>>298932Not that guy, but thank you for posting this.
I had the same mind set for decades but the appeal petered out since the coof; this capped it.
On topic - I despised parties, my friends were superficial and my college/university experience was, largely, that of a monk with a vow of silence.
No regrets - apart from the time and motion wasted thinking it could/should be otherwise and trying to change it. Self development and building capital meant I have more and nicer things and a better quality of life, than the superficial friends that followed the same track with me but wasted their efforts in other superficial people and chasing hedonism.
If you're a depressive and struggle to feel anything about anything, why exactly should anyone want to engage with you about any given activity - unless the activities themselves have some value? Conversely, if both you and others have gotten this far without engaging, then is there a need to change?
Historically folks engaged with people because there were limited resources and limited venues to enjoy/consume things, e.g. malls, cinemas, coffee shops, sportsball venues etc. You had to interact because people were in front of and beside you, eventually concessions and arrangements sprang up.
This is no longer mandatory - it's entirely possible to have a superior experience of consumption or activity in the context of your own living space. Amazon/Ebay/Alibaba have effectively "solved" retail, a HD projector goes for $300~, a good coffee machine for similar etc.
If anything then you're fortunate - you have not grown and developed with a need for people in your daily routine which would skew your value structure. Better, you have safely avoided strong and memorable experiences which would make you less satisfied with your every day median, and bland uneventfulness *is* the normal.