>>223120>The posterwhich is probably you because you write in the same obnoxious way.
>Whether intended or no, the projection of his masculine self will always appear, coloring the psyche of his drawn female character male.never mind, you're not him because this is a simple and straightforward argument, whereas he only put forward convoluted ones, and though your writing style is annoying, it's still transparent, whereas his seems to be deliberately trying to obfuscate his arguments, probably because he's aware their extreme weakness would be evident if written in a clearer, more transparent style.
anyway, to address your argument, it is undeniable that every female character a male creator creates will be in some way shaped - or "colored", in your words - by his masculinity, but the way in which it is shaped is not in she being male, but usually in the sort of female he finds most attractive, or endearing, etc., both physically and psychically. so, for example, if he's specially attracted to females with large breasts and wide hips, then his 2d character is very likely to look like that. if he likes females who are meek and subservient, or maybe dominant and sadistic, then his 2d character is also very likely to be like that. and that is so precisely because he's not gay. so it will be "colored" by his masculinity, but in the opposite way of the conclusion you want to draw from it.
now, you might object that "you can't call that a female proper", as you say further below, because no succ is fully like that, but the same thing can be said of their physical appearance. no 3d succ looks like that because they represent an ideal of femininity to men that could never be physically actualized within the demiurge's world, and since that poster concedes that they are physically female when he says "in all but body, they are men", then using that same logic we also have to inevitably conclude that they're psychically female, even if no 3d succ's psyche could ever fully embody that ideal.
>See picokay, but what does that have anything to do with hume? if anything it seems very unlike hume to rely on holy scripture and fromit it to deny a sort of "univocity of masculinity" or of whichever other quality which can't be justified by sense percept
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.