/meta/ - Meta

>>64598
not your ideas, /pol/, the thread

>>64600
Why shouldn't we allow such topics though? Why is the only common counterargument for allowing political discussions always something like "We shouldn't allow politics because it's from /pol/"? Sometimes particularly butthurt users try to say something like "Because politics is from /pol/ and /pol/ is full of NORMIES" (which is what you said in the OP pretty much), but that's just fractal logic. We could say the same about not allowing cooking threads because /ck/ is mostly full of normalfags and succubi.

>>64601
because /pol/ thread is pretty immature

>>64601
nevermind, we can keep it, I don't mind anymore

>>64602
>>64603
Talk about bi-/pol/-ar

>>64601
polfags are cancer this should be self evident and require no explanation

>>64605
But there are no "polfags" here… Someone posting a political opinion you disagree with in the single politics thread is not automatially a /pol/fag 4cuck cringechan invader ruining the site.

>>64606
you really think it's impossible for polfags from 4chan to come in here and post in the pol threads. That could never happen. Why? Because people have opinions! lol. If people want to talk about politics, it's not like this is the only site that you can do it on. That is the single best reason we don't need a pol thread. The pol thread only invites polfags. It's simple and obvious. It is not a containment strategy. Just look how that worked for moot. Literally driven off his own site by polfags because he decided to "contain" instead of eliminate them.

>>64608
Also admin, I urge you to carefully consider what I am saying here. Consider the cautionary tale of 4chan. You might say, well polfags are such a big source of potential traffic, and most of them are virgins, so why not invite them in and make them feel comfortable? Well the might be virgins, but they are all crabs not volcels. They are all normalfags with normalfag views of the world. They worship Donald Trump because he is a "winner" by conventional means and they thing "winning" is the goal in life and they are looking for political resolutions to make it easier. They are mad that it's hard to get a good job and they blame immigrants and want to use politics to make it easier to succeed within the current paradigm. All of this is so they can get pussy which they believe is being denied to them by the immigrants. This is the basic belief structure of the crab polfag. They spend endless time whining about how the world isn't fair to crabs like them. They spend endless time jerking off over their own superiority as "white people" who are "winners" in the conventional normalfag world view. They spend amazing amounts of time obsessing over those they view as insufficiently conforming to social norms so that they can feel superior for doing so and band together in a sense of shared hatred. Victimhood and hatred is what binds them together. These are not good people and we don't want them here. They are why 4chan went to shit. This should be uncontroversial and obvious for anyone who knows anything about imageboards.

>>64608
You advocate for total banishment of "polfags"… And yet you will forever define "Polfag" as "Literally anyone I deem to have an opinion that I don't agree with or is talking about something I don't want to talk about myself.

Is the guy in the anime thread talking about how Chinese animation is inferior a "polfag"? If you're someone who is Chinese, then he probably is to you. When discussion come sup over how unhealthy Indian food is for a wizard looking to cut back on sodium… All participants are "polfags" to the fat Indian. Democrats passed a law making it illegal to criticize crabs? To you that's a good thing, to everyone else, it makes them a "polfag".

Butthurt brown.

guys, I think most of polfags who come here to talk about politics in the pol thread are , I have a feeling, normalfags

>>64610
> Democrats passed a law making it illegal to criticize crabs? To you that's a good thing, to everyone else, it makes them a "polfag".

If fighting for my freedom to criticize crabs makes me a polfag, then I guess even I'm a polfag

>>64611
Are non-whites even allowed here. Wish there was rule for banning non humans since they add no value.

I agree m it should be bannable

The political thread is on page 5 with like 20 post and hasn't been touched in a month.

Pretending political discussion is a major problem on this site is fucking retarded.
There isn't much political bullshit, what is there isn't super disruptive, and it isn't causing any measurable issues on the site.

This is just blatant "ban everything I personally don't like and anyone who doesn't agree with me".

>>64609
Unironically you're right. But you forget that most of this board's population is made up of zoomers from 4chin to begin with who have no experience of imageboards despite whining about politics with the same behavior on loop, polfags won't go away unless they're driven away, which is something the jannies doesn't seem to want to do. This will be another dead imageboard in less than a year with two occasional sheeps who repeat the same shit every polfag/mentally impaired republican did for the last 10 years. Thinking the only purpose of imageboards are politics, despite using boards at best after 2018 which is the moment where boards declined to begin with. Libs aren't any better but at least they don't browse these imageboards to ruin them with their presence. Whatever, I tried to instill a bit of life on this imageboard but since it's just a nu-4chin /pol/ NEET version then i'll be off somewhere else.

If any of you polfags are reading, fuck off, don't bother replying I won't read.

>>64866
op here don't bother, I was against pol but now I'm ok with it. they mostly stay in their thread. they shit up /b/ tho

>>64867
Well then, enjoy.

>>64867
its not just /b/. he are spammonf hitler pictures all around the website