File: 1641559262107-0.png (619.48 KB, 1256x3136, 157:392, perception.png) ImgOps iqdb
There was a spectacular thread not so far ago. Some wizard shared his wisdom. I saved a lot but not everything. Here is a couple of threadshots.
I hope someone here have it all.
In a search of wisdom while rotting in rut.
I hope someone here have it all.
In a search of wisdom while rotting in rut.
File: 1641559292449-0.png (321.69 KB, 1305x1664, 1305:1664, perception2.png) ImgOps iqdb
Aaand a second one.
I remember this thread… Isn't this what so many traditions and philosophies were telling us though?
I mean like vedanta, sufism, mahayana and even christian mystics… Mainly that that reality is an illusion and stuff, you were already free and happy all along, etc
I mean like vedanta, sufism, mahayana and even christian mystics… Mainly that that reality is an illusion and stuff, you were already free and happy all along, etc
File: 1641578753460.png (45.47 KB, 891x1075, 891:1075, perception.png) ImgOps iqdb
Oh hey, that's me and my brainfarts. Kind of you to call them "wisdom" but it's just me rambling about my own ideas and failing miserably to express myself and failing to offer any kind of practical solution.
I just tried to write something more clear but ended up rambling again. Here's an interesting article that I found recently that actually demonstrates practically what "changing your perception" actually means and how change on that level leads to effortless behavioral change.
Basically, this describes how you can change overeating habits by changing your perception. The guy realized that, with a little self-observation, what made eating so compelling, was the way he perceived food as rewarding. Any time a food-related perceptual cue came up, he would be automatically thrown into a perceptual frame that made it compelling to eat, usually experienced as images and sensations of food, together with a sense of anticipation for the pleasure that he would receive from it. This is what people refer to as "cravings" or "urges" and the way people deal with them is either by accepting them and indulging in them, actively fighting them or trying to distract themselves from it.
The technique he describes here is very similar to what I was talking about. "Intuitively trying to change the frame" but the way he describes it is much better and more common sense, and without all the baggage of my crackpot theory.
https://irp-cdn.multiscreensite.com/891f98f6/files/uploaded/Jager-5-1.pdf
I've actually tried this technique when it came to my own food urges and it worked. Something about my experience of food is no longer the same. I no longer have those daydreams about food and overeating just isn't compelling anymore. At some point my stomach just feels full and I'm satiated and it's no longer rewarding. Makes it really easy to lose weight because you just eat normally, probably for the first time in your life if you're used to stuffing your face.
I just tried to write something more clear but ended up rambling again. Here's an interesting article that I found recently that actually demonstrates practically what "changing your perception" actually means and how change on that level leads to effortless behavioral change.
Basically, this describes how you can change overeating habits by changing your perception. The guy realized that, with a little self-observation, what made eating so compelling, was the way he perceived food as rewarding. Any time a food-related perceptual cue came up, he would be automatically thrown into a perceptual frame that made it compelling to eat, usually experienced as images and sensations of food, together with a sense of anticipation for the pleasure that he would receive from it. This is what people refer to as "cravings" or "urges" and the way people deal with them is either by accepting them and indulging in them, actively fighting them or trying to distract themselves from it.
The technique he describes here is very similar to what I was talking about. "Intuitively trying to change the frame" but the way he describes it is much better and more common sense, and without all the baggage of my crackpot theory.
https://irp-cdn.multiscreensite.com/891f98f6/files/uploaded/Jager-5-1.pdf
I've actually tried this technique when it came to my own food urges and it worked. Something about my experience of food is no longer the same. I no longer have those daydreams about food and overeating just isn't compelling anymore. At some point my stomach just feels full and I'm satiated and it's no longer rewarding. Makes it really easy to lose weight because you just eat normally, probably for the first time in your life if you're used to stuffing your face.
>>186988
>just overwrite your entire lifetime of learning that food is tasty with a simple visualization practice
I really wish things were that simple, but I seriously doubt you can overwrite your subconscious response like that without some serious trauma related to eating.
At best, the exercise teaches you to become more mindful once you get cravings which can be useful by itself.
>just overwrite your entire lifetime of learning that food is tasty with a simple visualization practice
I really wish things were that simple, but I seriously doubt you can overwrite your subconscious response like that without some serious trauma related to eating.
At best, the exercise teaches you to become more mindful once you get cravings which can be useful by itself.
>>186988
Have you any thoughts on "I really don't want anything" issue?
I have felt like that for ages. And I still do.
It's like besides some physiological needs I have no desires.
Have you any thoughts on "I really don't want anything" issue?
I have felt like that for ages. And I still do.
It's like besides some physiological needs I have no desires.
>>186994
It's OK to doubt it. You should always verify techniques by experimenting on yourself. Sometimes people placebo themselves or they misattribute where the change came from. The beauty of this particular article is that it doesn't attach a lot of bullshit to it, no theoretical baggage, it's just "this is what i did in my head" and it worked for some reason. That's also why it might be less convincing since it seems like magic.
The unfortunate thing about psychotherapy and trying to change habits is that we're used to the idea that it should take a long time and a lot of repetition until your mind finally gets it. The only reason why this is true in general is because the tools people use are ineffective and since everything is ineffective, slowness and frustration is expected.
There's only one psychotherapeutic modality (that I know of) that aims at this kind of swift change, a sudden radical shift in the way people see or experience things, called Coherence therapy. On the one hand, in terms of mechanics, it's very simple and straight-forward, on the other hand, the authors insist on attaching a lot of theoretical baggage to it. In my own correspondence with one of the authors, I had called their conceptualization of "emotional truth" something that obfuscates the real mechanism of change and something that added incredible complexity for the sake of seeming "deep" (the therapy was previously called Depth-Oriented Brief Therapy, so you can guess what they were aiming for). The author took quite a bit of offense to that and replied with some moralizing about devaluing people's emotional truths. I called it "fluff" precisely because it was something to be cut out and cleared out before the real truth and essence were to be found.
Anyway, I don't want to go into what Coherence Therapy is and it's particular brand of theoretical mumbo-jumbo, here's a video that goes through a case example of overeating, where the change also happens swiftly, with a radical shift in how the person experiences food. Once you strip out all the fluff that's added to explain the change, at the heart was just a perceptual shift from "food is rewarding" to "food is neutral".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fIYK6taIek8
Try to find how this case example is similar to the article you just read. If you ignore the "explanation" given by the therapist, what is the essential thing that the client did in their head that resulted in change? It was a perceptual shift. CT might be better than most therapies in getting that to happen, but unfortunately it's still getting slowed down by unnecessary crap under the fear of "devaluing the client's emotional truth". If you just aim directly for a perceptual shift, I can guarantee you'll get there faster then by just talking about your feelings or "trauma" or tripping up on theoretical conceptualization that seem neat but really only obfuscate the real thing.
