lol
No.311701
>>311700shitskin hindu cope
No.311704
>>311701Muslims framed us because they hate us Hindus and Christians. India has SJWs who love Muslims and ruin the Hindu Christams. we are so alike.
No.311707
Imagine you're driving home and the whole bridge collapses under you because of some indians on a ship. I wonder how that even happened since the shit they collided with is a rather big target that could be avoided from far away.
No.311709
>>311700>>311701>>311704why zre indians so goofy?
No.311715
>>311708Sir you will please not give us a play by play of what happen and make India look bad sir. Do not play by play
No.311717
>>311707At first I guessed they were sleep/drunk or something, but as more details come out that seems less and less likely.
I don't know what the fuck caused this. It's a whole other level of incompetence if it wasn't intentional.
No.311718
>>311717No, the Governor said they were heroes
> Maryland's governor said the ship, which was moving at a "rapid" eight knots (nine miles per hour), issued a Mayday call moments before it collided with the pillar of the bridge and that quick thinking by authorities after that allowed officials to stop vehicles from going onto the bridge."We're thankful that between the Mayday and the collapse that we had officials who were able to begin to stop the flow of traffic," Mr Moore said, according to AFP.
"These people are heroes. They saved lives last night," he added.
https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/all-indian-crew-on-board-ship-that-collided-with-baltimore-bridge-5314989 No.311719
>>311718Pretty sure he's calling the dudes who stopped traffic heroes not the guys on the ship
No.311721
>>311708now the mayor of this city is pleading with people not to share or view videos of this incident, and his cabinet has been DMCAing this footage despite not owning it. Suspicious!!!
No.311722
>>311721Probably to cover up that its not the Indians fault
No.311747
People should be shamed for giving birth to downies etc.
No.311751
>>311747christians think downies have human dignity
No.311753
>>311751As do Jews, Muslims, Catholics, and most atheists.
No.311755
>>311754No, there are atheists who believe this too… A lot in fact. Jews aren't allowed to abort Jewish babies no matter what, and inbreeding is so common among them and Muslims that both religions have special financial and care networks for their downie and other mentally retarded offspring.
But keep focusing your disdain on the only religion out of these 3.5 that is legal to openly mock and criticize in America.
No.311758
>>311723Uh ohhhh im gettin gang stalked!!!
No.311760
>>311751Have you actually been around or interacted with someone with downs?
They are still people. Dumb people sure, but not malicious so.
No.312424
Funny how the only true "freedom fighters" today are the Houhties.
No.312468
>High Court In India Rules That Viewing, Downloading Child Porn Is Not A Crime
>The Madras High Court recently in its ruling stated that solely downloading and watching child pornography does not constitute an offence under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) Act and the Information Technology law
>In January, the high court dismissed criminal charges against a 28-year-old individual accused of downloading such content on his mobile phone.
>“In order to constitute an offence under Section 67-B of Information Technology Act, 2000, the accused person must have published, transmitted or created material depicting children in a sexually explicit act or conduct.
>"A careful reading of this provision does not make watching child pornography, per se, an offence under Section 67-B of Information Technology Act, 2000," the high court had said.
>The accused had said the material was downloaded automatically on his WhatsApp.
>Senior advocate H S Phoolka, representing two organisations - Just Rights for Children Alliance and Bachpan Bachao Andolan, challenged the court's decision, citing provisions from the POCSO Act and the Information Technology Act.
>The top court said that if someone receives such material in their inbox, it should be promptly deleted or destroyed to avoid legal scrutiny. Failure to do so could constitute an offence under relevant laws.
>The Supreme Court permitted the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) to intervene in the case and submit written arguments by April 22.
>“Arguments concluded, and judgement reserved,” the CJI said.
Wiz SIRS the cunny won.
No.312474
>>312468Who cares what India does?
No.312477
>>312474Streetshitters and their (((white))) liberal allies, who else?