[ Home ] [ wiz / dep / hob / lounge / jp / meta / games / music ] [ all ] [  Rules ] [  FAQ ] [  Search /  History ] [  Textboard ] [  Wiki ]

/wiz/ - Wizardry

Disregard Females, Acquire Magic

  [Go to bottom]   [Catalog]   [Return]   [Archive]

File: 1676652245291.png (28.45 KB, 336x543, 112:181, lol.png) ImgOps iqdb

 No.202591

Normie internet is so fucking dumb. Let me explain why 63% of young men are single. The raw disparity in men/succubi who consider themselves single is 4%, so its not due to polygamy or differences in reporting between the genders. Even now exclusive gays are like ~3% of men and ~1-2% of succubi, so it's unlikely that is a substantial contributing factor.

So unless some of you have been living under a rock recently, the answer is clearly female hypergamy. The crab wiki (https://crabs.wiki/w/Hypergamy) explains this fairly well.

 No.202592

It's tough out there for wizzas. Some of them haven't gotten laid in MONTHS!

 No.202593

File: 1676652737173.jpg (450.59 KB, 1602x1212, 267:202, median-income-by-age-sex-i….jpg) ImgOps iqdb

men and succubi's incomes are more even when they are young, and if hypergamy happens, many of the single men will be bitchless.

 No.202594

File: 1676652851856.png (60.22 KB, 512x348, 128:87, woman.png) ImgOps iqdb

succubi in high earning brackets (99th pctle+) disproportionately have high earning husbands, much more than the men do - https://sci-hub.ru/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.104115

 No.202595

>>202591
> LGB Men 62%
It's gay zoomers who are disproportionately single.

 No.202597

File: 1676653605072.jpeg (26.51 KB, 262x346, 131:173, 820D7F86-B800-4314-80FE-9….jpeg) ImgOps iqdb

I should probably just write this in a new thread but IDC fuck your faggy statistics and crab shit OP.

I don’t want to have sex. The idea of intimacy with another human being revolts me. There is nothing appealing or appetizing about penises or vaginas. They are revolting, they smell awful, they are covered in piss and hair. I don’t want to be touched, let alone while naked. The thought is is paralyzing. I don’t care how gentle or soft a succubus could be, anyone touching me is cause for fear and violent reaction. I’d probably swat at someone touching my cock just on reflex. And other sex acts seem worse. No I don’t want to put my mouth on a disgusting pisshole. I don’t want to put my dick in anyone’s asshole, even if it was the cleanest one on the fucking planet. I can’t imagine wanting to lick another human’s body. It’s all so revolting me. It instills a primal fear.

 No.202598

File: 1676653626628.png (30.47 KB, 458x316, 229:158, comp.png) ImgOps iqdb

https://www.ifn.se/wfiles/wp/wp1146.pdf - succubi who get promoted are more likely to divorce

"Our estimates imply that aversion to having the wife
earn more than the husband explains 29 percent of the decline in
marriage rates over the last thirty years." -> https://sci-hub.ru/https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjv001



>>202595
even in the zoomers the exclusive gays are like <5

 No.202599


 No.202600

>>202598
>even in the zoomers the exclusive gays are like <5
Could have fooled me.

 No.202601

Being a virgin or having had like only one sexual encounter between ages 18-30 is a lot more common for men these days. It's just not a thing that men openly talk about because they don't wanna look like dorks while crab types are so obsessed with sex that they can't think about anything else. There's still a lot of normie men who openly talk and meme about this stuff.

The reality is that a whole lot of normie men are struggling to find a relationship, let alone "casual" sex. succubi always have a way higher "bodycount" on average if they are sexually active but there's also still a lot of succubi who don't sleep around casually but the latter ones are usually in a stable relationship quite early and they don't slut around.

I don't wanna make this too crabby but if you are really desperate for a relationship then your best chance is to look for succubi over 30 who didn't manage to find a man, they will be cynical and make you feel inadequate while being way older than you but they'd rather be with you than being alone, you'll also get the whole "you're nice and not like the bad guys who always fucked me" energy. I'm just bringing this up because I saw a lot of guys go down that route.

Most men have to make severe compromises (old succubi, sluts, open relationships, mentally ill succubi) or they don't get anything at all. The succubi who are not retards usually settle between 18-25 and they just go for the guys who have all their shit together and treat them well, this might not be the norm everywhere but it still happens and those kind of couples are quite wholesome to see to be honest.