After that, you can read up on some more case examples of similar perceptual shifts. Whenever you read case examples, especially ones written by the authors of the therapy they are trying to sell, always read critically and think "what's actually going on here?", don't just take the author's word for it. Ecker et al. seem to find these "emotional truth" explanations very compelling, but as you'll probably realize, they seldom make any real sense and the client just blurts out something and attaches himself to it. It's completely unnecessary in my opinion.
https://www.coherencetherapy.org/discover/examples.htm
This is just to show you that radical perceptual shifts are not only possible, but they should be instant, if they happen. Things should immediately feel different, rather than being this gradual process that is a hallmark of ineffective approaches (unfortunately, all the evidence based psychotherapeutic modalities are like that, which is why they all have the exact same efficacy (Dodo bird verdict), but I digress).
It's OK to doubt it. You should always verify techniques by experimenting on yourself. Sometimes people placebo themselves or they misattribute where the change came from. The beauty of this particular article is that it doesn't attach a lot of bullshit to it, no theoretical baggage, it's just "this is what i did in my head" and it worked for some reason. That's also why it might be less convincing since it seems like magic.
The unfortunate thing about psychotherapy and trying to change habits is that we're used to the idea that it should take a long time and a lot of repetition until your mind finally gets it. The only reason why this is true in general is because the tools people use are ineffective and since everything is ineffective, slowness and frustration is expected.
There's only one psychotherapeutic modality (that I know of) that aims at this kind of swift change, a sudden radical shift in the way people see or experience things, called Coherence therapy. On the one hand, in terms of mechanics, it's very simple and straight-forward, on the other hand, the authors insist on attaching a lot of theoretical baggage to it. In my own correspondence with one of the authors, I had called their conceptualization of "emotional truth" something that obfuscates the real mechanism of change and something that added incredible complexity for the sake of seeming "deep" (the therapy was previously called Depth-Oriented Brief Therapy, so you can guess what they were aiming for). The author took quite a bit of offense to that and replied with some moralizing about devaluing people's emotional truths. I called it "fluff" precisely because it was something to be cut out and cleared out before the real truth and essence were to be found.
Anyway, I don't want to go into what Coherence Therapy is and it's particular brand of theoretical mumbo-jumbo, here's a video that goes through a case example of overeating, where the change also happens swiftly, with a radical shift in how the person experiences food. Once you strip out all the fluff that's added to explain the change, at the heart was just a perceptual shift from "food is rewarding" to "food is neutral".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fIYK6taIek8
Try to find how this case example is similar to the article you just read. If you ignore the "explanation" given by the therapist, what is the essential thing that the client did in their head that resulted in change? It was a perceptual shift. CT might be better than most therapies in getting that to happen, but unfortunately it's still getting slowed down by unnecessary crap under the fear of "devaluing the client's emotional truth". If you just aim directly for a perceptual shift, I can guarantee you'll get there faster then by just talking about your feelings or "trauma" or tripping up on theoretical conceptualization that seem neat but really only obfuscate the real thing.
After that, you can read up on some more case examples of similar perceptual shifts. Whenever you read case examples, especially ones written by the authors of the therapy they are trying to sell, always read critically and think "what's actually going on here?", don't just take the author's word for it. Ecker et al. seem to find these "emotional truth" explanations very compelling, but as you'll probably realize, they seldom make any real sense and the client just blurts out something and attaches himself to it. It's completely unnecessary in my opinion.
https://www.coherencetherapy.org/discover/examples.htm
This is just to show you that radical perceptual shifts are not only possible, but they should be instant, if they happen. Things should immediately feel different, rather than being this gradual process that is a hallmark of ineffective approaches (unfortunately, all the evidence based psychotherapeutic modalities are like that, which is why they all have the exact same efficacy (Dodo bird verdict), but I digress).
>>186995
Perceptual frames can make certain behavior compelling or aversive. A psychological state of "I really don't want anything" is one where the person's perceptual gestalt, his current experience of the present moment, only compels demotivation and/or detachment. Phenomenologically, this could be described as not seeing any potential in anything, dismissing any and all opportunities because you don't see the point etc. In Gibson's terms, it's not perceiving any affordances in the environment, making inaction the only logical choice.
A person's perceptual gestalt is built from his habitual frames, learned and taken up through previous experience. Someone disappoints you or more horribly, betrays you in a very painful way. In order to deal with that pain, you might take up a frame where you can detach yourself from social interaction, bonds are no longer worth anything and you see no reason to be anything but alone. This helps you deal with the pain because in that frame, betrayal is not only meaningless but also expected. Of course, the short-term gain in emotional stability leads to a life where you no longer perceive any potential in human relationships. After a couple years, you just assume that this is what life is, because the perceptual shift you took up out of necessity is now habitual and stable, part of your present perceptual gestalt, the way it always was.
This is just an example of how perceptual shifts can be implicitly learned. Sometimes accidentally, sometimes compelled by necessity. I've found that people that deal with emotional pain internally, inevitably find themselves in perceptual frames that de-value a part of reality. Someone that continually fails, with no other way to deal with it, simply takes up a frame in which his endeavors are no longer worthwhile anyway. After you de-value everything, you are left in a bland, empty dessert, where no path is inviting. Perhaps you don't even remember a time when it was different.
Those situations are a bit more tricky because you can flip a particular frame, start to see potential in a certain part of reality and bring back some value, but then whatever you were trying to escape from initially is now back as well and requires you to deal with it in a different way, rather than come back to the old frame where you were comfortable but empty.
The complexity comes from needing to transform more than one frame and having enough patience to introspect and understand yourself. A common scenario is someone with a wizardly personality, flipping his perceptual frame on human relationships and starting to see the potential rewards in having friends or romantic relationships, getting excited about the prospect, only to get hurt emotionally by rejection or embarrassment or bullies and then re-treating back into his wizardly frame yet again, or if he's unlucky, not knowing how to come back and ending up having to deal with all that emotional pain. You can see how in that scenario, further work is required in order to find stability or to be able to develop enough in order to reap the rewards of the potential you see.
Funny enough, I spent an entire post ranting about Ecker and then start thinking how frames, especially negative ones that cause the person suffering, are in fact useful to the person in some way. The nihilistic point of view, while admittedly empty and meaningless, has the benefit of emotional stability, a convenient excuse to avoid responsibilities or painful emotions in general. Habitual frames can flip instantly, yet even when the person manages to do that, he quickly retreats back into a supposedly undesirable reality. Perhaps "wanting to do things" is not as great as you believe it is, potential carries with it it's own set of problems, you might have to start thinking about how to get from where you are to where you want to be and that might uncomfortable, anxiety-inducing, etc.
Perceptual frames can make certain behavior compelling or aversive. A psychological state of "I really don't want anything" is one where the person's perceptual gestalt, his current experience of the present moment, only compels demotivation and/or detachment. Phenomenologically, this could be described as not seeing any potential in anything, dismissing any and all opportunities because you don't see the point etc. In Gibson's terms, it's not perceiving any affordances in the environment, making inaction the only logical choice.
