[ Home ] [ wiz / dep / hob / lounge / jp / meta / games / music ] [ all ] [  Rules ] [  FAQ ] [  Search /  History ]

/wiz/ - Wizardry

Disregard Females, Acquire Magic
[]
Email
Subject
Comment

File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

  [Go to bottom]  [Catalog]  [Reload]  [Archive]

File: 1732458938955.jpeg (Spoiler Image, 1.21 MB, 4032x3024, 4:3, IMG_0123.jpeg) ImgOps iqdb

 No.220308[Reply]

How do I get rid of my desire to have children and to continue my lineage?

I’ve been able to eliminate my desire for succubi and stop fantasizing about romantic relationships but I still have a desire to be a father and at times daydream about having children to raise and play with.

I feel once I rid myself of this want I can truly be content with my existence as a solitary invisible man in this decaying world.
65 posts and 5 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.227179

>>221747
>Nobody truly and fully gets rid of the impulse and subconscious desire to multiply, because it's what hundreds of thousands of people directly up your bloodline did for eons and which ultimately made you exist.

This is not true, most succubi don't want to have children according to pretty much all surveys that I've seen, it's only men who are politically right-leaning that want to, and the underlying reason why is because it's proof of having reproduced (social status). succubi can reproduce easily so there's no social status to be gained. Anyway, you wanting to build a family is just a you thing, the older I get the more distant this seems to my mentality.

 No.227181

>>227179
>most succubi don't want to have children according to pretty much all surveys that I've seen
according to those surveys succubi DO want to have children but at a later age or stage of their lives once they've finished with their career and got a job a house, etc.

 No.227183

If you have a bad relationship with your parents, and look at it as your parents' genes not your own. have no loyalty to their genes.

 No.227184

Don't gamble with the life of someone else

 No.227191

>>227183
"your parents own your cum"

Do you even realize how stupid you sound?



File: 1732735556446.jpg (165.65 KB, 1625x482, 1625:482, stateofincelsrn.jpg) ImgOps iqdb

 No.220340[Reply]

20, 10 and even 5 years ago being called a virgin was seen as an insult by normies. Same could be said about being called "a crab", yet more and more often we see people who have regular sex, gfs and social lives say "they are basically crabs". Is it for attention? Is it some misguided idea that crabism is a mindset? Is it to make yourself feel "superior" to other normies? Same thing have happened with nerds: what used to be a simple demographic, later became a label to proudly asign to yourself (Oh, I'm such a nerd, I just love watching mainstream movies like Star Wars!).

Is there a way to stop it, or just every term loses it's meaning after 5 or 10 years these days?
68 posts and 5 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.227126

File: 1763361154093.jpg (45.77 KB, 735x412, 735:412, e1487a364441939ed8ade949ca….jpg) ImgOps iqdb

>>227125
Your point is now indeed clearer, thanks

>Oh I'm probably getting banned for crabposting today.

I think jannies will be very understanding today and you have nothing to worry about Anon

 No.227127

>>227126
Thank you too!

 No.227131

>>227124
Being chronically online poisons a mind and makes you forget the outside world isn't as hostile as you think it is.

 No.227134

>>227131
Yeah, that's what makes me hate post-2000s internet - everyone tries to hype you up with a scary "sky's falling AGAIN!!!" narrative for the clicks, to ruin your day for mere cents

 No.227135

>>227131
Depends on where you live. Might be even worse than you could possible think.



File: 1763272275976.gif (3 MB, 486x462, 81:77, 17615445786190.gif) ImgOps iqdb

 No.227116[Reply]

TL;DR AI got several points for me and I finally felt that the future is here! pleasant shiver


Quoting:


