>>161294>cRaBdOm, that cRaBs are rightfully ignored>i offer a contrasting opinion, consider these things understanding that a wellspring of different female behavior would grow characteristics utterly different in such males (maybe they would be jock-like non-icky dicks, or something else, i suspect it wouldn't be any nicer than the hos of today, in a conventional society, hos were always lower in status, and required a man for survival, we cannot imagine the very different situation, where all men were superior to all succubi, and most succubi knew this in their essence - succubi are power-oriented)i dislike giving reports from the cRaB front (i am not precisely one, though i might describe myself as "crab in Christ", but that's not real crab), but it happens that i have observed a universality of behavior. a certain female preference. at essence, what creates attraction in a sUcCuBi's "heart" is ridiculously obvious and transparent, but I have come to believe them to be idiots regarding it, and I mean this sincerely, even female psychologists seem oblivious! guys at least are aware that beautiful sUcCuBi are attractive to them, and that not much else is very attractive (of what sUcCuBi actually do - sUcCuBi could make themselves more attractive, by being, for example, philanthropic, instead of tiktoking themselves putting on makeup). you know what those things are. i had uncertainty as to whether or not succubi ever grow out of the pattern, in old age - they do not. their perceptions of essential self is their original level of beauty, and their assessment of where males are placed is no less than:
1. is he dominant?
2. is he charismatic (= loud + in a current style + gift of gab)?
3. is he tall AND ("AND", not "OR") handsome?
4. is he rich?
and sUcCuBi are hardly people, but we must have compassion, remember, they are what they are, because it's what they are. their existence is one of continuous shallow desires, which drive them; simultaneously, fears overwhelm them.
makeup is easily explained, they become addicted to it, because it provides them with authentic praise. men genuinly give attention as a reward for it. guys would wear makeup, or take whatever pill it might be, if there were something offered to them. men have nothing like that. Shania Twain "That Don't Impress Me Much". no matter how much a guy accomplishes, or how rich he is, succubi still will not be especially pressed to praise him. And muscles won't do it either.
if guys could get surgery to become taller (yes, there's a way, but it's excruciating!), and if guys had some type of makeup that enhanced jawlines and some other hyper-masculine features, that was socially permissible, then men could achieve the same as sUcCuBi.
i have observed these things:
i have observed an old succubus whom i stopped to comfort becoming overwhelmed with another sudden social option appearing, in the form of a charismatic, tall, and handsome definitely-not-wizard. most amusing, i assure you.
i have observed a young sUcCubUs nurse reporting to the family that she had been holding the hand of a motorcycle crash victim, and talking to him. this to laughter, of course. but if it had been one of us wizards there would have been no hand-holding going on. he survives, and is tall, was handsome.
note no hatred for non-wizard bros who aren't dicks, and these guys were most certainly not dicks.
i have observed sUcCuBi crossing the room to chat up desirous males, according to the shallow rubric above, in a context where budding wizards and those likely to be nearly-wizards were passed up. at a church.
i have observed the bombardment of attractive females with attention and praise, from older men (in a non-flirtatious way). those men would not speak with a wizard, this is my observation. sUcCuBi are already lower in IQ, what hope have they of escaping such massive addictive social rewards? levels like that must be toxic, but none escape - 3rd wave feminism proves that perfectly well.
>>161288checked
>the actual topic of the thread, accusations of faggotryi understand your situation as well. it can be most disheartening to discover one is totally straight, given positive treatment by some gays, anyway. and, though i have never found any female friends, i have made tranny friends, online only, when i was naive. gays really are lucky, it's a fact. it's very funny to see gays trolling here and in the mgtow community. there are certainly guys who are fags and haven't admitted it to themselves, but straightness is real, contrary to what the fags of fox news and breitbart and those even more to the left than them would have you believe, and you know this perfectly well, and thus know by this that the entire psychological establishment is at best of limited merit, being ignorant of the commonest things, and seeing common things through the lens of degeneracy (of, if you prefer, "alternative living").
(my own case is, as you can see, opposite, because i'm seen as a top, but it amounts to the same weirdness, really)
>>161287you check out females, but they're not interested. they know you check them out, of course.
METAanyone else look into buddhism? surely sUcCuBi are for wizards, by their mere appearance in our lives, in images in the news and elsewhere, and in other literature/media, suffering. and christianity does nothing whatsoever i may tell to change them, a disproof of the concept of "there is neither … male nor female" - i can report no difference essentially in christian females.
>typed too much>post anyway