A person's perceptual gestalt is built from his habitual frames, learned and taken up through previous experience. Someone disappoints you or more horribly, betrays you in a very painful way. In order to deal with that pain, you might take up a frame where you can detach yourself from social interaction, bonds are no longer worth anything and you see no reason to be anything but alone. This helps you deal with the pain because in that frame, betrayal is not only meaningless but also expected. Of course, the short-term gain in emotional stability leads to a life where you no longer perceive any potential in human relationships. After a couple years, you just assume that this is what life is, because the perceptual shift you took up out of necessity is now habitual and stable, part of your present perceptual gestalt, the way it always was.
This is just an example of how perceptual shifts can be implicitly learned. Sometimes accidentally, sometimes compelled by necessity. I've found that people that deal with emotional pain internally, inevitably find themselves in perceptual frames that de-value a part of reality. Someone that continually fails, with no other way to deal with it, simply takes up a frame in which his endeavors are no longer worthwhile anyway. After you de-value everything, you are left in a bland, empty dessert, where no path is inviting. Perhaps you don't even remember a time when it was different.
Those situations are a bit more tricky because you can flip a particular frame, start to see potential in a certain part of reality and bring back some value, but then whatever you were trying to escape from initially is now back as well and requires you to deal with it in a different way, rather than come back to the old frame where you were comfortable but empty.
The complexity comes from needing to transform more than one frame and having enough patience to introspect and understand yourself. A common scenario is someone with a wizardly personality, flipping his perceptual frame on human relationships and starting to see the potential rewards in having friends or romantic relationships, getting excited about the prospect, only to get hurt emotionally by rejection or embarrassment or bullies and then re-treating back into his wizardly frame yet again, or if he's unlucky, not knowing how to come back and ending up having to deal with all that emotional pain. You can see how in that scenario, further work is required in order to find stability or to be able to develop enough in order to reap the rewards of the potential you see.
Funny enough, I spent an entire post ranting about Ecker and then start thinking how frames, especially negative ones that cause the person suffering, are in fact useful to the person in some way. The nihilistic point of view, while admittedly empty and meaningless, has the benefit of emotional stability, a convenient excuse to avoid responsibilities or painful emotions in general. Habitual frames can flip instantly, yet even when the person manages to do that, he quickly retreats back into a supposedly undesirable reality. Perhaps "wanting to do things" is not as great as you believe it is, potential carries with it it's own set of problems, you might have to start thinking about how to get from where you are to where you want to be and that might uncomfortable, anxiety-inducing, etc.
>>186988
>>187027
>>187026
I have a statement to offer to you. For a very long time, I have held back from revealing such statements to the general public at large, and still, I will yet still curtail a vista of general information, if not simply yet to make this statement, for your consideration.
…Nothing in this world works the way you/we think it does. Systems do not work the way we think they do. Ideologies are constructed upon flimsy, usually dualistic notions of generally cooked up notions of narrative functions…
History does not work the way we think it does. Time and Space do not work the way we think they do. The Mind or the "Concious Ego/Personality Shell" is actually a pittance compared to the true absolute nature of the "Self" which is, "All That Is"
All of your life, you are inundated and interacted upon by forces beyond your complete comprehension. Subconscious processes, The Shadow, The Anima/Animus, The Wise Old Man/succubus, of both the Personal and the Collective
The entire nature of Ones' personality, coming to recognition with their own living ignorance, is astounding
For many years, I have been an ardent, uncompromising truth seeker. I have seen things that many people will never believe and accept. I have become witness to forces, energies, truths, which in all seriousness, will become more and more recognized, and will carry relevance, millions of years into the future, this is said without desire for personal recognition, merely, recognition for the awesomeness of that sublime quintessence which is, "The Truth"…
…I have developed abilities, powers, capacities from observation of "Truth"
There is an ocean of unconscious phenomena which, essentially, due to its' veiled nature, directs and guides the flow of Ones' own life, perhaps being perpetually out of Ones' own reach, for the entirety of Ones' own life
…
…What do you have to say, about the alteration of Ones' own personality, coming from the distorted perception of The Personality Shell/Ego, towards the greater whole of reality/absolute unified self?
Humanity, possesses abilities. People have sought to kill others, ie The Salem Witch Trials, solely for the perception of the concept of humans possessing "spiritual abilities" to affect the fabric of reality, whether that be as an affect unto Ones' personal reality, or as something akin to the perception of "Witchcraft" which is, generally, an particular superstitious religious framework interpretation of natural abilities/capacities that a human has, which operates outside of the "good/evil" framework as dictated by the relative cultural framework interpretation, at the time
Tl;dr… The life of the individual is guided along/influenced by subconscious and unconscious energetic processes. What is the nature or the necessity of continuity of ignorance of these processes, and what is/are the consequences of "Bringing The Truth To Light" or "Illuminating The Darkness" as far performing "alterations" unto Ones' own mental processes? How far can this really go, attempting to "control" a much larger and perceptive part of Ones' Self, when One is operating from a framework of being guided along, by these very same forces, from a position of darkness/ignorance towards the nature of the Truth of Self, as far as an archetypal religious concernred?
Religious figures, perhaps a near universal maxim, profess an archetype which is much akin to what these posts are professing, "Look within, discover what is within, transform what is within"… Consider religious movements which contain a references to "Illumination"… Jesus Christ, Lucifer,Ahura Mazda, All Solar Deities… Consider that the Buddha teaches One to become "Enlightened" and hence, the "Knowledge Of The Truth" is the "Light" which "Illuminates/Enlightens" one from a state of "Ignorance/Darkness" towards Ones' True Nature
Peace and Blessings unto all who read, enjoy the rest of your day/night/life
>>187027
>>187026
I have a statement to offer to you. For a very long time, I have held back from revealing such statements to the general public at large, and still, I will yet still curtail a vista of general information, if not simply yet to make this statement, for your consideration.
…Nothing in this world works the way you/we think it does. Systems do not work the way we think they do. Ideologies are constructed upon flimsy, usually dualistic notions of generally cooked up notions of narrative functions…
History does not work the way we think it does. Time and Space do not work the way we think they do. The Mind or the "Concious Ego/Personality Shell" is actually a pittance compared to the true absolute nature of the "Self" which is, "All That Is"
All of your life, you are inundated and interacted upon by forces beyond your complete comprehension. Subconscious processes, The Shadow, The Anima/Animus, The Wise Old Man/succubus, of both the Personal and the Collective
The entire nature of Ones' personality, coming to recognition with their own living ignorance, is astounding
For many years, I have been an ardent, uncompromising truth seeker. I have seen things that many people will never believe and accept. I have become witness to forces, energies, truths, which in all seriousness, will become more and more recognized, and will carry relevance, millions of years into the future, this is said without desire for personal recognition, merely, recognition for the awesomeness of that sublime quintessence which is, "The Truth"…
…I have developed abilities, powers, capacities from observation of "Truth"
There is an ocean of unconscious phenomena which, essentially, due to its' veiled nature, directs and guides the flow of Ones' own life, perhaps being perpetually out of Ones' own reach, for the entirety of Ones' own life
…
…What do you have to say, about the alteration of Ones' own personality, coming from the distorted perception of The Personality Shell/Ego, towards the greater whole of reality/absolute unified self?
