>>296360>Finally I will say that if you are:Not him. But let's try to instead consider a realistic American.
>-physically healthy/normalYou should instead assume he is prediabetic, has at least one autoimmune disorder that will either cause cancer or cause organ damage before he turns 50, and has significant tendon atrophy that will prevent vigorous full body exercise within 4 to 8 years. That's only if we treat him as a normal American, and without reference to lifestyle disorders that are likely to be more common in longterm social abjects or NEETs.
>-don't have any chronic pain problemsIt would be more fair to assume he has mild chronic pain in one of the following locations:
-Feet
-Elbows
-Knees
However, I have found that there is a significant number of posters on this site who have chronic pain in the following other locations:
-Neck
-Shoulder
-God save you if this is your case, but jaw and tooth.
>-domiciled in a safe houseThis is in practice never the case and I have no idea why you would make that as an assumption. Do you mean "a housing standards act compliant apartment with no visible black mold" instead?
>-fed and clothedFood prices and food stamp program restrictions usually mean major compromises on the more important of these two. Even the most well known nutritional disorder on Earth, scurvy, is currently making a major comeback. It was already on the rise from 2016 through 2020, mostly in individuals with Autism Spectrum disorders:
https://www.news-medical.net/news/20240719/Scurvy-on-the-rise-in-the-United-States-Pediatric-cases-triple-in-five-years.aspx–but, man, in 2020-22 grocery stores were selling oranges with mold on their skin and lifestyle/spending adjustments met with prices to make increases in scurvy cases a fact-of-life for commoners.