/lounge/ - Lounge

>>320190
>>320191
>>320192
These thoughts are such a burden every single day with the sexual-romantic hole in me… Maybe I should just jerk off to loli again. It bothers me that the artists study actual little succubi though. I respect poorly drawn loli for this reason. And if I draw it which I've always avoided, I have a perfect memory and I will be practically doing so even with mere glimpses in the corner of my eye from months ago as well unavoidably.
To tell you the truth, it has felt like the world is trying to poison my mind when I've pulled away from it. For instance one day this person pretending to be my mother (my real one is in another world) seemed to be possessed and masturbating in the living room. I snapped and jerked off to loli for the first time in a while right away. If this sort of thing is a test, I don't want to pass.

>>320208
It's true, it's called sexual targeting error, the ideal would be you chasing a succubus, or succubus chasing man, because that what produce children, once you deviate from that you basically are a deviant and wants to fuck something that doesn't produce a child, that's evolutionarily wrong and pointless.

>>320214
that's retarded
so why do most normalfags fuck most of the time with no intention to reproduce, using birth control, even primitive methods like "pulling out"?
according to that logic nearly all heterosexual normal sexuality would be deviance, and only a breeding fetish would be precisely the only thing that is not a fetish

>>320216
Heterosexual sex between two young adult male and female is the gold standard behavior that mother nature puts in ours genes, but we aren't purely brute animals, we can think and rationalize, yet a many pedophile (be both homosexual or Heterosexual pedophile) can't control themselves and go on to abuse or prey young kids, it's a sexual deviance, that either need to be treated or the person if dangerous enough need to be put down or lock up

>>320217
most heterosexual sex, even between young adults, isn't concerned with or directed at reproduction
neither is sex inherently about reproduction, since in its primordial form reproduction is asexual and has no need for sex

>>320218
For us, humans, it doesn't make sense to have sex with something that doesn't produce a child, is evolutionary stupid and pointless, it doesn't mean that all sex should be about reproducing a child, but by default the natural e correct way is to be attracted to someone that you can reproduce with, that what mother nature put inside of our monkey brain, once you deviate from that target, it's stupid and pointless at best, to downright dangerous and criminal at worse, the far exaggerate version would be that has sexual attraction to some inanimate object, like a car or something, it's very clear that the person need help.

>>320211
I've been reminded the world is all wrong, I'm going to jerk off to lolis again! Thank you to whoever posted clown piece on this site so long ago, that's what got me on it in the first place. HAHA about the name, obviously "ZUN" had beings intruding on his mind picking this name.

I'd share a pic I like but I'm jealous of everything in my sexual thoughts.

>>320221
yeah, that's true, i don't know where i was going with my line of thought
however, i think i'm still more negative than you about the sex drive directed at reproduction, as i still would see it as a just a ruse by "mother nature" to propagate the species (and not for any of the lofty fantasies of normalfags such as love, happiness, etc.)

>>320225
you must be strong, wiz, and resist the urge to fap to lolis
i myself haven't fapped to lolis in 19 days
remember what >>320217 said,
>we aren't purely brute animals, we can think and rationalize

>>320217
Moralfag

>>320246
Degeneratefag

>>320247
Fair enough, but it is what it is. Still don't really see the point of playing the "look guys Im so nice and normal" card.

>>320248
no play, only rational mature thinking..

>>310206
Man, Western slop is not loli at all, is just fuckign garbage.

I have a theory that there are 2 types of lolicons: moe-inclined ones, and porn-inclined ones.

Moe-inclined lolicons like lolis because they're cute and innocent, and they also like "normal" (teenage) anime succubi if they're very cute too. When they think of the concept of lolis, they think about cute things, not lewd things. When they fap to lolis it's to vanilla or softcore material. The kind of material that if you randomly looked at it while you're not aroused, you wouldn't find it gross. All of them are otaku.

Porn-inclined lolicons see lolis as more of a fetish and as fap material first and foremost. They fap to less vanilla and more gross content, including (but definitely not limited to) gangbang, etc. They like mesugaki, which is an abomination that contradicts lolis' innocence and makes them comparable to adult whores. They're also likely to be into degenerate shit like traps, shota, western """lolis""", and maybe even worse (if you get what I mean). Not all of them are otaku or care about anime in any way.

Most of the discord zoomers who're self-proclaimed "lolicons" or spam the crying emoji uoooh shit fall onto the latter.