The people who are obsessed with sex usually end up miserable in my opinion but were gonna have more and more of that as everything is so terribly oversexualized now.

At this point all this hypersexual bullshit is like a weird movie and we're sitting in the front row to see it, not knowing what the fuck the outcome will be but it sure drives people crazy. Let's just sit back and wait how the lives of hypergamous succubi will turn out, I have a feeling that they are sabotaging themselves.

 No.202603

>>202597
I also find it disgusting
>>202599
Shut up, nigger
>>202601
You're very wise
I think settling for a used roastie defeats the point of a relationship, which is to form a permanent and fullfilling bond

 No.202606

Yep. And they're in high earning positions because of affirmative action and high levels of needless credentialism. Social network and conformity determine whether you'll make it through postsecondary as much as int

 No.202608

File: 1676660851006.jpg (70.5 KB, 929x1024, 929:1024, akko.jpg) ImgOps iqdb

>>202598
It would be interesting to disaggregate the other 71% of affects, as I suspect the change in marriage is a reflection of institutional change, i.e. marriage rights conferred to captured identity groups in the expansion of state biopower. There's also a hidden line on this graph, which is the (admittedly small) reciprocal rise in informal marriages. These informal systems are more interesting than the formal system, as what replaces or reconfigures it will come out of that space, as it did in the medieval era from romantic literature and courtly love

 No.202666

single != virgin
we have hookup culture, that's why most ppl are technically "single"

 No.202822

File: 1677164772553.png (126.46 KB, 561x447, 187:149, FpnhNm1WYAY__-w.png) ImgOps iqdb

>single men double the number of single succubi
What did they mean by this?

 No.202826

>>202597
>They are revolting, they smell awful,
How would you know this, """"tru""""wiz?

 No.202828

>this is why normalfags arent in relationships as much anymore
>this is why succubi blah blah

dont care lmao

 No.202829

>>202597
Are you an OG TruWizza™ from back in the day?

 No.202830

>>202666
I doubt many people are having sex, there's a study out there point out the people are having less sex compared to before, so probably a lot of people are single and sexless

 No.202831

there's lots of single men now due to the female sexual revolution and feminism, it wasn't succubi who were the driving force behind it but naive males who thought they would be getting laid now that all females are whores
surprise the females now control sexual market and only fuck top 1% of males and ignore the rest, these ones who reproduce with top males also produce top offspring which get the same Chad or Stacy traits, therefore creating a eugenics-like (or eugenics-lite?) effect where females can instantly tell a male is low value by their physical and emotional traits
what ends up happening due to this are the traditional role reversal of society to the extreme - there is literally no need for non-Chad men anymore since females are the ones who do all of the sexual selection
so it doesn't even matter if you choose to ignore succubi, it's not like they would ever pick you anyway so virgins today can't even claim to be volcels

 No.202832

The thing that actually explains it is succubi are marrying older men
>the difference is 4%
that's duplicitous, you're throwing in established couples from earlier gender dynamics to dilute the obvious imbalance among under 30's

 No.202833

>>202831
Never belived in the "volcel" meme, I think the only man that can be a real pure volcel are only the truly the top tier guys, like the dude is really good looking and well off, and the succubi go after him, if the guy is not any of those, then he's not a vocel.(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

 No.202835

>>202830
No normalfag will sit around and be content with living the sexless life. He will either go to a whore, rape someone or kill himself or settle with a fat or old succubus.

>>202833
Seeing how everything is determined in this world and that free will is a lie, the volcel and crab distinction is bullshit anyway.(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

 No.202837

>>202835
>everything is determined in this world and that free will is a lie
Back to /b/

 No.202839

>>202837
Free will was invented by idealists to justify the misery of the oppressed proletariat and the privileged lifestyle of the elite. "We are rulers thanks to our efforts. You are unfortunate because you are lazy or not talented enough." It's part of the cozy "Just World" package capitalists, idealists and right-wingers love so much.

The idea behind free will is to guilt trip people. "You could be like me, successful, you only need to try harder!" or "You could be a different person if you wanted to. You just have to want it badly enough, bro."

Baffling how some people still believe this nonsense in this day and age.