''The question "aren't you lonely" is considered rude because it implies loneliness is a negative state to be avoided, when some people are content being alone, and it can feel like a judgment on the person's social life. It also ignores the important difference between being "alone" (physically by oneself) and being "lonely" (feeling isolated emotionally). The question assumes a lack of social interaction is undesirable, which can be an uncomfortable and presumptuous assumption to make about another person.
It's an assumption of negative feelings: The question assumes loneliness is a universally undesirable state. However, many people are happy and fulfilled when they are alone, finding it to be a valuable time for rest, self-reflection, and connection with their "true self".
It ignores the difference between alone and lonely: There is a significant difference between being alone and feeling lonely. Being alone is a physical state, while loneliness is an emotional response. The question conflates the two, failing to acknowledge that a person can be physically alone but not emotionally lonely.''
''It can be a judgment on one's social life: Asking "aren't you lonely" can feel like a direct criticism of a person's social choices or life circumstances, whether they are single, have a smaller group of friends, or simply choose to spend more time alone. It implies their social life is lacking and that they should feel sad about it.
It overlooks the quality of relationships: The question focuses on the quantity of social interaction rather than the quality. A person may have many friends but still feel lonely, or have very few friends but have deep, meaningful connections.''
It is often perceived as a judgment on life choices: The question is particularly pointed when it comes to lifestyle choices like being single. Many people prefer to be single than to be in a relationship that is unhealthy or unfulfilling.

 No.227118

File: 1763274367291.jpg (68.9 KB, 860x430, 2:1, South-Park-Warcraft.jpg) ImgOps iqdb

>>227116
>The question focuses on the quantity of social interaction rather than the quality. A person may have many friends but still feel lonely, or have very few friends but have deep, meaningful connections.'' It is often perceived as a judgment on life choices: The question is particularly pointed when it comes to lifestyle choices like being single. Many people prefer to be single than to be in a relationship that is unhealthy or unfulfilling.

The first time i feel a connection with someone was when i played with a little succubus (two years before me, i have 13 years old here) with toys, tennis and other games, we just play alone in the countryside in solicitude without technology just being kids.
You know the later of the story, all got fucked and never happened again or talked.
>Also
The other time was with a asperger guy (they dont call like this anymore) cool guy, he wave to me sometimes at christmas times. We dont talk much, may he be happy.
>Warcraft
I made a friend of my country in a wow wotlk server, he's far away. We talk sometimes, a nice guy but dont talk to much of personal life.
>TF2
I was kinda loved as a personality in a TF2 community server, i enjoyed these times talking or helping others. Fun times.

 No.227119

File: 1763276856921.png (1.45 MB, 2048x1428, 512:357, 1741221224169.png) ImgOps iqdb

>>227118
thanks for sharing!


picrandom



 No.226398[Reply]

> According to Paul Dini, this was meant to be the first prime time episode. "Fox was going to run it. Then a Fox executive saw it and said 'What the hell is this? Batman's not in this episode. He's only in it at the end? The whole episode is two succubi running around in their underwear. There's no boy appeal here.' I said, 'Well maybe not any boys you know.' They refused to run it in prime time. Their idea of a perfect [episode] is 'I Am the Night.' That meets their criteria. It's dark and grim, with more of an adult feel and Robin was in it."

> Forget boys, are they even human? Are they even mammals? The only explanation for his is how they are lizard people.


> No, Lizard people also have sex. My guess is they’re some sort of plant creature that reproduces by budding.


> That or Warhammer Orks.


Network exec is absolutely right. Boys don't want to see some succubus power, thelma and louise, sisterhood adventure instead of Batman. Even if they do look sexy. If 7 year old boys liked that so much they could just watch MTV.

It's like because adult men like succubi, they can't even conceive there was an age, where succubi were lame and boring. Where the succubus character and episodes was lame.

They think boys favorite power ranger is the Pink Ranger.

https://dcau.fandom.com/wiki/Harley_and_Ivy#Production_notes
7 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.226513

>>226508

Yeah I couldnt get past the 2nd episode. There was some big shot hitting on stick figure MC. She has absolutely no redeeming qualities

 No.226522

>/wiz/ - My Redditspaced opinions on NORMIES I developed from a capeshit baby cartoon

 No.226548

>>226503
>I'm always shocked that people don't remember what it was like being a kid themselves, and what appeals to children.

say, a BOOMER would be slightly ashamed of his biker days. Would consider his old good days to be too dated. Would fail to recognize his 1960's fantasies are derived from the same archetype modern zoomers/alpha generation boys tend to enjoy.