I learned this the hard way after interacting with a "lolicon community" for months.

>>320990
I never considered the type 2, the appeal of lolis is the innocence and cuteness.

>>320990
but why would type 1 even fap to lolis if they’re not sexually attracted to them? men don’t just fap to something because it’s cute. that would just be denial.

>>321007
That post doesn't say that type 1 can't find lolis sexually attractive. They do, but they *primarily* appreciate them for their cuteness.

>>321027
liking lolis because of cuteness doesn't make you a pedophile
that post is already presupposing that type 1 is sexually attracted to them
so if you don't fap to them or don't have any desire to do so then you're not being included in type 1

>>315505
Normalfags once again prove they're unable to form their own opinions. All they can do is reinforce the common consensus.

>feeling attraction to female kids without sexual developed characteristics isn't pedophile

My brother in Demiurge, that's pure unfiltered pedophile of the worst kind, that's a sexual deviance of highest order, seek help.

>>321092
>playing violent video games isn't murder

My brother in Demiurge, that's pure unfiltered murderer of the worst kind, that's a psychological deviance of highest order, seek help.

>>321092
>>321101
>2D is same as 3D
yeah… sure… very offensive and dangerous.

>>320190
>'pure maidens' 'defiled succubi'
Yeah and then what are you? Are you just better and cleaner than the rest of humanity? kek delusional.

>>320990
>grown men inclined to feeling pleased from drawings of children
Both are evil.

>>321101
I disagree with this comparison. An fps is simply a test of skill. You can reskin doom as shooting nerf guns or petting kittens and the challenge would be the same. The same can't be said for Loli content. You can't change loli to anything else without losing its main appeal the same way you can reskin a mario game or something. Not that I think loli should be banned or is evil, but the comparison just isn't good.

>>321101
succubus detected.

Is playing a violent videogame the same as watching gore? If I kill an animal in Minecraft, does that mean I want to kill animals in real life?

Only normiefag amerimutts think that loli=pedophilia, their comical obsession with moralfaggotry is rooted in their old christian puritanism, except it has lost its original meaning so it's unrecognizable now. If loli was the same as pedophilia you would think people in other parts of the world would be staunchly against it, but it's only mainly in the USA and a few Europeans thanks to Amerimutt influence. Zoomers love to moralfag the most since they're the most right wing generation, they're also the most hypocritical since they're the biggest degens out there. The more they show off their trad larp, the more likely they're into all sorts of hentai, not only loli but sometimes actual disgusting shit like futa or netorare.

PS: I think another big reason for this moralfaggorty is feminism, hags hate seeing men lusting over younger females so they obsess over this shit and it spills over to the fictional world as well, eventually the obsession over hunting pedophiles is even greater in men not because they actually give a shit (it's all performative) but because they're scared of being pedos one day. The actual pedos are the most scared so they point fingers constantly, it's the same closeted faggots used to do back when being a faggot was socially unacceptable.

>>321828
>but because they're scared of being accused of being pedos one day.
fixed the typo, another loli for the inconvenience and Happy spooky month to all wizards, even to the moralfaggy ones :)

>>321828
>Chinese astroturfed "safe loli" gacha iPhone casino game image
>AMERIMUTTS AND ZOOMERS AND RIGHT-WING TRADS AND FEMINISM
lol. lmao even. Go guzzle gutter oil chink.

>>321828
It's because hating on things unironically feels good, that's why people keep finding dumb reasons to be anti-something especially post civil rights era, and in the age of internet where everybody gets more and more out of touch with reality, the reasons for hating a group of people also gets dumber and more artificial.

>>321830
it's probably just coomer brain damage, but I wish pedophiles didn't feel the need to spam every board they frequent with lolicon images. It's obnoxious having to see pornography in every thread, in every board.

🥳🥳🥳

>>321849
heard there's a bunch of asterisks to that regardless, like obscenity laws, state laws, etc.

>>321849
If this is the main attitude here and a part of the Wiz identity then fuck Wiz.

>>Admin
>If anime featuring [small succubi] is too much for you to bear ["small wo.men"]

>>321867
>fuck Wiz.
AUl wizzard don't fUCK

>>321868
Who the fuck bans adult onna but lets this shit through?