Humanity, possesses abilities. People have sought to kill others, ie The Salem Witch Trials, solely for the perception of the concept of humans possessing "spiritual abilities" to affect the fabric of reality, whether that be as an affect unto Ones' personal reality, or as something akin to the perception of "Witchcraft" which is, generally, an particular superstitious religious framework interpretation of natural abilities/capacities that a human has, which operates outside of the "good/evil" framework as dictated by the relative cultural framework interpretation, at the time
Tl;dr… The life of the individual is guided along/influenced by subconscious and unconscious energetic processes. What is the nature or the necessity of continuity of ignorance of these processes, and what is/are the consequences of "Bringing The Truth To Light" or "Illuminating The Darkness" as far performing "alterations" unto Ones' own mental processes? How far can this really go, attempting to "control" a much larger and perceptive part of Ones' Self, when One is operating from a framework of being guided along, by these very same forces, from a position of darkness/ignorance towards the nature of the Truth of Self, as far as an archetypal religious concernred?
Religious figures, perhaps a near universal maxim, profess an archetype which is much akin to what these posts are professing, "Look within, discover what is within, transform what is within"… Consider religious movements which contain a references to "Illumination"… Jesus Christ, Lucifer,Ahura Mazda, All Solar Deities… Consider that the Buddha teaches One to become "Enlightened" and hence, the "Knowledge Of The Truth" is the "Light" which "Illuminates/Enlightens" one from a state of "Ignorance/Darkness" towards Ones' True Nature
Peace and Blessings unto all who read, enjoy the rest of your day/night/life
>>187058
This reminds me of a thought I had: if you think of something, a branch of reality will be created and since karma is your making, you can take action towards that branch of reality to merge it into this reality. If the abstract tree of actions takes a shape that is in line with the laws of this reality and is in line with what can be done within the boundaries of this world and yours, it can materialize or manifest over time. If your actions keep reflecting it and you don't lose your way by someone else's will or idea, it becomes the memory of your body. At some point you act it out subconsciously and you have achieved a transformation of the "self". Reality, the world and it's interpretation starts existing right in your head through your sensors after all.
Since you are just a tiny actor inside a large system, you have centralization, society, social hierarchies, algorithms and other entities that push you back into your little box, because your thoughts are too dangerous and could affect the reality someone else is creating at the moment. It is then, where you are not in control of the input to your true "self" and you start acting predictable within someone's frame of reality. Just like one large hivemind operating on the deepest layer that connects it all, making sure to filter the input, so it's output remains deterministic, curated and pre-calculated.
"In the animal kingdom, the rule is, eat or be eaten; in the human kingdom, define or be defined." -psychiatrist Thomas Szasz
This reminds me of a thought I had: if you think of something, a branch of reality will be created and since karma is your making, you can take action towards that branch of reality to merge it into this reality. If the abstract tree of actions takes a shape that is in line with the laws of this reality and is in line with what can be done within the boundaries of this world and yours, it can materialize or manifest over time. If your actions keep reflecting it and you don't lose your way by someone else's will or idea, it becomes the memory of your body. At some point you act it out subconsciously and you have achieved a transformation of the "self". Reality, the world and it's interpretation starts existing right in your head through your sensors after all.
Since you are just a tiny actor inside a large system, you have centralization, society, social hierarchies, algorithms and other entities that push you back into your little box, because your thoughts are too dangerous and could affect the reality someone else is creating at the moment. It is then, where you are not in control of the input to your true "self" and you start acting predictable within someone's frame of reality. Just like one large hivemind operating on the deepest layer that connects it all, making sure to filter the input, so it's output remains deterministic, curated and pre-calculated.
"In the animal kingdom, the rule is, eat or be eaten; in the human kingdom, define or be defined." -psychiatrist Thomas Szasz
File: 1642268831509.jpg (85.58 KB, 768x613, 768:613, 36thChamberOfShaolin-768x6….jpg) ImgOps iqdb
>>186988
Something that's peripherally related to what your talking about; I've found that I can make myself do things more easily if I perceive them as being agreeable to my own personal disposition. So I might not feel like working out for example, but if I imagine myself, or think of myself, as being a Shaolin monk or something all of the sudden I might actually want to do it (as retarded as that may sound).
But it only works if the activity coincides with my preconceived agreeable image -so this wouldn't inspire me to start benchpressing because that's not something Shaolin monks do, but I'll feel very inspired to start doing calisthenics.
I've even had periods where I imagine myself as simply being a self-controlled person (like a Batman type character) and this has a cascading effect onto everything, whereby I can make myself do anything at all. I can workout several times a day, I can read for hours at a time, I can easily refuse food and diet, etc. -and all of this become completely effortless.
The biggest problem with this is that the effects don't seem to be permanent, and I cannot consistently get this process to work. It's not verbal, or a matter of just visualizing. For this to work I have to convince myself on a very base conceptual level, which I can't necessarily consciously control.
Something that's peripherally related to what your talking about; I've found that I can make myself do things more easily if I perceive them as being agreeable to my own personal disposition. So I might not feel like working out for example, but if I imagine myself, or think of myself, as being a Shaolin monk or something all of the sudden I might actually want to do it (as retarded as that may sound).
But it only works if the activity coincides with my preconceived agreeable image -so this wouldn't inspire me to start benchpressing because that's not something Shaolin monks do, but I'll feel very inspired to start doing calisthenics.
I've even had periods where I imagine myself as simply being a self-controlled person (like a Batman type character) and this has a cascading effect onto everything, whereby I can make myself do anything at all. I can workout several times a day, I can read for hours at a time, I can easily refuse food and diet, etc. -and all of this become completely effortless.
The biggest problem with this is that the effects don't seem to be permanent, and I cannot consistently get this process to work. It's not verbal, or a matter of just visualizing. For this to work I have to convince myself on a very base conceptual level, which I can't necessarily consciously control.
File: 1642270035802.jpg (29.57 KB, 468x321, 156:107, chimpAP0512_468x321.jpg) ImgOps iqdb
>>187197
He's better than us
He's better than us
>>187279
The more you observe yourself like this, the more you'll notice how your perception influences your motivation by making things seem appealing or the opposite. The perceptual frame itself is actually this "preconceived agreeable image" that you've observed that you have and you've noticed that aligning your current activities with that image makes them seem more appealing. Being conscious and aware of this will help you take advantage and help direct yourself more easily, but it's still something that operates inside of the frame, rather than changing it.
