/lounge/ - Lounge

>>312234
It was never even my own decision, I simply had no alternatives.
>forced to go to school
>get shit grades and other students and the teachers are sabotaging me in all kinds of ways
>try to fight back and get steamrolled by the system
>get out of school and try to get a job
>literally nobody will hire me no matter where I applied
>years go by and if you are out of the system for some years your chances go down even more of finding employment
regarding the succubi it was similiar, Succubi never showed any interest and I never felt like trying to pursuade someone that has literally 0 interest in talking to me, always seemed pointless from my point of view.

and thats how I ended up as a NEET wizard.
no clue what I could have done differently.

implying I had a choice being born an autist

>>316359
Does autism prevent you from being happy, or have you decided it's not worth pursuing happiness with autism?
I know it's a bit of both - autism is an obstacle in pretty much every area of life, and it can be very discouraging. But in the end, do you think it's possible for you to be happy with enough effort?

>>312234
Autism + Dropping out from school + succubi are too much of a bother for a not so big reward

No idea how can you even afford to worry about having no G.F or being lonely when you have bigger issues that occupy your mind

Most people seek relationships because they are deluded by desires that are mere manifestations of the carnal urges of an animal. Others seek relationships because of dependency issues. But rather than curbing their desires and dependencies, they define their whole lives around sex and romance. Because of the unhealthy fixation on courtship, most participants engage in toxic behavior, to the detriment of both parties. Whenever I point out the typical problems with relationships to breeders, they are quick to point out that some relationships are positive. However, the fact that most relationships, even those between intelligent, rational people, are doomed to failure from the very start proves that virtually no one has any capacity to tell the difference between a healthy and an unhealthy relationship. Almost every person believes that their current relationship is "the one," even though it is most likely doomed. It is obviously better not to fall for such illusions as romantic love, and to pursue higher aims instead. Whether you are a wizard by choice or by circumstance, you are spared from one of the greatest wastes of time and energy in our society. I reached this conclusion early in my life and I have been committed to the path of the wizard ever since. If nothing else, I will serve as a living, breathing refutation of our sex-obsessed society.

>>315133
<no i donnt (⁠｡⁠ﾉ⁠ω⁠＼⁠｡⁠)

>>315136
thank you <⁠(⁠￣⁠︶⁠￣⁠)⁠>

what else is new

>>312121
Yeah I have some unique kinks and fetishes. And yet I don't need to seek out a very specific type of porn. I watch very generic porn but just impose my own story on it, like my plot was what lead up to the current events. So power of imagination + 4k production combined its explosive.

>>312143
glad it works for you, my fetishes would require something visual, not just a background story, so I'm a bit more unlucky I guess

>>312120
the media provides you with that, you're meant to self-insert by default

crabs

>>311878
lol

>>314933
>he reaises HIS staff
>the full rest is THEM/THEY
cant believe how such trivialties take the joy out of pretty much anything. I guess thats what I get for beeing a corporate drone with all that language nonesense.

>>311767
Is the blue part his hair or is it a crown? Mystery.

>>314984
stolen phat

>>316313
I will remind you again that this isn't r9k on shitchan and isn't /dep/.
Delusional demoralization will be laughed at as being absurd here.

>>316319
I don't know what you're talking about and I suspect neither do you.

>>316324
he wants you to just improvemaxx bro and stop complaining, John Rambo had it much worse, just pull yourself by the bootstraps, you just need to be more productive

>>316325
I am so sick of your NPC shitpost you copy from place to place.

Think for yourself for once in your life.
Go make real observations of the world instead of regurgitating narratives you seen on the idiot box.

>>316306
Whatever happened to webcomics like this? Stuff that used to criticize the normalfags.

>>316324
He's a fucking retard.

Often it is instead a mutual contract of violence, signed in blood by all parties.

The agreement in post-revolutionary France was that the French common citizen would engage in violence on behalf of the state through the service of conscription which was legitimized because the leadership of the state would themselves be subject to violence by the people through public trial. Hence Robespierre's march to the guillotine legitimizing the Republic for a time and having reinforced stability in what would otherwise have been an internal collapse. Rather than the invisible entity of an entity declaring that it would kill you, this was the visible entity of a representative agreeing that you had the authority and legal obligation to kill.

The agreement of harvest kings in water empires being that the king had the right to distribute the resources of heaven because his office is akin to a priest and chief of sacrifices, and the king would lose the mandate of heaven in the event of a poor harvest and so would be sacrificed to the gods. The practice of sacrificing kings to the skies proved unpopular among kings who frequently changed state religions wherever possible, hilariously in the khanate of the Khazars which is one of the few examples of a non-semitic race being converted to Judaism en masse just to avoid the need to propitiate the gods with royal blood. Again, rather than the invisible entity declaring itself your absolute killer, this was a visible individual declaring itself the mediator of both life and death, accepting the power to mete out death in exchange for the death penalty if it could not equally mete out life.

A state is not only composed of its appointees, employees, mercenaries, and elite, nor of its borders and materials. A state is composed of all of its participants, including those held in chattel slavery. Unlawful violence within a state is often a state of violence dividing blocks of a state; this is sometimes dignified by the name of "civil war," even when against what are by and large criminal enterprises such as the opium growers of Afghanistan in their war against the Taliban. The fact that one army is illegal and the other is legal does change the nature of the conflict and does mean that the state is dysfunctional, but a state whose legal use of force is applied recklessly without an illegal army in the field in opposition is also considered a dysfunctional state, little different from one in whichPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

This is the topic for me since interfacing with hardware and dealing with operating systems is quite literally my job right now. Without operating systems we would be stuck with hardware that performs a very specific task. OSes allow the flexibility in computer programming that allows us to use out computers to do a fuck ton of different things relatively easily.