>Adults make this mistake all the time with kids shows in general. Kids don't actually want to see children in kids shows, they want to see adults and teenagers, because they themselves want to be adults and teenagers. Yugioh for all its faults, gets this right, it's a bunch of adults and teenagers obsessing over children's card games.


Ah. A successful fella doesn't get his role models from TV. Neither books work though.
So, a guy who MANAGES is probably raised by a family of boring people.
(In layman terms: for such managers, white collar cushy position = success, respect; BUT, ALL WHILE a cool guy soving problems = silly bloke that comes and goes, no respect.)

 No.226600

>>226503
I think boomers were probably the last ones to understand this in the case of TV. I have been subjected to sorta watching kids shows here and there since 2014ish and holy shit they are bad. It's like if they made every show into some maddeningly braindead shit like teen titans go or fagventure time but for all kids to watch until they are like 15. Guess that happens when children's media is made by lesbians

 No.227076

>>226600
Random guess: the 'Murca guys are trying their best to mimic the stuff they don't understand - 1980s jolly anime / 1990s melancholic anime / 1990s straight up sad anime/ 2000s funny anime


and the process ends up in a mish-mash



File: 1763018662340.jpeg (401.54 KB, 1788x2500, 447:625, Centurii-chan-artist-SPQR….jpeg) ImgOps iqdb

 No.227067[Reply]

I happen to enjoy old music (so old it's "public domain").

Anyone else with me?

PROS:

* made for EITHER wealthy thinking people (classical music) or expresses emotions, full of effort (light music, folk music)
* can be enjoyed without ads
* IMPLIES being enjoyed without ads

even Dr. NakaMaths (e.g. a certain inventor of diskettes, Dr. Nakamatsu) enjoyed "meditating" by blasting full 1hr+ Beethoven No. 5

CONS: so posh normies will think "you're trying to act better than you are" whatever the silly head tried to convey.

 No.227070

Moved to >>>/music/10861.



 No.227001[Reply]

Do you think there's a difference between wizards who are willingly wizards, and those who did not truly choose the practice, the lifestyle, and the career?

What sort(s) of magic do the two types of wizards possess?

I feel the perfectly willing wizards have the better spells and magic, and are far more powerful, capable, intelligent, et cetera.

I believe there is a real correlation between what a wizard consists of and actual wizardry.

Are you one to study magic?
Do you know about magic?
Do you use magic?

Magic is the general study of any and all actual knowledge, and its application.
All arts and sciences might count as magic.

But, I do mean magic, too, as you probably understood the term.

Magic is used to refer to just about anything in this post.
Not just literal magic, but everything might be literal magic.

I'm at least two types of wizard, personally.

 No.227002

yeah its called insel vs volcel

 No.227003

>>227001
>Magic is used to refer to just about anything in this post.
This isn't perfectly clear for some, maybe.

The term magic is used in this/(that) post to refer to just about anything, is what I meant by it.

That should be amply clear.

 No.227004

>>227002
Yeah, that, too.

 No.227005

I practice various forms of magic, and am proficient.



File: 1761058151626.jpg (54.14 KB, 720x407, 720:407, 3bbff65e197adc0d3e8aef46f8….jpg) ImgOps iqdb

 No.226818[Reply]

Wizards, I'm really uncertain about my situation right now and would like your advice, since this is a matter that I think only you would be able to fully appreciate.

I was a NEET and borderline hikki for about 8 years during my mid-20s. I was very content during that time, because the NEET lifestyle actually suits me very much: I'm extremely introverted and don't crave many material possessions. Because of that, I never sought the social stimulation or the monetary compensation of work.

However, my situation changed and I had to find a job, as my prior source of minimal income disappeared.

I was very fortunate to find a remote job that pays decently, even though I only have a HS degree. I've been in that job for over 5 years now. Due to my aforementioned frugal lifestyle, I was able to save enough money that I think will last me over a decade.

With this in mind, my question is this. My greatest wish right now is to resign from this job and return to being a NEET. It's a question that bothers me every day. However, I fear that this job is sort of a unique opportunity, and that I won't be able to find anything similar, once I run out of money. I even considered doing things like day trading so I can extend the duration of my savings.