A perceptual shift is when that "preconceived agreeable image" shifts into something different and this can cause radical changes to your behavior. The way this is experienced is that old behavior will simply stop making sense to you, so you stop doing it, or new behavior suddenly becomes very natural and effortless. These shifts are possible, but I can't say what exactly causes it. Visualizations and mental imagery don't necessarily, otherwise you'd be having shifts any time a thought popped into your head which would be horrific in its own way (think of people with extreme "mood swings").
Visualizations and mental imagery are tools that can definitely cause a shift, but it's important what you imagine and visualize and it's important in very subtle ways that aren't very clear to me currently. From Bruce Ecker's work, you can force a shift to happen if you guide a person to experience two incompatible realities side by side and it will have to settle on one. For instance, a person might have this very rigid and unchangeable view of reality where people are dangerous no matter what and within that frame, anxiety and anxious behavior are compelling. If you can get the person to experience people as safe or call up a vivid memory of such an experience, then use a visualization technique where those two contradictory realities are set side by side, it's highly likely to cause a permanent shift. I guess perceptual frames have to make sense and be useful to the person, and a contradictory experience will likely dissolve even the most deeply held frames.
This could be generalized and simplified: perceptual frames have "features" or "expectations" that can be contradicted and violated experientially in order to cause them to dissolve or rapidly re-organize into something else.
Then it becomes somewhat more clear what happens when you utilize the technique from the article about overeating. First, he visualizes food in order to activate the frame and have it mind, he feels the urge to eat, then he contradicts the main "feature" i.e. food is no longer rewarding. He describes it as "moving away" until the food no longer feels enticing. A couple repetitions of this is enough to permanently remove the urge or significantly decrease it.
After I read his article, I had no problem replicating the result, probably due to extensive experience with my own mental playground and conjuring up experiences (intense daydreaming), but other people's mileage may vary. Like I said, it's subtle. It's not a visualization, only the initial movement is mental imagery i.e. an image, smell, taste of something enticing like a juicy burger, this is used to trigger the frame. The thing that dissolves it is contradicting the main expectation i.e. the food is rewarding and will make me feel good, not through rationalization or telling yourself verbally "it won't feel good" but actually conjuring an experience where it doesn't. You could imagine the burger tasting disgusting, but then, you might just develop an aversion or sick feeling around burgers (people that get food poisoning from certain food sometimes develop this). Or the frame might just account for this and have a small expectation that the food will taste bad, but not enough to make you stop eating. The best way to dissolve the urge is to violate the expectation that the food will be rewarding DESPITE it tasting good. Interestingly, food can taste good but not feel enticing, something I discovered in the aftermath, a lot "this burger is delicious, but i already feel full and satiated". So the sense of reward isn't necessarily tied to the taste. A lot of people assume that they are addicted to food because it just tastes too good, but everyone else has the same taste buds and doesn't overeat, how come?
Anyway, you should continue doing what you are doing if it works for you, keep observing what happens internally, sketching out the edges of the frame, this "preconceived agreeable image", and observe how it influences your behavior. Try experimenting with various visualization techniques, what kind of images, sensations, thoughts etc. activate it (something about seeing yourself as a shaolin monk fits a pattern or expectation). This sounds like a useful frame, if it makes you exercise, just learn what kind of pattern activates it, if you find something more general, you'll more easily take advantage of it.
The more you observe yourself like this, the more you'll notice how your perception influences your motivation by making things seem appealing or the opposite. The perceptual frame itself is actually this "preconceived agreeable image" that you've observed that you have and you've noticed that aligning your current activities with that image makes them seem more appealing. Being conscious and aware of this will help you take advantage and help direct yourself more easily, but it's still something that operates inside of the frame, rather than changing it.
A perceptual shift is when that "preconceived agreeable image" shifts into something different and this can cause radical changes to your behavior. The way this is experienced is that old behavior will simply stop making sense to you, so you stop doing it, or new behavior suddenly becomes very natural and effortless. These shifts are possible, but I can't say what exactly causes it. Visualizations and mental imagery don't necessarily, otherwise you'd be having shifts any time a thought popped into your head which would be horrific in its own way (think of people with extreme "mood swings").
Visualizations and mental imagery are tools that can definitely cause a shift, but it's important what you imagine and visualize and it's important in very subtle ways that aren't very clear to me currently. From Bruce Ecker's work, you can force a shift to happen if you guide a person to experience two incompatible realities side by side and it will have to settle on one. For instance, a person might have this very rigid and unchangeable view of reality where people are dangerous no matter what and within that frame, anxiety and anxious behavior are compelling. If you can get the person to experience people as safe or call up a vivid memory of such an experience, then use a visualization technique where those two contradictory realities are set side by side, it's highly likely to cause a permanent shift. I guess perceptual frames have to make sense and be useful to the person, and a contradictory experience will likely dissolve even the most deeply held frames.
This could be generalized and simplified: perceptual frames have "features" or "expectations" that can be contradicted and violated experientially in order to cause them to dissolve or rapidly re-organize into something else.
Then it becomes somewhat more clear what happens when you utilize the technique from the article about overeating. First, he visualizes food in order to activate the frame and have it mind, he feels the urge to eat, then he contradicts the main "feature" i.e. food is no longer rewarding. He describes it as "moving away" until the food no longer feels enticing. A couple repetitions of this is enough to permanently remove the urge or significantly decrease it.
After I read his article, I had no problem replicating the result, probably due to extensive experience with my own mental playground and conjuring up experiences (intense daydreaming), but other people's mileage may vary. Like I said, it's subtle. It's not a visualization, only the initial movement is mental imagery i.e. an image, smell, taste of something enticing like a juicy burger, this is used to trigger the frame. The thing that dissolves it is contradicting the main expectation i.e. the food is rewarding and will make me feel good, not through rationalization or telling yourself verbally "it won't feel good" but actually conjuring an experience where it doesn't. You could imagine the burger tasting disgusting, but then, you might just develop an aversion or sick feeling around burgers (people that get food poisoning from certain food sometimes develop this). Or the frame might just account for this and have a small expectation that the food will taste bad, but not enough to make you stop eating. The best way to dissolve the urge is to violate the expectation that the food will be rewarding DESPITE it tasting good. Interestingly, food can taste good but not feel enticing, something I discovered in the aftermath, a lot "this burger is delicious, but i already feel full and satiated". So the sense of reward isn't necessarily tied to the taste. A lot of people assume that they are addicted to food because it just tastes too good, but everyone else has the same taste buds and doesn't overeat, how come?
Anyway, you should continue doing what you are doing if it works for you, keep observing what happens internally, sketching out the edges of the frame, this "preconceived agreeable image", and observe how it influences your behavior. Try experimenting with various visualization techniques, what kind of images, sensations, thoughts etc. activate it (something about seeing yourself as a shaolin monk fits a pattern or expectation). This sounds like a useful frame, if it makes you exercise, just learn what kind of pattern activates it, if you find something more general, you'll more easily take advantage of it.
