No.224046
>>222742At least 50% of us could get on a dating app right now and fuck.
Here's my excuses for why I dont
>not uggo but very fat, and "le put the fork down" doesnt work for me because food gives me energy to wageslave all day>still stay at home, and I'm terrified of driving anywhere that isnt work or the gas station, so I couldnt pick up a date and bring her to a hotel or whatever>small dick but that's the least of my concerns at this point. im a submissive fag who could get off from eating pussy alone and i doubt most chicks would pass up a free tonguejob No.224047
>>224046Lmao. There are literal athletic highly salaried extroverted normies who just got unlucky with face genetics or shortness whining on Reddit they can't get a single match on Tinder in months.
A fat geek would have literally 0 chance.
Also, I don't WANT to have sex nor deal with succubi unless forced to in an official capacity.
No.224048
>>224047>A fat geek would have literally 0 chance. Every fat geek I know has a girlfriend, wife, and some even have a child.
>I don't WANT to have sex nor deal with succubi unless forced to in an official capacity.There's no such thing as being forced to have sex, unless you're an Indian. Are you?
No.224053
>>224052
>normalfag
This is an extremely old imageboard term. It's from the 2000s
No.224054
>>224048Nobody denied they can't buy a trophy wife after 30-35 if they have a good salary. I mean that's my parents in a nutshell.
No.224069
>>224046>>224047Dating apps were designed for succubi to choose partners. Most men aren't successful with it. As a succubus you only have to upload a pic about yourself and even if you are ugly or old some desperate guy will text you. Not some, but dozens. Even 1/10 succubi have like a million guys texting them on these dating apps.
No.224070
>>224069painfully aware of that. it was actually hilarious how that delusional guy in this thread said half of wizards could just go on there today and have pick of the litter.
like no, that's not how it works at all. you need to look like a 9/10 male to get even remotely similar results to a 1/10 succubus. the vast majority of ordinary looking or ugly men get literally nothing from these apps and its very documented.
No.224073
>>224070He pulled out the dating app stats to "prove" that a dude needs to be top 10% in looks in order to have sex! LOL!
No.224074
so to put it very bluntly, about 2% of men who are extremely good looking basically get to form harems with the countless succubi who show sexual interest towards them on these dating apps.
the rest don't even get matches which they could use to talk to succubi. they just swipe and swipe and either get nothing all month or 1-2 matches from low quality individuals despite being a regular chubby guy with a job.
these apps are a joke for anyone who isn't a chad or succubus. they even harvest money from ugly guys in the form of gold and platinum memberships that "boost visibility" (which still leads to nothing because they are essentially advertising an old corolla (ugly face guy) while the app has a bunch of new lamborghinis (male models), so succubi have no incentive to settle on the lower option.
No.224075
/wiz/ - Succubi's dating preferences and lookism
No.224077
>>224073no, this discussion was only about internet dating apps. in real life an ugly guy can still throw money at the issue snd for example pay for a prostitute, or pay for a succubus to marry him and share his lifestyle if he has enough resources.
dating apps are a joke for ugly men.
also, a wizard has no incentive to be on one regardless
No.224078
>>224077>in real life an ugly guy can still throw money at the issue snd for example pay for a prostitute, or pay for a succubus to marry him and share his lifestyle if he has enough resources.Or he could meat a succubus through normal social activities, get to know her, win her over, get married, and have kids. That's how 99% of men do it, even those you'd obsessively call ugly or sub-10% or some other /r9k/-ism
No.224079
>>224078that doesn't happen to 99 percent of men that's why so many are single and sexless you retard
No.224080
>>224077>pay for a prostitutethat's not a solution. You can't have a relationship with a prostitute and she sees you as another loser who needs to pay for sex so she will never respect you or be interested in you.
>pay for a succubus to marry himthat's not an option for most men. succubi already outearn men or make as much money as them. Most succubi will rather be single and hookup with someone handsome than to be with an ugly guy who has money.
No.224081
>>224079>why so many are single and sexless you retardWe're not talking about India here.
No.224092
>>224078This is true. Most people just get to know a succubus they happened to meet randomly while either at work or at some social gathering. There is no big secret here.
>>224080>she sees you as another loser who needs to pay for sex so she will never respect you or be interested in youYou just described the average succubus in average relationshit. So what's the problem with prostitutes really?