What would you do in a scenario like this? Keep your somewhat comfy WFH job or just return to NEEtdom?
12 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.226967

>>226964
I'm not sure why you would think I was larping as a data entry clerk of all things. I worked as one until a year ago. You are right that they do receive a lot of applications, but the entry level job market is at an absolute all-time low right now all over the globe

 No.226968

>>226823
>>226824
>>226825
>>226840
Thank you for this, anons. Really. Your advice helped me sorting out my thoughts and making a decision.

I decided to keep my job until I'm able to invest enough money to guarantee permanent NEETdom.

>>226845
It's a quality assurance job. I'd rather not go into more detail, but I can tell you that I found it through a freelancing platform called Upwork.

 No.226969

>>226964
>Today I will fulfill my destiny as the world's biggest faggot by demoralizing young men and calling people LAREPers

 No.226970

>>226969
You really don't get the state of the job market in 2025, do you?

 No.226971

>>226970
Saying "You just don't know" is not an argument. You need to prove your point. You won't do that though because you are gay.



File: 1750075238272.png (38.95 KB, 640x448, 10:7, figure1willoughby-1-w640.png) ImgOps iqdb

 No.224780[Reply]

Should I take the Catholic pill?

They seem to genuinely respect Wizards and have a tradition of hermits. Their priests are a celibate ruling class.

I didn't grow up around Christians but it seems like the difference between them and other Christians is that they're the original church together with the lesser known Orthodox Church.

I don't get all the rules they have though. You shall attend Mass on Sundays and holy days of obligation and rest from servile labor. You shall confess your sins at least once a year. You shall receive the sacrament of the Eucharist at least during the Easter season. You shall observe the days of fasting and abstinence established by the Church. You shall help to provide for the needs of the Church, each according to his or her own ability.

I'm overwhelmed. I get why people just go with the DIY protestant approach but it seems like if the Catholics are one of the original churches Jesus said was legit then it's a safer bet.

Look I don't get how there can be a miracle like resurrection either and frankly all the Abrahamic religious miracles seem really underwhelming compared to the wild stories of Hindu gods. But so many people believe in Christianity from a Pascal's wager perspective it seems like I might as well consider it.

At least it'll make me feel like I'm less LARPing some fantasy wizard and instead I'll seem like a faithful religious hermit which gets more respect points
18 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.226945

>>224780
Honestly? If you haven't by now, go to a few masses and see. Don't worry about the rules just yet.
Seeking God is the important part, and if you find Him there, you won't really have much of a choice but to look into the rest.
Try an Orthodox church too though before you dismiss the whole thing though if you find nothing.
I've never found much life in a Roman Catholic mass myself, just bits and pieces almost in spite of the rest of it, but I wouldn't have known that without going. But He speaks to people differently.

The rules are a complex topic. It's an attempt to use power/authority to force people to do things that are "good" for them by threatening punishment. But that defeats the purpose IMO. They are only good if you do them out of love of Christ and all the little christs around (those neighbors you're supposed to love as much as yourself), not out of fear of punishment.

I'm not sure how a Roman Catholic who is truly seeking Christ can internalize that. I guess if I could I would be one.

>>226011
For the Orthodox, priests are usually married because practically speaking the priests are the closest to the world and need to guide the laity through it. You're going to be a lot better at giving advice about rebellious kids or marriage problems or whatever if you've gone through that yourself.
Monks can also be priests though, and they would be unmarried. And bishops are traditionally picked from monks. So it's really only the parish priests and laity who deal with marriage.

 No.226950

>>224812
Literally no catholic thinks the earth is 10000 years old or whatever. The big bang theory was actually first proposed by a catholic priest

 No.226952

>>226945
The orthodox church is nothing but Putin's political proxy. In my country they asked the adherents to openly oppose NATO.

It has nothing to do with divinity, spirituality or gods.

 No.226956

>>226950
To be precise, Georges Lemaitre was an atheistic theoretical physicist whose day job was working as an ordained parish priest.

He solved the Einstein field equations and the Hubble-Lemaitre law is named after him
(with proof that the universe is isometric and rapidly & endlessly expanding, meaning eventually everything will cool down and die permanently).

