No.67597
>>67595Go away.
Use distractions that are at least tangible.
No.67600
i OP, i have a genuine interest in create a public entity(servitor) with the purpose of helping Wizards throught the astral plane, similar to a goetia daemon, but obviously not as powerful in the beginning. We can create its sigil and charging him using various methods. The advantage of a public servitor is that it becomes powerful in much less time than a personal servitor.
However, the creator must take care and not put its configuration any ill intentions. For the sake of safety it must be a temporal servitor that can last from anything between six months to one year after he's charged. But in general its fairly safe, a artificial elemental will never be dangerous as a real daemon. The main purpose is to becomes a personal spiritual body guard for no more than a bunch of wizards.
No.67601
>>67597First post is indubitably the best post, magic is for succubi and eunuchs.
No.67602
if you want real magic, learn psychology
No.67603
>>67601>says that in a website called wizardchan you good, pal?
No.67604
>>67603Wizardry is not magic, it is elemental power drawn from male virginity at the age of 30. What you propose is sorcery, you mental midget.
No.67606
They said I would gain the wizard powers of a lvl 5 wizard by remaining a virgin loser. I'm a virgin loser and still can't shoot fireballs.
No.67615
I am highly skeptical of magic but at the same time I have an interest in it. My study of science leads me to be skeptical of things that you cannot empirically test.
Nevertheless I am open minded. The school of magic that seems most plausible to me is chaos magic.
No.67617
>>67616What is the clear distinction between alchemy and chemistry?
No.67619
>>67617esoterism, the other one being science
No.67625
Did the occult wizzer do any research into bio-electricity and the earth's magnetic fields? I find it very interesting that it is possible to transmit information using magnetism and wonder whether or not these fields could be an explanation for supposed telepathy, remote viewing etc
IE some thoughts leak out into a person's bioelectrical field, which possibly could be accessed by tapping into the earth's magnetic field. The evidence for "telepathy" is often quite sleight, a 5-10% increase in hit rate for normal people but some seem to be unusually lucky when they do this.
Satan-min made this site reliant on google recapcha just to torture us
No.67666
>>67600I could help in this activity, but my abilities leave much to be desired. if you are interested, write your discord or email men
No.67693
>>67615Magic is actually something you should empirically test, in that regard, it is akin to science.
The difference is that the results of magic are highly subjective, as they are in the domain of the subconscious and superconscious. They do not pertain to physical matter but to your own deep psychology, and western science has made virtually no progress whatsoever in this area. As a corollary, magic is also not quantifiable or measurable, therefore not apt for the methods of science.
There is also a very great deal of charlatanery surrounding it, and much of what is of substance is obscured by arcane language, such as with alchemy, and unfamiliar imagery from mystical traditions long neglected in our rationalist/materialist mindset.
It is imperative that the practicant be a sceptic at all times.
No.67694
>>67693shit i can't write, s/sceptic/skeptic/ stay clean wiz
No.67773
>>67595What's this diagram? I think I saw it a couple of times in anime or somewhere? Does it have some meaning?
No.67777
>>67774You have forgotten the most important thing to say that the entire Western tradition in magic is built on this system. And this is the basis of all occultism, but there are other systems that copy it
Sorry for being a bit of a bore. It's just important to me, I spend a lot of time studying the Great Work
(and I'm still the author of the thread)
No.67779
>>67777>You have forgotten the most important thing to say that the entire Western tradition in magic is built on this systemI haven't forgotten because that isn't even remotely true.
There is more to the various western traditions then the golden dawn style kabbalah inspired high ceremonial magic.
It is but one branch on a very big very old tree. It isn't the whole tree.
No.67781
>>67779You shouldn’t speak so negatively about Zara, she gives basic understanding. What do you want to say under the big tree? I only know about two trees. Where can I read about this?
No.67782
>>67781Schizo post aren't funny.
Stop.
No.68562
>>67779>>67782Seems like a samefaggy Wicca wizzy to me…
Those interested in similar subject matter would also do well to look into the Qlippoth as well. Feel free to ignore the ramblings of this FOOL.
No.68600
>>67595I studied geophysics at university and I have read fair amount of physics. I teach and tutor physics and maths as a profession.
One thing to understand is that physics does not explain reality; it describes it. A magnetic field is a description of a region in which iron, nickel or cobalt will experience a magnetic force. We have have detailed mathematical descriptions of the way in which these objects experience forces. Maxwell’s equations. Perfect mathematical description of the electric and magnetic fields.
But this still does not answer why there is a force of magnetic attraction. Why do things fall? Aristotle said Earth attracts Earth. Newton said mass attracts to mass with a force inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the masses. But why? Einstein said that it is because the masses warp space time - 4D description of space and time that we can use to make predictions that can be tested. But why?
Each description in physics just pushes the why question one further back.
Schopenhauer saw that physics is a description of the surface of things. But the surface is implying a depth. A depth of something unknowable or at least untestable at the moment.
No.68601
>>68600nice post, god knows what will happen if we have the answers of these questions
No.68602
>>68601Engineres would uses said answers to create things informed by the improvement in understanding.
Scientist would use them as starting points for the next questions to explore.
No.68603
>>68602dince youre a geophysics can you tell me if a river can cross a coline?
No.68605
>>68603This guy>>68602 was not me. No disrespect to him but I think English might not be his first language.
I studied geophysics at university. I did my third year dissertation on near surface geophysics. I have never heard of a 'coline'.
No.68606
>>68605what I mean is,
can a river cross a mountain?
sorry I'm also an ESL
No.68607
>>68606you mean like through a tunnel?
or going uphill momentarily?
No.68608
>>68607>going uphill momentarily?yes, a river crossing a mountain going uphill and then go down