>Most succubi will rather be single and hookup with someone handsome than to be with an ugly guy who has money.Oh wow, so how do you explain the fact that so many ugly people exist? Think about it. It's all about genes, right? How do you think those ugly genes got passed down to you or other ugly people? It's painfully obvious that there is a contradiction in your world-view. Succubi will rather fuck a rich orc or an ugly disgusting ex-con who appears to be tough than bother with a handsome man who is mentally retarded and socially awkward.
No.224099
>>224092>How do you think those ugly genes got passed down to you or other ugly people?>so how do you explain the fact that so many ugly people exist?because the succubi who reproduce are still ugly you stupid dumb fuck.
No.224107
>>224092Not only do ugly succubi pass on their genes, genetic recombination is a thing. Two relatively ok looking parenrs can produce an utterly hideous offspring.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_recombination No.224119
>>224099>>224107Regardless of this, the point still stands more or less. Ugly guys have gfs and wives all the time, even short guys too. But some people just refuse to understand reality, that succubi care more about money and power than they care about your muscles or jawline. crabs think it's all about their looks while the problem is with their mentality. We can argue whether personality can be inherited or not and if yes to what extent but that's besides the point. Looks only matter on dating apps, in real life it's different.
No.224271
>>222743I keep myself in shape out of pure fear because I want to be able to outrun anybody who wants to harm me, we are not the same
No.224278
>>224119The average fertile 18-25 year old isn't dating Bill Gates or other billionaires. They're dating broke hot guys who are 19-28.
No.224303
>>224278That's because ultra-rich people can only date or fuck so many hot young succubi. I mean it's natural that the majority would be left with your average poor "hot" guy.
No.224860
>>223358bringing up schopenhauer is muddling the discussion.
"it's all just a ruse" is still either a materialist way of thinking or at the very least a reductivist one, because even if schopenhauer was an idealist he still reduced all phenomena to the will and because of that ended up arriving to a conception of sex that is very much compatible with the dominant materialist one of today, even decades before darwin's scientific contributions.
so you need neither idealism nor "eastern philosophy and religion" to see that the sex drive itself has a very different purpose than the lived subjective experience it manifests as in individual organisms.
No.225329
Yes.
Had to tell a friend of my friend I have some potentially loose screws - so its better not to bother my poorly mounted sanity with sexxooo
No.225357
>>222742>I'm honestly not sure if I'm just asexual at this point. My single biggest fear is sex with a succubus, even if I was explicitly offered it I would most likely decline. I do everything in my power to make sure I'm as unattractive as possible, on the off chance a succubus might be attracted to me, which I find deeply disturbing. Does anyone else relate?Are you terrified of using VR? You'd have the visual without the physical presence.
No.225359
>>224860>see that the sex drive itself has a very different purpose than the lived subjective experience it manifests as in individual organisms.Are you still going on about it feels good but it is bad? It's still a partial perspective.
No.225363
>>225359It wasn’t necessarily about the physical pleasure of sex and sexual attraction (because it can have the exact opposite consequences) that I had in mind with that sentence, but the latent vs manifest functions of the sex drive.
For example, the tragedy of Romeo and Juliet’s love story (and the way both characters subjectively experience it) has nothing to do with reproduction and having kids, and them having sex has a completely different subjective meaning to them (manifest functions).
But then, why are a young man and a teenage virgin succubus so attracted to each other to begin with? And why does sex have so much significance in that? It’s for underlying biological causes going back billions of years directed at evolution through natural selection (latent functions) that are not immediately transparent to individual human consciousness and that humanity has only started to discover very late into its existence.
So yes, I’m still going on about this perspective, but I would say “it feels good” is kinda unfair as an interpretation since it also causes one to find love music, stories, art, etc., beautiful and noble and sublime. But that’s also part of evolution’s trick to get you to reproduce. (Obivously there are loopholes.)
What do you have in mind with partial? What do you think my perspective is missing?
No.225364
>>225363From a biological perspective it's obvious that everything we think, feel and do is related to survival and reproduction. The whole pessimistic tradition is based on the perspective that nature and society are organized in such a way that we are doomed to cause drama and suffering for ourselves and others. Alan Watts has addressed this perspective and put forward an alternative perspective with many of his books and lectures.