 No.202840

>>202833
only crabs care about the crab/volcel terms because their thinking are still part of the crabsphere, volcelism is just a crab cope for knowing succubi will reject you anyway if you try
so in the crabs who call themselves volcels eyes they think they are winning by not playing the game, but they would lose the game anyway if they try

just celibate and wizard is enough to describe your virginity without having to rely on crabsphere thinking of us vs them(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

 No.202841

I'd like to reiterate that denying the validity of being voluntarily celibate, and making any implications that those claiming to reject sex by choice are "coping" or lying, is a rule 4 violation and will result in bans.

 No.202852

File: 1677187351794.png (7.38 MB, 1500x1994, 750:997, ClipboardImage.png) ImgOps iqdb


 No.202855

File: 1677192838763.png (298 B, 640x360, 16:9, ace.png) ImgOps iqdb

Posting this image to rub it into >>202840 .

 No.202861

>>202855
what does being a transexual have to do with being a wizard?

 No.202862

So the implications of this are that a fairly large percentage of men must be dating more than one succubus. Older men must be dating younger succubi.

Rich and successful men are able to attract succubi easily and they take advantage of it by dating multiple/younger succubi. Not exactly groundbreaking revelations there nor interesting topic for conversation.

 No.202863

>>202855
you ruined the moment posting some gay sexuality identity flag.

 No.202869

Never understood the wizard x crab beef.

 No.202870

>>202869
associating with crabs leads to thread such as this. threads about:
- succubi
- relationships
- dating


it emboldens crabs and they begin posting annoying shit, first being ambiguous and vague, but when called out for what they are, a crab, they:
- become enraged and admit it (and get banned)
- shill the crab narrative where involuntary virginity is the only kind of virginity, where on the contrary it's YOU who is the crab
- explain away 'volcel' as meaning specifically 'chads' refusing sex
- call you gay for not wanting to have sex with a succubus
- say something something 'cope'

 No.202871

>>202870
I don't think the thread in itself is bad and most posts are not in crab fashion. Looking at the whole shift of things in the world is just interesting and there's only a few who say dumb shit about coping and they do these things regardless of the topic.

 No.202872

>>202666
The hookup culture isn't as big as they want you to believe and the numbers of men who are not partaking is steadily increasing. The number of people who actually meet different people to have sex with is not as big as it seems.

 No.202874

>crabs™ (with a capital I and a trademark symbol) are a cult. I mean that in a 100% literal sense. They have their own saints, their own jargon, their own purity tests, they disown/punish apostates (just look at how they react to crabs who eventually escape/have sex), and most importantly, they prey on lonely people. I feel like most people don’t understand this about cults. Cults don’t target stupid people, or evil people, they target LONELY PEOPLE. . . . I think a major issue that has perpetuated the crab problem has been the mixing of the term to mean both the cult of crabs (the killers and their followers) and guys who just can’t get laid. I would say the majority of crabs fall into the later [sic] group, they’re just socially maladjusted men who are struggling with dating.

 No.202875

>>202870
>>202870
But what's the difference between a crab and an unwilling wizard?

 No.202879

>>202875
don't mind them it's just normalfags who hate virgins, they also hate volcels but can only hate on crabs on publicly without getting banned

 No.202880

>>202870
you unironically sound like a bitter failed crab bro

 No.202885

>>202870
good post

 No.202886

>>202880
>>202885
The duality of men

 No.202887

I see now the discrepancy in what I've been observing. Whenever I mentioned how at wizard level (age >30) I noticed nobody else in real life is really that much of a wizard. Even the autist nerds I know in real life have transcended wizardry by now. Most guys didn't turn out to be massive losers but became something of the stereotypical old man boomer.
It incites furious rage among the internet crowd when i said such things. It's clear to me now these are the under 30 kids who are 63% single.
It seems the data reflects my observations after all. I am something of a rarity among my cohort. Where as it is normal for younger generation.