>>321870
>Who the fuck bans adult onna
?? Not wizardchannel

>>321828
>Zoomers love to moralfag the most since they're the most right wing generation
most of their moralfagging is coming from a leftist, progressive place.
you even bring up feminism further, and while the issue of “hags hating men lusting for younger females”, is an important aspect of it, in most cases the way it manifests is that these progressive ideologies are internalized by young impressionable teenagers as an abstract and absolute set of commandments about which they become fanatical zealots. reading reddit threads is extremely fascinating to see this mentality in action. I once saw one about asuna ichinose from blue archive, who is effectively a modern depiction of a fertility goddess, but they were accusing it of being “the sexualization of a teenager” because her canon age is officially listed as 17.

These Europoors are reigning down on loli specifically again. A German federal auditing company that has the 'final say' authority on obscene artwork has told Cloudflare that they are to withdraw hosting from any website found to be serving loli… Even if that website is hosted in the USA. Just another reason that European tech companies and web services earn more through fining U.S websites than they do through support from their own people.

France has just informed the Chinese government that statuettes and dolls resembling small succubi are peadophilic, and so sex doll, anime figurine, BJD, and plushy manufacturers have immediately discontinued production of some of their most popular designs. All for being too short (about <130cm), even if they have major boobage and child-bearing hips.

The UK has banned videos filmed by Islamic child rape gangs, not because it's child porn, but because such videos are "Conspirational misinformation and A.I-generated hate that targets the vulnerable Muslim community". Children have recently been arrested over expressing on Twitter how they no longer feel safe.

>it's the tradlarpers who hate loli!!
>it's the redditor lefties/progressives!!

It's both. Truth is there is no mass political movement that is accepting of this kind of thing. But both left and right are the same on this issue in the West, it's one of the things they agree upon fully. Some jewish marxist succubi came up with the idea in the 19th century or so that pedophilia or anything sexual that involves children is the biggest sin in the world and this meme got planted into the heads of retards since then, regardless of political sides. It's really funny in way, watching both lefties and right-wingers accusing the other of being pedos, haha.

And to that poster here who posted shit about what is right or wrong when it comes to evolution…There is no right or wrong way to live out your sexuality. You can be into fucking cars and you can get your pleasure from putting your dick in exhaust pipes and so what? Who says that's wrong? In fact everyone knows this deep down and people who want to set a "normal way" to live sexually for everyone had to resort to religions in the past because there is no other way to convince others really about why they should cater to your subjective sexual preference.
Now this guy is the same too, he just uses the word "evolution" and "nature". But nature doesn't care whether you reproduce or not, it's not some intelligent design. You have sexual urges in you and the need to achieve sexual pleasure and orgasm but that's it. Whether you jerk off in your room or you have sex with adults or rape people or have sex with corpses or animals or objects etc it doesn't matter to nature and the universe doesn't give a shit whether you reproduce or not. The fixation on reproduction, thinking that sexuality only serves as tool to reproduce, is a big load of crap, along the lines of religious thinking.

If evolution and nature really only allowed such things to exist that are beneficial to life and reproduction then why is homosexuality or any other sexual preference possible that results in no reproduction?

>>322513
archive.org has no Cloudflare booshi
neither does torrenting (peer to peer)

I legit assumed this whole "ENTORNET??? NA HOI ON NUZHON?!?!" meme is a Russian meme. But, turns out, 50+ aged succulents haet interwebz as some kind of a meta-rival

>>301033
>Since I am on this site I know what it's like to be a misfit which taught me empathy so I try to look at every situation from multiple angles but I am really unsure on this topic.


quite a topic to avoid touching, then…

>>321939
> I once saw one about asuna ichinose from blue archive, who is effectively a modern depiction of a fertility goddess, but they were accusing it of being “the sexualization of a teenager” because her canon age is officially listed as 17.
She looks healthy and beatiful to me.
>>322519
>And to that poster here who posted shit about what is right or wrong when it comes to evolution…There is no right or wrong way to live out your sexuality.
>Now this guy is the same too, he just uses the word "evolution" and "nature". But nature doesn't care whether you reproduce or not, it's not some intelligent design.
>If evolution and nature really only allowed such things to exist that are beneficial to life and reproduction then why is homosexuality or any other sexual preference possible that results in no reproduction?
I live in Latin America, where having sex at an early age is already normal, especially in lower or upper social classes with absent or irresponsible parents or families. And I've seen how they turn out.
My only fear is that they will end up becoming hypersexual or brainwashed. I know that early sexual awakening is associated with hypersexuality, abuse, and even drug use or addiction to pornography (ignoring vaginitis, sexual deviant behaviour, young pregnant etc) So, honestly, if we lived in a more educated and less degenerate era, I would accept it a little more, but it's still sickening to me.
>Why?
Bacause i dont trust humans and them corrupt everything.
My concern is not sexuality, but rather the long-term effects it will have on someone who is too young and stupid.
Did I explain myself clearly?I've seen too much shit in this shithole.
>But 16 or 17 or 15 is… and these are doing this in internet and..
I dont give a shit about that, i not talking about that.
My context is not morality or religion, its more like the human development in the strange curve of human life. The early sexual got fucked up life styles and mind rare behaviour at times.

