No.224095[Reply]
Is a Wiz or someone who is walking through the path of Wzhood allowed to feel lonliness? Of course there's a difference between feeling lonely due to the lack of a succubus and feeling lonely due to the general lack of company, a sense of community and, so on, nowadays when i hear the word "lonliness" it's typically used in the context of romantic and sexual love, both are of course unwizardy, but you hear people (normals and crabs) saying that having friends is not enough for the feelings of lonliness to fade, ,they need a a G.F, I will talk about my self, for most of my life i was more than okay by being friendless and having a poor relationship with my family, and i almost never cared for having a G.F given how stressful having a one seemed to be, but recently i have been feeling painfully lonely, i look at works of fiction such as one piece, where luffy has a friend circle who are with him all the time, i can see why they say we are social creatures, i thought i was fine entirely by my self, but that urge to belong to a company eventually hit me, i can't escape my nature, i hate this urge even though it's purely related to the lack of social connection with family members and my peers nothing romantic or sexual, sorry for ramblings, i can't articulate everything well, honestly, i just wanted to talk about the subject of lonliness away from the "wtf no G.F" topic, and i wish to hear what you all have to say on the subject of lonliness.
61 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view. No.224412
>>224394Your beliefs are based on nothing. Your smugness and "stance" comes from a lifetime of indoctrination from your local community, otherwise you'd be just as likely to be a hindu or buddhist instead of christian.
How many hindus live in your community?
Yeah, none of you "chose" your religious affiliation. You're all products of wherever you live.
No.224413
>>224411Normals are all about objectivity and universal values, that's why we call them normals. They think everyone should adhere to some sacred values, be it having sex or having friends or trying to live by society's values etc. They get offended whenever they encounter anyone who is different from the so called objective idea of what a person should be like.
As long as you are spooked by terms like objectivity, truth and universal morals you are still thinking like normalfags.
>why don't you believe in love?Because I don't want to. Simple.
>>224412Learn to read, idiot. Which part of
>I don't follow any organized religion thoughyou can't understand? I'm not a christian, hindu or buddhist or whatever so your whole post is retarded.
>Your beliefs are based on nothing.Yeah, that was my whole point. Again, learn some basic reading comprehension. Beliefs are based on nothing. You can't prove anything for sure. So might as well just believe whatever you want to.
No.224984
objectively "reality" does not exist, but applying logical thought to your observed reality is not wrong either
neither is it wrong to consciously forgo logical thought when you want to
i apply no logical thought when deciding whether i want 2 or 4 sausages with my eggs when making breakfast, i apply no logical thought when dragging my drowsy body to work down the same route every day, i apply no logical thought when ignoring social interactions
i may apply logical thought to these things post-factum, but there's nothing in this world that could ever mandate that i do so, apart from me
and i know sure as shit that i am, at my core, not a logical machine, and neither is anybody in the thread
the worst thing any of you can do is assume that their logic is infallible, for it's rigidity and "correctness" is precisely what causes it to fail when you fail to consider at every step the entire complexity of whatever consideration it is that you're applying logic to, especially due to literally not knowing the entire extent of said complexity through no actionable fault of your own
atheism ("there is no god") can't possibly be a rigorously provable position
agnosticism ("there is no way to know if there's gods or not") is not an actionable position to force on people in order to deny specific beliefs they hold
theism ("there is some kinda god/gods") is not a concrete position but a massively, almost infinitely wide sea of different ones informed by cultural environment, persona ldevelopment history, and how many sausages i (not you, wiz) had for breakfast today and whether i sprinkled red pepper on them before eating, among an infinite multitude of other factors
if you passionately claim to have a truthier truth than this, you're just being rude even if you don't mean to
No.224985
>>224984This isn't even midwit level of pseudo intellectuality.
This is full nitwit stupidity.
No.224991
>>224984I have to disagree with your first premise, however coherent the rest of them may be. That said, one clarification
When you say "objectively reality doesn't exist" is it a refutation of ding an sich or the capacity to experience it?