 No.226958

>>226952
The Patriarch of Moscow does seem to be pretty fucked up lately.
But that doesn't really speak to the Orthodox church as a whole unless you're suggesting that the Patriarchs of Alexandria, Antioch, and Constantinople are all Russian plants somehow.



File: 1761829397508.jpg (781.7 KB, 1108x1920, 277:480, RWS_Tarot_01_Magician.jpg) ImgOps iqdb

 No.226924[Reply]

Today is my 30th birthday. I've been on this site since 2013/2014 until I left in 2023. I feel this chapter has been closed.
3 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.226939

>>226934
Oh well. Honestly, this is a formality. I've seen a bunch of these threads throughout the years, and I felt compelled to create one. It's good to carry on the tradition.

 No.226940

File: 1761857086225.png (130.05 KB, 500x500, 1:1, 1706154939748-0.png) ImgOps iqdb

>>226934
I stopped an power-tripping highlander from pressuring me by telling him I am 3rd gen fatherless


facts like that or wizardy are better off in a fight to scare off power-tripping yobs with that "fuck this whole street cred, i am loco"

 No.226942

🎲1d20[ 1d20 = 11 ]

 No.226946


 No.226954

>>226946
>>226946
I prevented a hazardous street-fight-starting argue from a dangerous-looking fella by telling him I am not just fatherless, it runs for generations + wizard status = he kinda enjoyed my 10-minute talk how people in big cities historically almost never seem to procreate enough to replentish the population thus making the city rely on new people moving in.



File: 1761645878452.png (734.1 KB, 900x872, 225:218, 6d65074afbb2a454e4f48c57f4….png) ImgOps iqdb

 No.226907[Reply]

I have a hunch there are companies that specialize on finding shy shut-in, *chan.org tier IT dudes that are good enough to do the computer stuff - and demand employeRs to do this or that set of rules.


See, employeRs also suffer from problems when they cannot actually fill a position, so they pay $$$ to a hiring company. A company that finds guys of this or that profile for them.

Corpo problems tend to go from bad to even worse when a bucko of a top manager demands to bring him some tidy, tie-wearing manager and never gets any. So an average top manager *has* to be told by such a hiring agency to "settle" for a neckbeard who does neckbeard tier life yet turns out to be tested with "puter stuff" proficiency.


If you can't get an interview for a cool position - maybe that's because you don't apply for a job in IT yourself in y2k+{25, …, 112}?
4 posts omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.226915

Your hunch seems shadier than the random texts I get about jobs on my phone.

 No.226917

>>226914
Since it's a HUNCH, I have to elaborate on the pieces of data I have

1. "Headhunting" agencies that hunt for proper workforce are a thing in the corporate world.
2. Recruting agencies also.
3. Agencies get $$$, big bucks, for finding a "right person" to fill an actual opening.
4. Corporate latter dream job has a problem sometimes: should a top notch clerk get promoted, the department loses the top notch clerk (minus productivity) and they need time to adjust for the new role.
5. The world of job applications has at least 2 foxy moves that ruin hones job search:

Uno. HRs are told to look for real cool people, but they don't really hire. The corpo suits want to pretend they're hiring new workforce *to trick investors into investing for implied growth*

Dos. A straight up robbery by the middle management. There is a project. They require X people. They hire X - 1, "iks minus one" heads, tell every applicant for the seat number X "you're not good enough, you lack some soft skillz that are detrimential"… or some other excuse… and then, the middle managers tell both the higher-ups aA D the guys at the project things are looking grim: there are little to no good people available so you should settle for an unpaid intern to do routine stuff. Then, the middle management demands extra $$$ for "managing" the problem and saving $$$ in salaries not paid in process.

 No.226921

>>226915
Exactly. I was talking about tech-related hiring on the wrong board.

 No.226944

>>226917
Headhunters don't give a shit about an unemployed job seeker. They contact people who already have high status jobs to work in even higher status jobs for better pay.

 No.226947

>>226944
Beingg a NEET is the most "high status" job there is.



  [Go to top]   [Catalog]
Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[ Home ] [ wiz / dep / hob / lounge / jp / meta / games / music ] [ all ] [  Rules ] [  FAQ ] [  Search /  History ]