>>187310
We're just reaching the limitations of language. All communication relies on two people being in a shared intersubjective space and language is simply used to refer to things in that space. When discussing things that happen in your head, you can never be truly sure you're referring to the same kind of phenomena.
We're just reaching the limitations of language. All communication relies on two people being in a shared intersubjective space and language is simply used to refer to things in that space. When discussing things that happen in your head, you can never be truly sure you're referring to the same kind of phenomena.
File: 1647468562887.jpg (62.84 KB, 763x432, 763:432, ninja.jpg) ImgOps iqdb
>>187279
I've been doing some experimentation and I've found a way that allows me to tap into this state a bit more consistently. Through self observation I've found that a variety of things can trigger a state of motivation inside of me. This mostly seems to happen through identification with certain fictional characters or archetypes.
For example, I might watch a samurai movie and all of the sudden identify with the 'lone, wandering swordsman' archetype. The idea of a skilled, self possessed/determined that is superior through physical and mental ability he honed through training instantly appeals to me and I immediately want to pursue activities that will bring me inline with this archetype.
Or I might be playing a video game and identify with the character. I just remembered this, but when I was younger I played a game called Crackdown, where you upgrade your character's abilities by collecting orbs, which would allow you to jump higher, do more damage, etc. and you would even see your character model physically change; this inspired me tremendously and for a couple weeks after that I started working out. But I've observed this more recently as well after playing a game called Kenshi (another game focused on improving your abilities, but it also has a samurai/lone drifter theme for a double whammy of inspiration). I've even been inspired by those sigma male memes on YouTube, as stupid as that sounds.
I think that this identification with an appealing personal aesthetic triggers this sense of motivation by (temporarily) altering your self image. For a moment you aspire to be that character that inspired you so much, and activities like physical exercise become appealing as opposed to repulsive because the association with the activity becomes pleasant.
Working out in a commercial gym because you read about the health benefits of lifting in a men's health magazine = lame, boring tedious. Doing pull ups in your room while pretending you're training to be a ninja assassin after playing too many video games = cool, exciting, fulfilling (at least in my mind).
I don't think this phenomenon is at all uncommon, how many young guys pretended to be Tyler Durden for two weeks after watching Fight Club? But the problem is that the motivation that arises doesn't last too long and fades away, after which you return to your previous behaviors. Surely there's a way to tap into this phenomenon more consistently for your own good?
Well that's where this comes in: I happened to read a book called Pyscho-Cybernetics by Maxwell Maltz, which talks about the all importance of self-image. It's a pretty popular book, perhaps one of the most popular self help books of all time, so I won't go into detail about it. However, the main conceit of the book is that your self-image can be changed through visualization. Then what the author calls a 'servo-mechanism' (basically your subconscious mind) will effortlessly take over, and guide you towards realizing your new found self-image.
I figured, why not combine the principles from Pyscho-Cybernetics with my own little discovery, so I started doing this:
first I will conjure up in my imagination a character that I find appealing, someone or even something that agrees with my personal 'taste' if you will. This 'feeling' around the character is important. It's not just about 'being a ninja assassin/wizard/sigma male' it's about honing your physical body and mental faculties/abilities and the context in which it happens. Maybe an Olympic athlete can also be said to be training his 'physical and mental abilities' but I think the Olympics are lame, but being a ninja is cool, so I have to use the image of a ninja.
So, I will imagine this character which summons the appropriate feelings of 'agreeableness', which will almost entice me towards certain activities in and of itself.
Then on top of that I will imagine myself doing these activities (e.g. working out) as that character (as per Pyscho-Cybernetics).
This so far seems like a promising method, and I have had some success with it -primarily with physical exercise, but also with some creative endeavors like drawing (but this post is already too long, so I won't elaborate on that process).
I will continue to explore it further, and see to what extent I can use it to enact personal change, in a way that's actually somewhat pleasant and automatic (sorry for the autistic rant, and excuse any grammer mistakes).
I've been doing some experimentation and I've found a way that allows me to tap into this state a bit more consistently. Through self observation I've found that a variety of things can trigger a state of motivation inside of me. This mostly seems to happen through identification with certain fictional characters or archetypes.
For example, I might watch a samurai movie and all of the sudden identify with the 'lone, wandering swordsman' archetype. The idea of a skilled, self possessed/determined that is superior through physical and mental ability he honed through training instantly appeals to me and I immediately want to pursue activities that will bring me inline with this archetype.
Or I might be playing a video game and identify with the character. I just remembered this, but when I was younger I played a game called Crackdown, where you upgrade your character's abilities by collecting orbs, which would allow you to jump higher, do more damage, etc. and you would even see your character model physically change; this inspired me tremendously and for a couple weeks after that I started working out. But I've observed this more recently as well after playing a game called Kenshi (another game focused on improving your abilities, but it also has a samurai/lone drifter theme for a double whammy of inspiration). I've even been inspired by those sigma male memes on YouTube, as stupid as that sounds.
I think that this identification with an appealing personal aesthetic triggers this sense of motivation by (temporarily) altering your self image. For a moment you aspire to be that character that inspired you so much, and activities like physical exercise become appealing as opposed to repulsive because the association with the activity becomes pleasant.
Working out in a commercial gym because you read about the health benefits of lifting in a men's health magazine = lame, boring tedious. Doing pull ups in your room while pretending you're training to be a ninja assassin after playing too many video games = cool, exciting, fulfilling (at least in my mind).
I don't think this phenomenon is at all uncommon, how many young guys pretended to be Tyler Durden for two weeks after watching Fight Club? But the problem is that the motivation that arises doesn't last too long and fades away, after which you return to your previous behaviors. Surely there's a way to tap into this phenomenon more consistently for your own good?
Well that's where this comes in: I happened to read a book called Pyscho-Cybernetics by Maxwell Maltz, which talks about the all importance of self-image. It's a pretty popular book, perhaps one of the most popular self help books of all time, so I won't go into detail about it. However, the main conceit of the book is that your self-image can be changed through visualization. Then what the author calls a 'servo-mechanism' (basically your subconscious mind) will effortlessly take over, and guide you towards realizing your new found self-image.
I figured, why not combine the principles from Pyscho-Cybernetics with my own little discovery, so I started doing this:
first I will conjure up in my imagination a character that I find appealing, someone or even something that agrees with my personal 'taste' if you will. This 'feeling' around the character is important. It's not just about 'being a ninja assassin/wizard/sigma male' it's about honing your physical body and mental faculties/abilities and the context in which it happens. Maybe an Olympic athlete can also be said to be training his 'physical and mental abilities' but I think the Olympics are lame, but being a ninja is cool, so I have to use the image of a ninja.
So, I will imagine this character which summons the appropriate feelings of 'agreeableness', which will almost entice me towards certain activities in and of itself.
Then on top of that I will imagine myself doing these activities (e.g. working out) as that character (as per Pyscho-Cybernetics).
