>>53446>I'm pretty sure he was [a virgin].
You can't prove that unless you know him irl. Mods have the upper hand here. Any schizo who's unstable enough to explicitly say that he is not a virgin shouldn't be posting on wizchan anyway.>And what would it matter if he wasn't a virgin honestly? The thread is still good regardless of who made it.
I actually agree with you here. If his thread wasn't deleted, mine wouldn't be either.>actually your thread wasn't really all that funny or clever.
Well, like I said, I thought it was funny at the time. If it's funny to me, I post it. That's what shitposting is. Considering the overall quality of /meta/ it's not like my thread made any difference quality-wise.>I also like how you take mods at their word too like a retarded little sheep.
It's not like regular posters have any real power here. Mods call the shots on any and all issues. If you think deleting that thread was unjust (and rightly so), you can call them out on it, like you did. Won't make any difference though, the thread is gone.>Not sure what you're doing at crystal.cafe
They have interesting takes on some issues.>whomever you're trying to attribute anonymous posts to.
He posted the "i'm not a virgin" stuff around the same time on all wizchan boards and his posting style is similar.