/lounge/ - Lounge★

the worst part about being a dysgenic freak is that you're still expected to put effort in your appearance, get a good haircut, shave, have good clothes and style. yes, you're revolting still, but you have to "respectable", even if it looks ridiculous and you just want to give up completely.

>the worst part about being a dysgenic freak is that you're still expected to put effort in your appearance
If "the worst part" about anything for you is that other people have opinions on it (in your case they EXPECT you to upkeep, or they will JUDGE you with their opinions on you (OH NO!!!)), then you've failed as a celibate adult male.

>>317679
damn, i even failed at being a virgin loser…

>>317677 (OP)
It doesn't matter if you don't care or ignore it


Let's compare being ugly and short and indian to having cancer, it makes no difference if you don't care you will still suffer as a result from being ugly short and indian.

The world is superficial, nobody cares if you're a good person or intelligent unless they can exploit you for it.

What matters is always what's on the surface for other humans.


>>317680
you can't fail at that, I'm a 30 year old virgin loser with no skills and chronic health problems too
I never had a chance at being a norper or having a social life let alone a girlfriend

>>317678
I already gave up entirely, I am good.

>>317681
I am not chasing over succubi nor applying for any jobs so I don't need looks, not like there is much I can do about my facial features if i really needed to "looksmax" for pragmatic reasons

>>317681
Due to how invasive Indians are, I'm forced to interact with several short, fat, ugly, balding Indians every day and they all seem pretty cheerful to me. Maybe you're just a crab?

>>317683
>I don't need looks

Your looks already shaped your personality and your life, it influences how others perceive you including your parents from the moment you were born, in fact, most of your identity is based on it.

It's the one thing that dictates your life. A negative or positive force.

>>317684

Notice how you mention most negative aspects about them
>several short, fat, ugly, balding

as opposed to only one that can be said to be good
>cheerful

And you thinking they're cheerful doesn't change the fact that they will have shitty lives mainly because of their looks.>>317684

>>317685
>they will have shitty lives mainly because of their looks
How? How does being ugly directly negatively affect their lives? What are the consequences?

>>317687
https://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/03/health/ugly-children-may-get-parental-short-shrift.html

Not that poster, but here you go. There are studies spanning back decades showing parents even prefer showering an anonymous good looking boy or succubus baby/toddler with affection over their own kid, if their own kid turns out physically ugly.

Physical ugliness triggers primitive biological disgust mechanisms. Some of these parents can simulate affection or love for a while, but the mask slips after a year or two. Unattractive children are also at a very high risk of physical abuse and violence from parents compared to good looking children.

Humans really are just one big collective feedback mechanism. They are collectively obsessed with biomarkers and physical features that are attractive or costly, and shun asymmetries, ugliness and visible imperfections.

>>317689
So it *STILL* just boils down to "people won't use as nice words with me as they would with a beautiful person, they won't want to shower me with gifts as often, and I won't have an easy time wooing an attractive mate".

Superficial issues for superficial people to whine about online. All of these studies are flawed in that they're conducted by race-blind delusionals. Most Ugly children are born to ugly people, specifically inbred and mixed-race groups. These ugly peoples come from ugly cultures where infant discrimination is normal. Sharing these flawed studies with down-low guys on the Western internet will only feed in to their idea that they're being treated bad at all, and that it's because they're not a 10/10 pussy slayer as opposed to it being because they're acting strange.

>>317693
everything affects something
an ugly child might be unjustly treated worse, which might leave a permanent mark on his mind, extending to adulthood and worsening his quality of life
come on, don't act like you can isolate looks and make them not matter at all
though I agree that looks don't matter that much in adult life because adult people are generally more, well, mature
but still, your childhood has an effect on your adulthood

>>317687
bullying, trauma, neglect, and niggers like you who gaslight them claiming that looks don't matter when wizards know the opposite is true.

>>317693
You make it sound like it's so easy to just not be hurt when people treat you poorly for being ugly. If that's the case for you then good for you, but that's not the case for everyone.

What a odd thing to be proud of.

I have always been of the mind that one should be proud of their actions and accomplishments.
Pride for anything else is misplaced if you ask me.

>>317693
Lmao. I'm white-white (literally Fitzpatrick 0 on the skin scale) in North Europe and got bullied for ugliness not only by my own parents but all other kids and adults as I grew up.

Stop trying to make it sound like ugliness can't affect whites.

>>317697
Exactly. The uglies who constantly bottle it in, never react and still force themselves out in public to be mocked by other students, adults and randoms, are the ones who turn into school shooters and terrorists.

Sometimes there just isn't a solution to making your life better, unless you can afford loads of plastic surgery and cosmetic skin procedures to look normal.

Sometimes the solution IS staying inside and avoiding everyone.
The morons who gaslight you into thinking looks don't matter and you're just being superficial are damaging and harmful people who don't have your best interest in mind.

>>317693
You have no clue what you're talking about. See this: >>222338

>>317734
Please learn how to cite posts properly.

>>>/test/4892

>>317683
>not like there is much I can do about my facial features if i really needed to "looksmax" for pragmatic reasons
for the most part no, but if youre skinnyfat (or just fat) there actually is. i lost like 40 pounds simply by walking and eating less junk and my face changed quite considerably. i still look unconventional and weird but i never realised just how much fat was around my chin and jaw, it was pretty gross.

>>317798
I was *somewhat* normal weight, but losing 20lbs from that, made my jawline and cheekbones pop to the point father said I look like a different person.

One can only imagine how big the difference is if you have 40, 60, 100+ pounds of extra weight.
Losing that will change you into somebody else.

>>317799
yeah, and dont think just because youre tall or dont look obviously fat (with clothes on) that this isnt the case. i was stupid and thought it was just my bone structure (lol) when in reality those bones were hidden by stealth caches of fat.

theres also that toilet roll analogy: "initial weight loss might seem minimal, like removing a few layers from a full roll, but as you continue, each layer removed becomes more noticeable, leading to significant changes over time". so even if youre average weight, every incremental lb will change your face more.