This so far seems like a promising method, and I have had some success with it -primarily with physical exercise, but also with some creative endeavors like drawing (but this post is already too long, so I won't elaborate on that process).
I will continue to explore it further, and see to what extent I can use it to enact personal change, in a way that's actually somewhat pleasant and automatic (sorry for the autistic rant, and excuse any grammer mistakes).
>>188997
Sounds great, keep us posted. I want to know your progress. In the meantime, I will check out that book and let you know if I find something useful myself.
Sounds great, keep us posted. I want to know your progress. In the meantime, I will check out that book and let you know if I find something useful myself.
>>188997
reminds me of the meme of patrick bateman from american psycho walking out of a movie theatre and it is titled "every guy when they walk out of a movie theatre after seeing x" and they become the main character for a while. maybe someone knows what im talking about, memes are hard to explain when they arent in front of you
reminds me of the meme of patrick bateman from american psycho walking out of a movie theatre and it is titled "every guy when they walk out of a movie theatre after seeing x" and they become the main character for a while. maybe someone knows what im talking about, memes are hard to explain when they arent in front of you
The phenomenon you guys are describing is caused by the MKULTRA operant conditioning embedded in the media. Learning to channel it in a positive direction is a useful skill and I am happy for you all and rooting for nothing but steady upward progress and success for all of you
>>189007
Please actually look up what the MKULTRA program was because it's super clear you don't know.
Please actually look up what the MKULTRA program was because it's super clear you don't know.
File: 1647680682828-0.jpg (1.78 MB, 2560x1920, 4:3, FDdwk58mZdk.jpg) ImgOps iqdb
>>188997
>also with some creative endeavors like drawing (but this post is already too long
B-but I want to hear about your efforts in drawing.
Continue please.
>also with some creative endeavors like drawing (but this post is already too long
B-but I want to hear about your efforts in drawing.
Continue please.
>>186988
It's a little off-topic, but I can't keep myself from asking.
Do you know any methods for dealing with constant negative thoughts and anxiety?
It's a little off-topic, but I can't keep myself from asking.
Do you know any methods for dealing with constant negative thoughts and anxiety?
File: 1652048550045.jpg (280.9 KB, 2480x3508, 620:877, girl.jpg) ImgOps iqdb
>>188997
It's me again, thought I would share some more thoughts having done this for the last two months. The good is that it certainly seems to be working. I've been exercising regularly, I've lost a bunch of weight, I'm much more productive, etc. I've even signed up and started taking martial arts classes, which is probably not a step I would have taken even a year ago -but I really got into the mindset of being this modern day samurai dude that regularly beats people to a pulp, plus I visualized myself actually singing up for the classes and it somehow just happened. I went and did it without to much trepidation, whereas previously I would have been much too hesitant and anxious to do something like that.
I also in general feel that I've become more confident, and have an improved self image/esteem. I don't actively imagine myself to have a good self esteem, but it seems to be a byproduct of trying to imagine/embody certain characters and archetypes.
That said, it's not magic. I've still had some bad days, where I was low energy and didn't feel like doing much. I've felt some resistance to doing certain activities sometimes. On some occasions, even if I visualize myself doing a certain activity I still might not end up doing it, because I procrastinate or forget about it. I think this is partially because I'm trying to do a lot of things at the same time, and I think it's impossible to direct an equal amount of effort into a dozen activities all at the same time.
Still, the fact that I've been on a two month streak of (almost) unbroken productivity is certainly very good and highly unusual for me. Most of the time my self development efforts last two weeks, if that.
As an addendum to the technique, another thing I've been thinking about is that there is this sort of felt-sense associated with what I like to call your 'conceptual framing' of an activity or even the world itself -you might even call it mindset- which seems to be very important in aligning your 'self image', that's basically what I was getting at in >>187279 .
This is gonna sound stupid but I was listening to Ambitionz az a Ridah by 2pac the other day and one of the lyrics goes "To be a soldier, must maintain composure at ease, Though life is complicated, only what you make it to be" and after I heard that, I felt what I can only subjectively describe as a shift in mindset, and felt a sort of 'go-getter' mood come over me. I've experienced a similar thing after watching those American Psycho sigma grindset memes, like I said. The mood went away, but it's very clear that it happened.
I've been very focused on visualization, as per Psycho-Cybernetics, but I think I will more strongly try to incorporate this 'felt-sense', conceptual framing, mindset type of thing into my practice, because I do think it's a potentially powerful component that I've sort of let fall by the way side in lieu of my focus on visualizing.
>>189067
There really isn't much to it, other than that I've been doing it. I've occupied myself with drawing for several years for now, but it's always been very on and off, and especially the last couple of years where I nearly stopped drawing completely until the last couple of months. I didn't draw for the whole year of 2020, for example, very little in 2021, etc. But now I've started doing it more consistently and with more rigor and determination. I also feel that my performance/skill has improved in a rather short period of time, coming off of a period where I really didn't put a lot of attention to art for the last couple of years I think that's pretty interesting, you wouldn't necessarily expect that to happen. That said I'm still a mediocre artist at best (pic related), so it remains to be seen if this method can really propel me to the next level in terms of skill.
(P.S. I understand these posts are quite lengthy, so you'll have to excuse the autistic rambling, but I really feel like I'm onto something here and I want to externalize it to other people, but it requires me to relate a bunch of subjective experiences that I don't even fully understand myself, so unfortunately I have to be verbose).
It's me again, thought I would share some more thoughts having done this for the last two months. The good is that it certainly seems to be working. I've been exercising regularly, I've lost a bunch of weight, I'm much more productive, etc. I've even signed up and started taking martial arts classes, which is probably not a step I would have taken even a year ago -but I really got into the mindset of being this modern day samurai dude that regularly beats people to a pulp, plus I visualized myself actually singing up for the classes and it somehow just happened. I went and did it without to much trepidation, whereas previously I would have been much too hesitant and anxious to do something like that.
I also in general feel that I've become more confident, and have an improved self image/esteem. I don't actively imagine myself to have a good self esteem, but it seems to be a byproduct of trying to imagine/embody certain characters and archetypes.
That said, it's not magic. I've still had some bad days, where I was low energy and didn't feel like doing much. I've felt some resistance to doing certain activities sometimes. On some occasions, even if I visualize myself doing a certain activity I still might not end up doing it, because I procrastinate or forget about it. I think this is partially because I'm trying to do a lot of things at the same time, and I think it's impossible to direct an equal amount of effort into a dozen activities all at the same time.
Still, the fact that I've been on a two month streak of (almost) unbroken productivity is certainly very good and highly unusual for me. Most of the time my self development efforts last two weeks, if that.
As an addendum to the technique, another thing I've been thinking about is that there is this sort of felt-sense associated with what I like to call your 'conceptual framing' of an activity or even the world itself -you might even call it mindset- which seems to be very important in aligning your 'self image', that's basically what I was getting at in >>187279 .
