/lounge/ - Lounge

>>319772
thats some good money

I am a third worlder about to be kicked by his parents, I would appreciate if someone could guide me on how to earn money online. I have no skills, I know some basic coding but ChatGPT codes like 10 times better than me.

I have tried things like UHRC and Clickworker but I could never earn anything, even the documentation was too complicated to understand and act on for HITS. I didn't even get paid, and got no tasks for my third world country so half of the payment systems and jobs aren't even available here.

And also my parents are draconian, if they realise that I am earning than they will demand all that money for themselves, and I really need the money for medical emergencies, I have problems in my spine, vision, and mouth(teeth). Which is why I had to find ways to transfer it to me in such a way that no bills reach my parent's house, and that they don't show up in my current bank account.

If I could earn like 250USD or even half of that per month it would be really helpful to me and if I can earn like 250USD a month in a stable way than I might even manage to move out and live on my own.

Is it even realistic to earn that much? I feel like there are no jobs left online for a third worlder like me, and of course I understand how entitled I am being for asking for a job while not having any notable skills, except that I speak two languages, but then again maybe my skills in my non-native language aren't good enough.

>>319790
Unfortunately the real rational answer in that situation is get a real job, even low tier ones.

>>319787
No, affing is when someone buys something through your link, on Amazon for example.

The problem is driving paying traffic to your affiliate linkz. That costs money.

Moved to >>>/b/1018971.

Merry Christmas!

Thanks for the pony fanart.

Moved to >>>/b/1018798.

>>319657
More liek Murgay Cockbard

Moved to >>>/b/1018506.

>>319596
They are not the same coin at all. Religion relies purely on personal faith. Science relies on repeating an experiment millions of times until you get the same result so many times you can present the model to a university or pharma company as a fact.

Do you want to put a medication in your mouth some random weed smoker "has faith in" versus one that has been scientifically demonstrated on millions of people to work on whatever ailment you have?

In terms of credibility and value, if we keep using coin metaphors, the scientific theory is like a solid platinum gold eagle, and "hope" is like a maggot infested wooden penny.
In other words, "hoping" something works with absolutely no experiments or research behind it is worth nothing.

>>319597
It's ironic that this entire post was based on your blind faith in science. You didn't examine yourself and verify yourself everything that science claims as truth. So again, you are just speaking on faith alone.

>you can present the model to a university or pharma company as a fact
That's about selling yourself basically. There are charlatans going around from house to house selling their magic potions and they can convince others to buy their shit. That doesn't mean they are telling the truth necessarily. Same case here. Just because you are able to convince others of your truth doesn't mean you are right automatically.

>Do you want to put a medication in your mouth some random weed smoker "has faith in" versus one that has been scientifically demonstrated on millions of people to work on whatever ailment you have?
Honestly, depends on the circumstances but generally I would avoid both of them. The "random weed smoker" may actually give a better medication than your official high priests aka scientists. Let's not pretend that science is perfect, there are millions of people who have been ruined thanks to imperfect scientific methods and technology. I'm not talking about cases when science is clearly aimed at causing suffering like in the case of weapons but when science is supposed to help you. ""Official"" methods, medicines and technology often end up having negative side effects instead of helping as intended.
You keep referring to authority (scientists and experts told so!), to simple numbers (demonstrated on millions of people!!) but neither of these mean anything at the end. Truth isn't based on how many people believe in something or how high the status of the person is who claims something. You can be prof dr dr super brain and yet still lie intentionally or unintentionally make errors. How do you know that the Moon exists at all? Were you ever there? How do you know that it's not just a lie invented by your scientist aristocrats to manipulate the people into believing something that is suited for their agenda? You can never convince me to take everything science claims as truth for granted. I didn't personally investigate and check any of those claims so I would be a retard to just believe them without hesitation.

If you are still the science Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>319595
i did a science degree too but have come to realise it is all much more shaky then the professors let on. Most papers are absolute dogshit. Especially when it comes to pharma, there are conflicts of interest, blatant corruption and bullshit data analysis everywhere. The quality of science has collapsed and professors are just trying to churn out papers as fast as they can with total disregard of quality. If they get uninteresting or weak results they are pressured so much they have no choice but to try to spin it as something worthy of publishing and citing

>>319608
youre just being contrarian to that poster on purpose. in reality you accept all the fruits of science in your life because without them in your natural state, you'd have died at like age 11 to some stupid disease like polio or typhoid fever, or food poisoning.

>>319622
You completely misunderstood me either on purpose or unintentionally. I'm not talking about living life in nature without technology ala Unabomber. It's not contrary to my position to accept the "fruits of science" as you say it. My point is that you shouldn't idealize science and shouldn't let it be the compass of your life and worldviews. Many people just take everything scientists say for granted and that's not different from believing some guru or priest and this kind of blind faith just leads to more retarded people walking this Earth. Essentially only creates followers and sheep who are reliant on a small minority of "aristocrats" who are always "right" in everything. Just like how the pope is supposedly always right in important things…

>youre just being contrarian
And you are just stating the mainstream opinion of the status quo. You deserve a medal for behaving in a socially accepted way.