 No.202888

>>202875
what do you mean unwilling? unwilling to remain a virgin, as in they want to have sex? that is a crab

>>202879
>you're just a normalfag
adding that to the list of things crabs say in response to being called out

there a countless other websites and communities that love discussing why they are virgins, why succubi wont fuck them, why dating is weird, etc. wizchan might have it roots in all that, but every change to this site throughout the years has gradually gotten rid of that stuff

really, the only thing that is present now is crabs whining that they arent happy being a wizard, and they get away with it because its sufficiently vague that you cant say they are talking about life in general vs virginity in specific

i dont use 'volcel' because crabs have a definition for it that involves being a 'chad' and rejecting sex from succubi. i also dont use the 'ince…' word because crabs define it with weird requirements i dont care about. i type crab, the literal crustacean, and by crabby crab i mean a virgin that wants to have sex. by wizard i mean a virgin that doesn't want to have sex. you can use the -cel words, but they are crab culture from other websites with additional meanings and associations i simply dont give a shit about

 No.202892

>>202888
>crab this
>crab that
>I hate my userbase, that's why I powertrip
>need to become more inclusive mo diverse need mo monies etc
Yeah, I know what normies are about

 No.202893

>>202888
cool it with the crab hate not everyone is a sociopathic narcissist that wants to be above other virgins for christs sake
you said you've been using the site for 10 years but still stand out like a triggered normie reddit/Twitter sjw everytime you type, we don't want to see your bitch whining about crabs anytime
us adults talk about virginity

 No.202895

I'm autistic to the point where I know having a relationship is just a sailed ship. But I'm also at a level of attractiveness and functioning where I sort of have no apprehensions or insecurities regarding succubi and my standing with them.

The men on the bottom end of the bell curve that blame themselves I just don't understand. There's nothing particularly wrong with them, or anything particularly special about the succubus who they're unable to get with. Few of those crabs are unhealthy or "genetic failures", you'd struggle to find one that was physically limited by his body in performing tasks. Are you -really- telling me the single mother that lives on welfare and has kids out of wedlock is just too good for one of those crab manchildren? Fucking no, strip away the welfare state and within a year or two he'd have a girlfriend because the government isn't there to play daddy.

I don't really partake on crab sites, but they're literally 100% right about their predicament. I don't even blame them for lashing out violently. I think there's something worse in the opposite, the ones that genuinely crave love and companionship and then spend their entire lives going to the grave thinking "they're not good enough". They all seem to miss this societal superstructure that has emerged since the 1960s that has stripped away their role in this world. succubi don't need them to provide, they don't need them for protection and there's financial incentives in place for families to break apart. A mass shooting of impotent rage IS a more healthy expression of your grievance than just being a sterile drone wagecuck forever or becoming a fentanyl statistic.

 No.202896

>>202895
crabs are alone because they have no redeeming personality. Why do these normalfags rely on others to validate their existence? I cannot even feel sorry for them to the point I find them bizarre.

 No.202898

>>202888
Do you really think that wizards are willing virgins? Like, for real? Wizard don't behave like crabs, that doesn't mean all wizards willing virgins, many have problems that hinder their potential.

 No.202899

>>202898
>do you really think that -all- wizards are willing virgins?

Fix'd

 No.202908

>>202895
Failed normies should off themselves instead of dragging those they envy down with them at random. I have nothing but disdain for failed normies as they are essentially turbonormies who obsess over normie values and desires more than anyone else while also being too stupid, shallow, and inept to find anything fulfilling to do with their time. Crying that their life means nothing unless they are assigned a succubus, pathetic.

 No.202913

>>202893
it's not hate, just realizing what makes wizchan good is the lack of all those things i mentioned. and so when they make those threads, they are dragging the site down, back into the swamp. this is basically a meta thread at this point so i can bitch and whine. i don't care if you disagree, you can go to r9k or other sites if you appreciate that type of discussion

>>202898
>Do you really think that wizards are willing virgins?
male virgins that don't want sex (wizards) are willing virgins, yes. that is what the word means to me. if they wanted sex and were unwilling to remain a virgin, they would be crabs. many crabs dont act on their desire (ie simply paying for a prostitute to have sex) because they have other simultaneous desires for intimacy, a real relationship, and so on, but that doesn't mean they don't want sex. they want sex AND other things, but are unable to get both

 No.202916

>>202913
My nigga you are extrapolating the meaning of the "wizard" in that context, that means basically that the dude is over 30 and virgin, it doesn't say if the dude is willing or unwilling, you're just projecting. But then again, I think there are plenty of unwilling wizard here, but don't go full crab mode.