>>322529
drug abuse, addiction to porn or sexually deviant behavior is not wrong. You don’t have to say you’re from a shit hole if your caveman drooling retard ideas about morality from 5 centuries ago already give it away.

>>322530
You're not a wizard. Go back to discord.

>>322531
being against those things doesn’t make you a wizard it makes you a turbo normie

>>322530
>drug abuse, addiction to porn or sexually deviant behavior is not wrong.

look, a degenerate sexhaver in my virgin board lol

>>322529
>My context is not morality
Your whole post is made up of assumptions that are based on your moral views, you can try to appeal to psychology or whatever but psychology is also biased towards moral context.
>they will end up becoming hypersexual or brainwashed
99% of people are "brainwashed" by default, regardless of childhood sexual experiences or not. Same goes for being "hypersexual". This isn't related to pedophilia at all, not an exclusive effect…But ofc, society likes to pin everything on a minority group, well let's say everything is the fault of big bad pedo, lol even if it has nothing to do with them.

You also seem to idealize virginity, or rather you associate it with a state of innocence, which is bullshit again. Just look at the userbase here for example. Just because you are a virgin doesn't mean you are sexually pure or whatever, you can have weird fantasies and can fap to videos of dead chicken or whatever shit.
>young pregnant
That's the healthiest kind of pregnancy, only in the modern world it is the norm to have children when succubi are over the age of 30 or so. That's why there are so many retarded and crippled babies. If succs gave birth in their early teens then our people would be much healthier.
>sexual deviant behaviour
This again is moralfagging. You want us to believe the norm lie that the only acceptable way to live out your sexuality is to get together with a succubus your age and I think that's just a shit ideal to begin with.

>>322530
Drug abuse is debatable but "sexually deviant behavior" and porn addiction are completely harmless things only normalfags and succubi whine about.

>>322541
>you can try to appeal to psychology
Young ones are retards and morality is not working at this context.
>young pregnant
>That's the healthiest kind of pregnancy
The young mothers childrens here are generally retards. maybe false in a way to you but i dont know if is bacause of poor-cultural or some biological thing related to early pregnant (It doesn't even make sense to me that biologically you would have children at a young age, for God's sake, with a higher risk of death during childbirth, heart problems if you have a certain type of operation such as a C-section or vaginal delivery, calcium loss that causes your teeth to fall out worse than an adult's, and a long etc of medical-health problems and fucked up shit.) The only reason they possibly survive is because of technology.

>Same goes for being "hypersexual". This isn't related to pedophilia at all
All the turbo-sluts I know were abused and sexualized as children. I don't know if it's a coincidence. its like the sexual thing is normalized as child and as adult just become the worst type. And when they're not, they're sexually exposed to all the crap and sexual bombardment on social media and technology.
>You also seem to idealize virginity
nah, we have crabdoms here but its not like the old idea of purity of cristianity of something like that.
>sexual deviant behaviour
>This again is moralfagging.
I didn't know how to write this, I mean that they expose themselves sexually by acting like hypersexual whores. And it's already the norm, it's not even that we have a deeply Catholic context in certain places, and I think it has to do with sexual abuse.
>Why?
Because they were exposed to the idea that sexual exposure at an early age is completely normal. In poor environments here, it's already normal. I don't know how it works with the rich, but it must be the same if they are that disinterested.

>Drug abuse is debatable but "sexually deviant behavior" and porn addiction are completely harmless things only normalfags and succubi whine about.
You're retard, right?
It's the same logic that poor mothers here use when their daughters get pregnant, or their sons get hooked on drugs, or die after being civil revenge executed for robbery.
>Why did this happen to my son?
It wasn't because of depression, maybe some trauma or a shitty culture or crappy genes, or pure retardation for sure.
I'm tired of them normalizing this shit.