>>316075
It is because the way they interact with the hardware is wildly different.

Imagine there are two personal shoppers you can choose from, Pablo and Jason. They both can buy oranges for you from the same store. Their task is exactly the same, but you can only work with Jason because Pablo only knows how to speak spanish. This is similar in to how software can only work in operating systems that it understands.

From a techinical perspective, the complexity lies in teh software stack's architecture. At the fountation, we have the hardware itself. The hardware is constant and unchanging, like our store in the analogy. hwoever to interact with the hardware, we need software drivers, which are essentially translators between the application software and the hardware. The drivers send specific commands to teh hardware, instructing it to execute pre-programmed tasks on its chips. This is where we encournter our first major compatibiltiy issue: drifers are fundamentally different between oeprating system, which creates an immediate roadblock in cross-platform compatibility.

But the complexity extends far beyong the drivers. Above the driver level, there is a chain of operating system specific software components. A software applicatation must traverse through potentally hundreds of different software layers to ulimately use the hardware to accomplish its tasks. Each operating system implements this chain differently, using its own set of protcols, APIs, and system calls. To sucessfuly itneract with the hardware, knowledge of this entire chain for the specific operating system is needed. It is like knowing not just the language, but alsot he exact protocol for howt o contact your shopper, when they are available, what forms need to be filled out, and their preferred method of delivery, all of which will likely be completely different between Pablo's and Jason's systems.

>>316252
ok I got it 90% of what you said. So I hope my question reflect what I understood: Why are there different ways to decrypt hardware with software? let's take an example, I have a hardware that is made to do a task and is only used to do this task (so the only purpose for which the hardware was created is this very task) and nothing else. so the hardware contains components that are programmed to make the hardware work with software that will encode the components of the hardware and will be able to be retranscribed on the OS. why should we have another way to encode the hardware??
is there a chip/component with a program inside the hardware or is the software responsible for that?

>>316263

The hardware itself can only be controlled in one way, but the difference happens with the drivers, since it is software.

function processArray(arrayIn){
turn led1 on
move arrayIn to component memory
execute instruction 1
execute instruction 3
move result into output stream
turn led1 off
}

Anything that wants to use this driver to process arrays with that hardware component will need to know of this driver and its processArray function. Another OS will have its own drivers to do the same thing, but since the drivers were written by someone else the function names will be completely different. A program compiled for an OS that relies on the first drivers and that the corresponding will not be able to work with the drivers on the second OS. Yes, ultimately the same instructions are sent to the hardware but the program will have no idea how to navigate the stack to send those instructions.

The thing is that things dont need to be this way. You can design a OS that gives programs direct access to the hardware. MS-DOS and other early operating systems were like that, but that was found to be a terrible idea for security and stability reasons. I wouldn't be surprised if programs were easily transferable between OSes in the early days because of how simple things were.

>>316266
wait when you write an OS, you're also need to build a system that wouldn't be hacked easly?! Thta's insane because writing an OS is hard ,plus you need to know some defences over hack?!

>>316268
The only requirements you need to follow are the ones laid out by the customer. If security isnt an issue then you can make a super insecure OS. Most OSes in the wild are crazy insecure, but you don't really know about them because they are all on offline embedded devices where the OS only really exists to make it easier for the manufacturer to load programs onto it.

>>315899
can you play something you've learned?

>>316241
Lmao, do you really think being a hiki shut in will become some trend among normies? Are you delusional?

>>316242
>Never left the house for 15 years

Holy fanfic

>>316244
why it will never be?

>>316244
It already was a couple years ago, during the scamdemic.

>>316193
>>316188
'All within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state.'

Doesn't sound very free to me.

>>316207
>Doesn't sound very free to me.
This is why I prefer nationalism to globalism. If you don't like the laws just go to a different nation.
Even if the nation is crazy oppressive, you still have a chance of escaping as a refugee.
With globalism you're fucked unless you have a rocket ship.
No one governmental group should have that much power.

>>316210
>If you don't like the laws just go to a different nation
It's adorable that you think a authoritarian government would just let you go or that you have freedom to travel to other nations in such a situation.

>>316211
Like I said, you have a chance of escaping which doesn't exist with globalism.

>>316196
>Poland was the only country invaded by the Axis
>>316197
>german originally
Ioannis Metaxas was an honorable Fascist interested principally in uniting the ancestral land of the Hellenic races under an anticommunist state. When Hitler invaded his country, and Britain alone honored their commitments forged in peacetime, the tragedy of the 20th century was carved in stone for all to see.
>>316211
>and also this is where the german are originaly from: east Europe
The German people descended from Thule through the Hyperborean North. The ancestral origin rights only give claim to the Finnic and Novgorodian territories, far from the Caucuses which belong to a lower and less developed branch of the tree of human races.
Robbing a savage race degrades both the savages and the higher race. Simply look at the United States and to modern Russia to see how the morality of a state built on treason and theft has destroyed the moral integrity of their ruling races even in victory.
This is the reason Kaiser Wilhelm was ultimately correct to state Hitler would lead the German race to ruin despite the Kaiser's own (far deeper) comprehension of Jewish and Bolshevist subversions of German society. And why the rule of Monarchs and hereditary warrior nobility with separate (and even international) bloodlines has proven superior to all demotistic social successor-states, including Fascism.