>>263696>you turnip dicks are the ones evoking pathos by trying to represent, something which the entire medical community considers a normal surgical procedure - as "genital mutilation"
Has it crossed your mind that perhaps what is thought to be normal has a cultural basis? All sorts of body modifications have and are considered normal in many different cultures even though they would be considered grotesque and abusive especially if performed on babies today in our own society.
Mind you, bans and discussions on banning ear cropping and tail docking on dogs and other such procedures on animals are far more common than opposition on inflicting unnecessary gruesome pain by performing permanent body modification on babies. It just shows how this is a matter of culture.>>263699
The equality is in principle, not degree. If you believe that people have a right to their own bodies, then you must be against circumcision, or any other sort of unnecessary and permanent body modification on people who cannot consent. The case of infant genital mutilation is especially grotesque because it is also extremely painful.
You are undoubtedly an evil person (or at least your motivations are evil) for so easily dismissing the psychological pain of those who have been subject to it. I might've easily been one of them, if my own dad hadn't stopped it, for which I am very grateful, and I do hope that one day such a procedure and any other like it will be deemed illegal to perform in babies unless there is real medical necessity.