This is gonna sound stupid but I was listening to Ambitionz az a Ridah by 2pac the other day and one of the lyrics goes "To be a soldier, must maintain composure at ease, Though life is complicated, only what you make it to be" and after I heard that, I felt what I can only subjectively describe as a shift in mindset, and felt a sort of 'go-getter' mood come over me. I've experienced a similar thing after watching those American Psycho sigma grindset memes, like I said. The mood went away, but it's very clear that it happened.
I've been very focused on visualization, as per Psycho-Cybernetics, but I think I will more strongly try to incorporate this 'felt-sense', conceptual framing, mindset type of thing into my practice, because I do think it's a potentially powerful component that I've sort of let fall by the way side in lieu of my focus on visualizing.
>>189067
There really isn't much to it, other than that I've been doing it. I've occupied myself with drawing for several years for now, but it's always been very on and off, and especially the last couple of years where I nearly stopped drawing completely until the last couple of months. I didn't draw for the whole year of 2020, for example, very little in 2021, etc. But now I've started doing it more consistently and with more rigor and determination. I also feel that my performance/skill has improved in a rather short period of time, coming off of a period where I really didn't put a lot of attention to art for the last couple of years I think that's pretty interesting, you wouldn't necessarily expect that to happen. That said I'm still a mediocre artist at best (pic related), so it remains to be seen if this method can really propel me to the next level in terms of skill.
(P.S. I understand these posts are quite lengthy, so you'll have to excuse the autistic rambling, but I really feel like I'm onto something here and I want to externalize it to other people, but it requires me to relate a bunch of subjective experiences that I don't even fully understand myself, so unfortunately I have to be verbose).
File: 1652064049631.png (663.47 KB, 1337x6019, 1337:6019, wizardchanwisdom.png) ImgOps iqdb
Alright, let me post everything from my wizchan folder.
File: 1652064107396.png (100.82 KB, 572x384, 143:96, uncleremus1.png) ImgOps iqdb
Can I really only post one at a time?
File: 1652064142303.png (71.83 KB, 559x330, 559:330, uncleremus2.png) ImgOps iqdb
File: 1652064181910.png (104.07 KB, 559x552, 559:552, uncleremus3.png) ImgOps iqdb
>>190747
Great, and now I'm getting flood detected.
Great, and now I'm getting flood detected.
File: 1652064204756.png (98.64 KB, 557x501, 557:501, uncleremus4.png) ImgOps iqdb
File: 1652064271972.png (104.79 KB, 606x563, 606:563, uncleremus5.png) ImgOps iqdb
File: 1652064308496.png (59.41 KB, 611x303, 611:303, uncleremus6.png) ImgOps iqdb
>>190750
I can hear the English wizard poster complaining about this.
I can hear the English wizard poster complaining about this.
File: 1652064345312.png (129.17 KB, 756x584, 189:146, uncleremus7.png) ImgOps iqdb
>>190751
Alright, that's Uncle Remus out of the way, on to the main wizchan quotes.
Alright, that's Uncle Remus out of the way, on to the main wizchan quotes.
File: 1652064407435.png (269.54 KB, 1185x699, 395:233, wizchanquote1.png) ImgOps iqdb
File: 1652064457575.png (93.28 KB, 707x545, 707:545, wizchanquote2.png) ImgOps iqdb
File: 1652068770104.png (136.28 KB, 1274x370, 637:185, wizchanquote3.png) ImgOps iqdb
File: 1652068827945.png (138.35 KB, 1303x244, 1303:244, wizchanquote4.png) ImgOps iqdb
File: 1652068878345.png (188.16 KB, 728x324, 182:81, wizchanquote5.png) ImgOps iqdb
File: 1652068915748.png (51.52 KB, 1497x252, 499:84, wizchanquote6.png) ImgOps iqdb
File: 1652069046200.png (108.15 KB, 1229x371, 1229:371, wizchanquote7.png) ImgOps iqdb
File: 1652069118271.png (22.41 KB, 1284x152, 321:38, wizchanquote8.png) ImgOps iqdb
File: 1652069150747.png (62.64 KB, 1243x236, 1243:236, wizchanquote9.png) ImgOps iqdb
File: 1652069189073.jpg (261.24 KB, 1270x418, 635:209, wizchanquote10.jpg) ImgOps iqdb
File: 1652069245084.png (62.07 KB, 1262x395, 1262:395, wizchanquote11.png) ImgOps iqdb
File: 1652069377602.png (62.07 KB, 1262x395, 1262:395, wizchanquote12.png) ImgOps iqdb
File: 1652096402384.png (105.07 KB, 1266x321, 422:107, wizchanquote13.png) ImgOps iqdb
File: 1652096491641.png (8.64 KB, 1176x113, 1176:113, wizchanquote14.png) ImgOps iqdb
File: 1652096530942.png (121.87 KB, 1118x287, 1118:287, wizchanquote15.png) ImgOps iqdb
File: 1652096598560.png (7.99 KB, 742x103, 742:103, wizchanquote16.png) ImgOps iqdb
File: 1652096745864.png (17.1 KB, 1324x143, 1324:143, wizchanquote17.png) ImgOps iqdb
File: 1652096813668.jpg (102.17 KB, 585x433, 585:433, wizchanquote20.jpg) ImgOps iqdb
>>186982
This is behavioral nudging. I find it interesting he termed as perception. There has been much talk especially in recent times on how the internet (namely social media) has been behavior nudging us. This wizard traced the root cause up a level to something I've not seen spoken.
Behavior modification is a consequence of perceptual change. As he said, change perceptions and naturally behavior follows. When you think of it so much of the internet has come to be dominated with the struggle over your frame of mind of various aspects of the world.
This is behavioral nudging. I find it interesting he termed as perception. There has been much talk especially in recent times on how the internet (namely social media) has been behavior nudging us. This wizard traced the root cause up a level to something I've not seen spoken.
Behavior modification is a consequence of perceptual change. As he said, change perceptions and naturally behavior follows. When you think of it so much of the internet has come to be dominated with the struggle over your frame of mind of various aspects of the world.
File: 1652726970581.png (374.87 KB, 1866x695, 1866:695, NutSweeper.PNG) ImgOps iqdb
>>190919
What is worse. The base instinct itself or knowing I cannot overcome it. Perhaps it does not matter. The both are a double source of turmoil.
What is worse. The base instinct itself or knowing I cannot overcome it. Perhaps it does not matter. The both are a double source of turmoil.
>>190920
>or knowing I cannot overcome it
You can. Just lower your libido with hormone therapy. People usually do the opposite, for example, the contraceptive pill lowers some succubi's libido stressing the relationship with her partner, so they do hormone therapy to enhance the libido (things like taking small amounts of testosterone).
>or knowing I cannot overcome it
You can. Just lower your libido with hormone therapy. People usually do the opposite, for example, the contraceptive pill lowers some succubi's libido stressing the relationship with her partner, so they do hormone therapy to enhance the libido (things like taking small amounts of testosterone).