/meta/ - Meta

I apologize if this is a stupid question but I am a stupid and that is half the reason I am here My question is if we could have >>>/b/ listed with a warning upon entering that it does not represent wizchan etc. Sorry about the thread to ask.

>>>/b/566919
I reported this but you didn't delete it.

Should we ban younger users from this site? Seems like younger posters are more likely to be failed norms or generally not fit in with the concept of the site. Also, a good amount of them are never going to become wizards. I think the posting age should be 25+

I believe we need to be more specific about the first rule.
>You must be a male virgin and at least 18 years old to use this website.

instead of saying "male" the rule must require posters to have at least one Y chromosome because as it stands now trans "male" virgins can post on wizchan without having the potential to use magic. according to my deep internet search merely having a Y chromosome will make the persona exhibit male characteristics and thus give them the potential to use magic if they don't get their mana drained.

this rule should be sufficient
>You must have at least one Y chromosome, be a virgin and be at least 18 years old to use this website.
alternatively we can clearly define male
>You must be a male virgin and at least 18 years old to use this website. Male here means having at least one Y chromosome.

This is the official thread dedicated to discussion of the Revolutionary Council of True Wizards.

This thread has been created with permission from Wizardchan moderators, as it is only being kept to this one thread in /lounge/.


-We have become very concerned recently with posts spouting a pro-crab agenda. crabs were marked Detrimental to the Wizard Community by the Council two months ago, but they clearly still have some supporters. We would like to remind all users that crabs are not, never were, and never will be Wizards. crabs, by definition, hate the Path of True Wizardry, don't want to be part of it, and want to backstab Wizards in an attempt to increase their own social status and chances of losing their virginity. They are not the same as us, they are as different to a wizard as a sex-having normalfag.

The Revolutionary Council of True Wizards has previously declared waifuism Detrimental to the Wizard Community. Please see our statement on Waifusm and 2D pornography below.

According to the Revolutionary Council of True Wizards, waifuism is Detrimental to the Wizard Community, as it promotes the worship of succubi, and is an outlet for the desired of Failed Normie Male Virgins (crabs). This goes against all of the Three Pillars of Wizardry, which are Solitude, Voluntary Celibacy, and Reclusion.

A common counterargument to this is an assertion which goes along the lines of "2D females are different to 3DPD - their personalities are imagined!". This counterargument is obviously invalid, as one, it goes against the ruling of the Revolutionary Council of True Wizards, and two, it is clearly invalid from a logical standpoint too.

A drawing is a representation of something. It may be an idealized representation, yet even so it is still a representation. Therefore, drawings of anime succubi are still drawings of succubi in the righteous eyes of His Excellency The One True Wizard. 2D pornography can even be considered more Detrimental to the Wizard Community than the alternatives, as not only does it promote the worship of succubi, it even idealizes their most feminine features. We must keep in mind that femininity is the antithesis of Wizardry. The Path of True Wizardry is defined by the maximization of the Three Pillars of Wizardry - femininity by nature entirely goes against Solitude, Voluntary Celibacy, and Reclusion, as all succubi are extroverted normals. From this, we can dedPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

>being so desperate to ban someone you need to make shit up
lol, serious question….
is this going to be a precedent where you ban people talking about christmas in the crawl thread at christmastime? it's not even a religious holiday, it's been a totally secular one since our fucking grandparents were kids, even if you're christian you know that, we talk about christmas in the crawl thread every year

I even made the crawl thread last december a christmas edition

calling ranting about grocery stores hours "politics" is just retarded, stop stretching the definition out like it's your pussy hole, go beat your dog if you're so hard up for a power trip you idiot

There needs to be a formal system of accountability for the moderation staff of this website.

For too long they have abused users and used every deceptive and despicable trick in the book while not even doing their job of moderating discussion according to the rules.

If the mods are held to any standards and don't care about the rules then what good are the rules or moderators at all?

What is the official method for determining whether or not a poster is a male? This absolutely pertains to the website and is not off-topic for /meta/, so please answer already mods. You can't just say that you "confirmed" that a poster is male and not expect people to be confused at that.

Anyone want to explain why the thread needed to be locked when it broke no rules and the posters were totally civil?

It is beyond time that all sexual content on the whole site stops being shoehorned into the same increasingly toxic thread.

>https://crystal.cafe/b/res/70865.html
Why does crystal cafe get cool festive themes but we don't?

requesting cool snowing effect on /b/ please thank you
>https://codepen.io/codeconvey/pen/xRzQay