No.59980
>>59978cool little creature. I have a macrophotographic lens but I think I'll get a microscope or something so I can go smaller.
No.59981
>>59980You would have a blast with this guy. It was at that translucid stage and I could see all the organs moving in there. It didn't came out in the picture at all. It was quite a challenge to get even these done. All I have is an old smartphone and a magnifying glass. It was around half cm long.
No.60153
Is that RPGmaker? I like that cat, it would be cool if his eyes glowed in the dark
>>60152Is that a.. a ステーキケーキ??? What dark sorcery do I have to cast on my remaining living relatives for them to start cooking me these one a year?
No.60163
>>60153Yeah, I'm working on a game.
My mom made this cat. It's made of two types of clay, one for the body and one for the eyes.
No.60886
What's the point of photorealistic painting anymore if you can just take pictures?
No.60902
>>60886from afar they are no different really, but a painting has texture and if you get very close it is often messy and chaotic which is cool
No.60903
>>60886The same "points" there are in any creative or reproductive artistic endeavor. The act of painting still-life or portraits benefits the artist and end customer in ways photos can not. It's fun to paint anything, it's a fair challenge to reproduce a real thing accurately, skills learned from reproducing something can be applied to creative tasks, and the end product has a material presence that many people value.
No.60905
>>60886>What's the point of photorealistic painting anymore if you can just take pictures?Namely that the human reproduction of reality and the camera's aren't the same, even when one can be substituted for another. Witness testimony is notoriously inaccurate, as the mind will fill in a gun just from the gesture of pulling a gun. All vision, to us, is filled with such gestures.
The camera simply emulates the human eye, which has little to do with perceiving reality. We know this because other animals employ different configurations of eyes, or no eyes at all.
t. micolash
No.60907
>>60886You can videotape yourself doing photorealistic paintings. That video would in itself be a very valuable piece of art, and the painting almost only being a leftover relic of it.
No.60908
>>60907>very valuable piece of artWould be more sought after as an instruction tool for other artists.
No.60920
>>60886Photorealistic painting and drawing is a tiny niche. Realism is not synonymous with photorealism.
No.60928
>>60920I was just reading a article on hyperrealism including looking at the art of the most renound artist in the style.
I definitely prefer it over standard photorealism even if I am not a fan of the politics behind many of the works.
No.60937
>>60928>I definitely prefer it over standard photorealismit's literally the same shit
No.61315
>>50531Photo was taken in Kharkiv Eko-Park. A few missiles just landed there today. Some animals were injured. The monkey place was mentioned to be broken but no news on its inhabitants. Hopefully this fella is OK.
No.61316
>>60886photography itself is art and the images depend on lens etc. Even if you see it as a type of lens it is art that cant be created any other way
No.61384
>>52123Keep the photos going my man
No.61385
>>55570Cans are dope as fuck. I need a can zone at my house
No.61436
>>61435There is a wagie in each of these windows.
No.61437
some really wonderful stuff in this thread
No.61438
>>61437Agreed, I never thought of photography as something I could get into, I'm more of a videographer but this thread makes me want to take photos
No.62393
https://www.vintag.es/2016/04/stunning-vintage-photos-of-everyday.htmlwhere do sites obtain vintage japanese photographs? is there some central archiver of this stuff? maybe japanese libraries?
No.62930
https://www.flickr.com/photos/196713437@N04/page1i uploaded all my shit from japan a few years ago to flickr. these are from the dslr. i had a smartphone i used to take photos as well, not sure where those pictures are at the moment though.
No.63667
>>51214Thanks for this post. It's something i want to get into this year and it's a lot to wrap your head around. I was looking at prices for cameras and i was blown away by how expensive these things get.
No.65439
>>63663the electric tree reminds me of japan, good shot
No.65576
Thinking of buying a Panasonic Lumix GX85. Anyone have one or thoughts on it or something better for a reasonable price?
No.65585
>>65577
Yeah it it looks solid and reasonably priced. I honestly don't know much about cameras so i thought i'd ask.
No.67453
>>61435this is really pretty
No.67870
I love photography as once in a while I riffle along the photos I take and remember the good and bad memories. Now I don't have to worry about forgetting, I just bring my camera everywhere
No.67885
Is it possible for a quadriplegic to do photography as a hobby?
No.68034
>>48726>Any photography hobbyists here?I suppose I'm a pro actually.
I went through a course, got certificate and I've went through a couple of months of practice in a studio. I did some photos during a wedding, a baptism or two, learned how to put them on mugs (like pic related), did some photo restorations, but mostly did boring photos of people for their documents like passports and driving licenses.
That being said, my photos are still fucking ugly and I don't have much to show. Somehow once taking photos became a job it also lost a lot of its appeal as a hobby and I haven't touched my SLR camera in years. Funny how that works.
No.68100
>>51191These are beautiful OP,at least compared to the other ones in this thread.
No.68101
>>51191Are these shot on film.
No.68105
>>68100>at least compared to the other ones in this thread.Rude prude
>>68101If by "film" you mean "a digital camera" then yes.
No.68200
>>68034Is it a hard field to get into/ make a living off? Seems like something i wouldn't absolutely loath like most wage cuckery
No.68207
>>68034If people paid you for your photos then I am sure they are far from ugly.