I hate when wage slaves at the store act like it's your fault for not understanding shitty directions they give you. Today I was in a store and I start to go up to a succubus sitting at one of the registers. She looks annoyed and points me to her right (my left). The registers there are all empty, so I look even further to the left in a different section of the store where there's another counter and register with a dude there. I start going there and she tells me angrily, no not there, the empty register is where she wants me to go. All the while acting like I'm the retard for not knowing she wants me to stand at an empty register when there are multiple employees already standing behind registers. Like succubus fuck you, at least have the decency to act like it's your fault for asking me to do something retarded, not mine.

https://jiggie.fun/jBNpxn

lets puzzle
pic is OP pic, couldnt think of something better

>>319555
I hope you at least said something mean to her. I hate it too when I go somewhere and the people who are there all the time act like me as a complete stranger should know exactly what the little rules of that place are. I'm here for the 1st time, man, why do you expect me to be familiar with shit here?

>>319559
It took the two of us over six and a half hours to let the cat in from the cold

>>319568
that was fun

>>315805
anyway if you post pic of you can get banned

>>315807
Ah, It's true, I read the rules that I must be anonymous.

i found you a girlfriend, pick one

>>318548
Where did you get that image from? And where are these strange succubi from?

>>315805
Powder was such a strange but good movie.

>>318882
Seems like everything online is so fake we can't trust anyone or anything.

>>319195
Sounds like a plan to keep the Caucasian working class isolated, divided and weak.

>>318263
BUT SOMEONE CALLED THE FBI
THE DAY
THAT 4CHAN DIED

LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Fucking told you, the plan is to repeatedly split the userbase to kill both 4chan and altchans until everyone is VOLUNTARILY crammed into shitcord, twatter and any already heavily policed (both by users themselves and with AIs help of course!) platform.

>4chan might never open up again
So it's up again. Don't you drama obsessed people feel stupid?

>>319035
>You don't need to force yourself to look at that shit for hours every day, you just remember they exist and think to yourself, huh wonders what's happening.
You just described two habits. Pornography use and imageboard browsing are habits we have developed over time. I do intent to modify them as routines can be changed.

>Are you really? If you were curious, reading and thinking about the subject (studying) wouldn't cause so much discomfort that you would rather avoid it despite the negative consequences.
I find this a dangerous logic cause being adverse to change/challenges are you going to gaslight yourself that you don't really want to to anything other than laying down and rot?

>>319040
>You just described two habits. Pornography use and imageboard browsing are habits we have developed over time.

Right, you developed the "habit" because you kept doing it, and you kept doing it because……? My point is that there needs to be a reward, "something worthwhile" in the activity as a prerequisite, otherwise no "habit" can be formed. If an asexual man looks at porn every day, he won't develop a habit because it's inherently un-pleasurable to him. You won't develop a habit of studying, unless you can get a reward through the activity i.e. genuine curiosity that gets satisfied by reading and thinking about the subject. Perhaps it's possible to cultivate such a thing and I think that's a more well-defined problem than "I'm avoiding doing the work for some reason, how do I continue bashing my head against the obstacle until it gives in?"

>I find this a dangerous logic cause being adverse to change/challenges are you going to gaslight yourself that you don't really want to to anything other than laying down and rot?

I mean, that's one option. Maybe not studying the subject you don't care about is the most rational option. Best case scenario, you somehow force yourself to memorize a bunch of facts to pass a test, and you're then stuck in a unsatisfying career path where you have to trick yourself using 20 different strategies in order to sit down to do the work. Someone that is genuinely curious will always outperform you because all his energy is directed towards the actual goal, rather than 99% of it being wasted in internal conflict that makes you want to procrastinate.

>>319028
The only way I can get actual work done now is to be away from the internet. I just cannot focus at all otherwise.

I have started dabbling with dowsing. Found a four leaf clover. Thinking of hunting for treasure. Maybe when I found enough treasure I'll buy a boat and seek treasure at sea and fly the black flag, lots of booty at sea I reckon. I have noticed your luck at dowsing increases when you practice no nut. When I fap I just have no luck, but when I retain the dowsing responses give me the chills. This is the secret to success become a real wizard and hunt for treasure. We could live like kings. WE COULD LIVE LIKE KINGS

>>319149
Dabbled in dowsing myself.
It's more of training your senses and subconscious to basically use whole brain processing to give binary analysis.
Takes a ton of practice to become consistent and reliable.

Can't see how no fap could possibly help, but dowsing is pretty personal so if it works for then it works for you.
My advice is that the more knowledge and experience you have with the thing/answer you are trying to find and the area you are searching the better and more consistent your results.

Also dowsing the ocean is very difficult even when using map dowsing. Don't know exactly why but I have a few guesses. Most related to the tons of salt water creating interference and lack of intimate knowledge of the floor of the ocean.
Both might be overcome with enough time at sea.