No.225365
>>225364we're undergoing a "population explosion" phase of a pump it - dump it
which can also be found in by-oh-lo-geekish cyclopedia sets
No.226572
>>222742>OPSame, I guess…
No.226588
The idea of letting someone down sure sort of gets me worked up but then lose interest
No.226665
>>222742Unless you're a bacterium
Sex
is life No.226694
>>226665Flowers like roses are designed to self-pollenate, that's not exactly procreating by seggs too.
And for flowers that do release pollen in the air, it's not the *stressor* at least - a blooming flower does not really care about own wellbeing let alone the released pollen's fate
No.226696
>>226694It's a different game but I get your point.
Everything has to survive first and then complete a quest. It is what it is.
No.226701
>>226696The penultimate human quest is really no less animalistic than that of other species.
You struggle to find the best possible mate, then you try to have kids, then you try to ensure they don't die during pregnancy or birth, but oh nope, it doesn't end there.
After that you need to secure your offspring plenty of resources, shelter and safety so they don't just instadie. You need to keep doing this until they're mature enough to go out and potentially start their own family which takes about 2 decades, or 3+ in southern cultures.
It's just a bland survival/procreation MMO with all sorts of pointless random variables and diversions. You're not allowed to even exist in the game unless your parents chose to play it before you.
You don't even get to choose what your character looks like, it automatically defaults to your breeders with some variance and random quirky mutations.
No.226702
>>226665>Sex is lifeMaybe for you sexhaver. Saging this normalfag thread
No.226711
>>226702It's the honest truth, that's all bio life really is. You're a coward, wallow in illusion.
>>226701>The penultimate human quest is really no less animalistic than that of other species.truth
No.226739
>>226665Let's assume your point is the axiom.
Then, we get BIOLOGY - Reproductive studies
And then what? We get to learn about "population explosion" from such studies.
Some good year allows rabbits breed like, well, rabbits.
Then what? Then, throughout a *normal* year, all the rabbits who failed to find enough food, will… you know, kick the bucket. So, a wizard rabbit who was busy hoarding a boatload of food throughout the good year won't change the total amount of rabbits inhabiting the forest later.
No.226741
>>226739I don't deny that, however when I die I don't give a shit what happens to the "forest" (as an analogy to society) and neither does the forest care two shits about me.
Just let wizards stay in peace and leave us alone.
No.226743
At the end of the day, humans have a population explosion.
It's up to people who work hard or work smart or both to create a world that can accommodate seven/eight/nine/ten/twelve/twenty/…ty/and so on billion people. Yet it's not up to people who keep doing things the same way our ancestors did. It is not up to people who keep focusing their efforts into procreating and building families.
See, there had been too many problems with holding the path of creating families only to find them ruined, destroyed, splitted throughout XX century. After all the "normal" struggle, completely unique kinds of struggling have emerged
No.226746
>>226741>>226739
>So, a wizard rabbit who was busy hoarding a boatload of food throughout the good year won't change the total amount of rabbits inhabiting the forest later.Triple this.
Some (technology-related?) cataclysm may decimate human population this century anyway similar to a forest fire.
>>226696leave us alone.
No.226749
>>226739>Let's assume your point is the axiom.We don't have to, it's already in the definition.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life
>BIOLOGY - Reproductive studiesStudies of the reproductive
>>226741>>226746>Just let me stay in peace and leave me alone.>leave me alone.It's just thread about sex on Wiz, you didn't have to open it.
You don't have to be aggressive.
No.226750
>>226749Sorry, James
let me just say:
DITTO > alle
No.226752
>>226746>>226750>leave us alone.Elaborate, in detail.
No.226799
I've shut myself off and sperged out at a few succubi throughout my life for simply showing interest in me, most of whom were mentally ill. I find the mere possibility of being in a relationship or having sex deeply terrifying on a primal level. I'm not sure exactly why but I've always felt bothered by affection and close relations, even with my own family.
>I do everything in my power to make sure I'm as unattractive as possible
Deliberately repulsing succubi is also a hobby of mine. Watching them act awkward and uncomfortable around me is something that I can't help but find strangely entertaining.
No.226846
Wizchan 2025.