 No.202917

>>202916
>My nigga
Please don't call random users niggers. It makes you sound underage and could give normalfags the impression that they're welcome here.

 No.202918

>>202916
it's my own definition to the word. i 'm simply letting you know what i mean when i say 'wizard'. you can make fun of me for it but you can't stop me

 No.202919

>>202917
>>202918
>Wizardchan users are collectively known as wizards, although the more precise terms are apprentice wizard and wizard (for 30 years or older virgins).


You're wrong, you just projecting your own view of things, and that view is wrong.

 No.202920

>>202919
explain what is wrong with me having my own definition? we all have private definitions. you say x and mean something completely different to when i say x. the only difference is i explicitly defined it. that is supposed to eliminate all potential confusion, but you instead angry about it? i don't understand what you mean to say

 No.202923

>>202920
That every wizard is a willing virgin, which is not true.

 No.202950

>>202920
>>202918
>>202913
There is way more wizards (30+ yr old virgins) on insels.is and R9K than here. And they don't talk shit about volcels or other virgins like here.You still have what like 5+ years to become a wizard? Lmao we really should raise the wizard age to 40+ so people like you will never become a wizard.

 No.202952

>>202923
they are literally by my definition willing virgins. you have to just accept that when i say wizard i mean something different from you or everyone else. i am not saying every wizchan user is a willing virgin by the way, wizards and wizchan users aren't the same to me

>>202950
i doubt that, but i don't know about any of your claims from other sites. i don't care about those sites or their culture enough to find out their attitude. i do know the crabs that post on wizchan aren't so innocent and peaceful. i also know wizchan is different enough that they no longer considered wizchan to be within the crab-sphere, this was years ago. you also know nothing about me outside this thread, baselessly assuming things like my age serves no purpose

i have nothing else to say and it seems no one else has anything either, so i'm hiding the thread and moving on

 No.202955

>>202923
Well, willing… I just started not giving a damn and piss off succubi since my autism was only getting me more and more worried about blending in with no results. In the end I realized that many things were never worth chasing.

What we call wizards here is, or so I expect, the type of virgin (mostly after 30) that doesn't give a damn anymore, being this healthier than becoming an insel

 No.204051

>>202831
Eugenics is a matter of opinion. If you think that men being over 6' is very important, then female selection is eugenic. If you prefer that men are hardworking and reserved, then female selection is dysgenic. I guess you could argue that the traits favored by succubi are eugenic by definition, since they increase the chances of reproductive success, but by that definition every non-random mating process is eugenic.

 No.204052

>>204051
if height is so great, why didnt humans just evolve into giraffes 1 million years ago?

 No.204053

a LOT of 'straight' guys are fucking guys secretly

 No.204054

>>204053
no, that's just your gay/female fetish

 No.204067

>>204052
Height is overrated. If you're tall and broad, you need a shitload of calories to sustain yourself and you're more likely to starve in a bad winter. If you're tall and lean, you get toppled in a fight and get your ass kicked.

Short, wiry people are generally healthier for longer when they work, I've noticed. Their knees don't fuck out and they're less likely to throw out their back.

 No.204068

Who cares about normies and succubi, What a crab OP is. Its all so tiresome man.

 No.204070

everyone knows this by now.

 No.204074

>>204070
>everyone knows this by now.

Then only ones who don't see it are the typical reddit and twitter types but they are just lying to themselves.

 No.204079

>>204074
these communities started on reddit, even before r9k existed

 No.204326

I remember as a millenial, all the sexoligists talked about was "hook up culture" and how there was so much sex.

I'm glad to have lived to the age of weirdo zoomers, who just play Fortnite and talk like 4channers and wizchanners. Its like the whole world is a big Wizchan /b/ now. The use the same weird lingo that I don't understand. I'll take insanity over normies.

 No.204327

>>202593
I don't interact with enough succubi to know much about hypergamy, but I would say that the availability of porn and video games also play a role. Not much reason for a man to go outside and mingle with succubi if he doesn't want to.

 No.204328

>>204327
I didn't mean to quote

 No.204329

>>204326
wtf are you saying?



[ Home ] [ wiz / dep / hob / lounge / jp / meta / games / music ] [ all ] [  Rules ] [  FAQ ] [  Search /  History ] [  Textboard ] [  Wiki ]