/lounge/ - Lounge

The second reason is the coalition between western feminist succubi and non-whites for advancing redistributive policies has ended, it has quietly ended. In the 2010s in corporate offices, you seen ambitious career succubi and non-whites had an alliance and a material interests in advancing DEI policies. There was a larger white male share of the pie for both non-whites and western succubi to feast upon. The support for redistributive policies requires the hardening of grievances of all involved to get sufficient numbers, so they never commented on or criticized one another. Both focused on what was, at that time, a perceived mutual enemy, white men. After Covid, that ended, it ended because the white male share of the pie has declined so much that western succubi are now next on the line. Non-white corporate and political nepotism can overcome the feminist cries of "sexist", but western succubi are still vulnerable to cries of "racism". Western succubi are also atomized themselves to an extent, and facing a whole mobilized racial bloc, and must know they could be potentially crushed. I do believe western succubi are seeing the non-white threat to their material wellbeing now, and are disincentivized from fueling the DEI politics. From the other end, non-whites are more willing to push against things like #MeToo and western feminist standards in the workplace, as they have the numbers now and it's their culture to treat succubi a certain way. Potential Harvey Weinsteins are being replaced by Indian doctors and foreign nursing home workers in their thousands sexually harassing people. And of course nons close ranks around their own. It's becoming harder for feminists to enforce feminist norms in the workplace.

The third reason is that there's simply a cafeteria assortment of traditional cultural structures for western men to choose from now, if they want more traditional succubi. Back when you wrote Sexual Utopia in Power, and back in the early days of the sexual revolution, there wasn't that choice in a meaningful quantity to have a social impact. Western men had to take the raw deal that was on offer or be alone. You even advised young men to "learn an Eastern European language" as you recognized they were searching for and deserving of a better deal. it's becoming more that western whites are being dragged towards traditional social structures than the opposite. The western feminist doesn't actually want to give up her privileges and go with the foreign. For all the past feminist teasing about how white men are sexually jealous of them being with others, the alternative to white westerners is just so much worse for western succubi. The young western succubus is increasingly facing heavy sexual competition from non-white succubi from less assimilated foreign cultures, who do behave feminine, who are to an extent white worshipping still in a lot of ways. And she necessarily has to adapt to the sexual threat by mimicry, she finds herself becoming more feminine. What was once the effort of getting a mail order bride, or finding 1/1000 in your city, is now an open option for young men. The next generation is sitting across from this open option at school and work. To the extent that mixing is happening, it's increasingly resembling a dragging of the feminist west towards traditional gender roles instead of the opposite. We are very used to seeing it play out as the opposite with non-whites leaving their culture for ours because that's how it played out in the 70s, 80s, 90s, 00s, etc. But the flip in how assimilation works may have already happened.

The forth reason being the massive sheer quantity of debt and necessity of austerity in every western country is chipping away at succubi's economic status. The patronized government jobs that have artificially lifted succubi up materially and economically are becoming more scarce as the cuts set in, and as the cuts happen, they'll face battles with ethnic minorities to keep those jobs. Welfare is also looking more precarious as they're battling pensioners, who are likewise pigheaded about their gibs. I've talked to non-white migrants that have settled in western countries, and they almost universally react with absolute disgust towards our tolerance of single mothers everywhere getting absurd amounts of money. Indians, Indonesians, Arabs, etc. They are paying western tax, and the second they find out that succubi divorcing their husbands are making the same on welfare as what UberEats Indians are making at work, they immediately start thinking "Well why not us too? Why don't us working men get hundreds of dollars a week?". I remember being around a foreign non-white migrant when the visa laws changed and he couldn't get residency in this country. On the day of the announcement he started yelling and venting about how single mothers are everywhere in the west getting so much more money than so many hard workers like him, how hard workers like him are given the raw deal, how westerners are lazy, and how it isn't fair. There is real resentment and anger towards it, and there's millions of them now here and voting. Indians and other non-white migrants want to extend those welfare benefits to themselves and their families, and remove the feminist/succubus bias in how they're paid out. The more egregious parts of the sexual revolution are predicated on the ability to divorce and dispose of the husband, and get the husband to pay for the wife still, and the sheer quantity of welfare going to single mothers giving a comfortable lifestyle. If that ends, and being a single mother becomes fiscally dangerous, and they become reliant on charity, then the sexual revolution backslides instantly. 

Non-white migrants also look at fear at the same broken families and social dysfunction they see in the west infecting them. Their romantic mythology as to why they're able to replace us is because they're harder workers, with stronger families, and a better culture. If you actually listen to what many of them say, they say it's our single motherhood and divorce rates that reveal we're weak and lazy, that we're culturally inferior to them, and that set replacement migration in motion. They have an incentive to end the temptation of their own people falling victim to the sexual revolution and feminism. It's actually an existential threat in many of their eyes.

My personal anecdotal experience with the world is that this decline of feminism is happening. I don't see the next generation of succubi coming up doing the callous "I hate white men" statements I heard so much through the 2010s. That seemed to peak with the Millennial generation, and decline with the Zoomers, especially young Zoomers. I think Covid, BLM and the abortion law changes in the US were all blips that disguised a general trend. Yet apparently the polling consistently shows that succubi are becoming more radicalized in feminism, more left leaning, more politically radicalized on the left. That's said, and it's repetitively said, and the polls do show it, and it does throw a wrench in my theory. But for all the talk of the crabosphere/far right politics/manosphere politics being apparently due to men failing in the modern world, not finding their place, and not handling a social backsliding, can the political radicalization of western succubi match that theory? Their doubling down and hardening into the political left is because they do witness their declining privileges and social power, and are reflexively leaning into what historically gave them more power. As the new reality sets in, maybe that will dissipate away very rapidly and western succubi will find a home on the political right. 

A final point is that the places that have the most radical form of feminism still, with the 4B movement, are actually in East Asia, in places like South Korea. They actually still wield significant power and it's not declining like feminist power is in the west. I believe that's because the racial dynamic hasn't thrown off the gender tensions over there as there's less replacement migration. South Koreans are still racially supremacist culturally, and they import non-Koreans to work jobs and then deport them when their time is up, similar to the gulf states. Everywhere western with mass non-white migration seems to be expressing the same feminist decline I've laid out above.