>>316276Cowardice, moral weakness, and ressentiment. Disguised with disgracefully feminine appeal-to-normalcy social centering emotional appeals ("HE WAS A FATHER" – to adults he rendered bastards when he delegitimized his marriage. "HE HAD A WIFE" – whom he divorced, disgracing himself and herself and making adulterers of them both in they eyes of Christ. "HE WAS SELF-MADE" – by jewish financiers in a fraudulent sector through means no nobler than a crypto scamcoin rugpuller).
No, the real reason is that members of the peasantry know deep in their bones that they require a warrior aristocracy just to survive and that just as Thompson lacked the nobility of spirit to uplift his nation so too would and will they themselves betray, devour and destroy each other to prosper while leaving the current system undisturbed forever.
>>316279>1. it cleverly shapes the public's imagination of who the enemy is by repeatedly showing the face of a white male CEO1. Always kill a traitor before an enemy.
2. Everyone including the anti-israel commie streamer morons on twitch knows that the enemy is behind the face, every leftoid mouthpiece on this planet is telling them that the enemy in this case is "private equity," or "investment capital," or any other synonym for the same hidden hands.
>the recent visible villainy of jewish pharma groupsIt is unbelievably shortsighted to refuse to fight one enemy just because another enemy is currently using that first enemy to attack your people.
>against fabricated malefactors UHC was a malefactor for a very long time. You just weren't paying attention. It's okay to have not been paying attention to fronts that were not immediately arrayed against yourself. The honorable thing to do is to acknowledge that your vision is more clearly trained on other matters closer to yourself. It is dishonorable and pathetic to disparage the one single victory on that front just because you personally were not there.
>3. it quietly erodes the public's memory of the covid hoax by replacing it with a loudly broadcast new more important issue Memory of all the issues associated with covid is if anything renewed by this at a time when state enforced healthcare scams were being swept under the rug. UHC received 100 billion dollars from the Biden Administration, more than America's national defense contractors, and that fact being resurfaced now is bringing AMerican attention back to the HC-to-Pharma scandals of the past four years. You're just not willing to run one single step with the touchdown pass that has been thrown to you because you would prefer to abandon God Throne and Altar over acknowledging a living man's physical courage. And it is hardly a "new more important issue." Obamacare scandals have existed since 2007 when Goldman-Sachs financiers' e-mails to the then unelected Obama presidential campaign hand-selected his entire cabinet to shape how healthcare would be redefined, as revealed by Julian Assange during the DNC email leak in the 2016 election.
>4. it offers an apparent legitimate impetus for reformingAssassination is not legitimate, as legitimate refers to within the rules and within the law. Assassination is the declaration that the rules and law have lost all authority. It is war. It is systemic disbelief. Attempts to use it to goad us all back into reformism would be much, much, much easier through any other method which would be easier to stage. The effectiveness of assassination as a lead to reformism rely entirely on the moral cowardice of the public at large, since the deed's value was precisely in severing the control of reformist procedure.
>the "healthcare" industryYou are right to put quotes around that. I stand corrected. I will now stop referring to this man's business as healthcare. He was an insurance salesman. A fraudulent insurance scammer whose main customers were financiers and the large corporations those financiers manipulated into buying his intentionally defective product. From now onwards I will refer to this as a question of the INSURANCE and FINANCE industries.
>which will be used to further take attention off jewish pharma and their still surviving total control of medicine/drugs/money. Pharma is only one sector of this system warped by the insurance and finance industries to exert total control over American's health, wealth, and happiness. Striking directly at the malefactor has implications for housing, for employment, and for manufacture in ways that some disinhehritance of Pfizer which would just be reconstituted or some murder of some Rothschild who would just be respawned could not.
>5. it re-solidifies the "evils" of the right-wing and of Christianity, as "mangione" is being portrayed as a crazy right-wing Christian. It solidifies the virtues and necessity of a dedicated warrior of Christ before the eyes of limp leftoid slimes who have been otherwise long seeking exactly that chrism, though they knew it not. If he is indeed a dedicated Christian I would expect a wave of gen-z nihilists to baptize and devote themselves to the Lord in the wake of that news.
>6. it reintroduces the question of gun control It has not, except among Republicans who will not pursue it further than as a nag.
>The Normans were crypto-jews. And this "Mangione" character is a nobody brought to life out of thin air by the media masters for a season of propaganda. Ah yes, I see now. White men have no history of self governance whatsoever and cannot build or establish a single civilization in all of Europe, the Scandinavian roots of Guiscard were pure fantasy, only Jews would charge on horseback against a field of spears and then weepingly repent of their sins to the Pope. All the things the Norman houses of the Crusades were known for, physical courage and reckless abandon, rebellion and repentance, sharp but brittle honor and an unwillingness to engage in the intrigues that typified the thrones of Paris and Byzantium and the Turk, by all of these we must see the Jew. Martial valor is truly a trait that only the Jew could possess and white men should dishonor the Crusades and refer to them as unjust imperial colonial heterosexual wars.
>A "real vigilante"–commits vigilantism, instead of refusing to commit vigilantism in lieu of sending strongly worded letters concern trolling and clicking his tongue at the vigilantism that he sees unfold before him.