[ Home ] [ wiz / dep / hob / lounge / jp / meta / games / music ] [ all ] [  Rules ] [  FAQ ] [  Search /  History ] [  Textboard ] [  Wiki ]

/meta/ - Meta

Suggestions and Feedback
[]
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

  [Go to bottom]  [Catalog]  [Reload]  [Archive]

File: 1655161714993.png (125.71 KB, 607x325, 607:325, ClipboardImage.png) ImgOps iqdb

c3d6b No.62278[Reply]

Someone made this post >>>/lounge/290675 of a business using the wojak meme. I replied to this post with another example of businesses using the wojak meme. My post was deleted and I was issued a warning, while the post that I replied to remains up. Please explain the rationale behind your decision to single out my post in particular while ignoring the person I replied to.
17 posts and 3 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

fcc7c No.62323

If it's against the rules to post these memes it should be an actual rule with a number.

1bfd2 No.62324

>>62323
>post wojak
>receive protests
>repost now with pepe
>gets ban
>uses vpn
>comes back
>repeat

>>62313
He mocks whoever claims life is about war… which actually demonstrating his point, lol.

59d18 No.62325

>>62323
It is. Get some basic reading comprehension.
"5: Do not submit low quality, inflammatory or off-topic posts."

1bfd2 No.62329

>>62325
I still dont get the point about getting butthurted by poor, innocent wojak

59d18 No.62340

>>62329
Learn to read you underage faggot. No one likes you insufferable retards.



File: 1655510623874.jpg (127.26 KB, 978x768, 163:128, 1552173936911.jpg) ImgOps iqdb

f3466 No.62306[Reply]

1. you know how images have the metadata?
>File (hide): 1419366981856.png (70.72 KB, 300x100, 3:1, wizzy2.png) ImgOps iqdb
why not youtube videos. can give some indication as to wtf the video is without having to click it. for example:
>Youtube (hide): https://youtube.com/YGEJKHGJEQRGH (10:53, 1920x1080, 16:9, How to embed a youtube video)

2. why not also add (hide) feature. currently you have to hide the entire post?

3. we should also be able to spoiler a youtube embed

4bde3 No.62311

>>62306
it'd involve reaching out to youtube (and the other places wizchon supports embedding from), which exposes you to a bunch of problems from how the internet is currently structured. if youtube doesn't respond do you simply permit a post without youtube metadata, or do you add it to a queue for later retrieval? the post could be deleted or the server could blow up in the meantime, so what sounds simple at first would add a degree of complexity to implement robustly

f3466 No.62312

>>62311
ok so you're saying the metadata cant just be obtained locally as with images. you need to communicate with youtube, either via their api or something like https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp#modifying-metadata and that could potentially fail or take longer than it normally takes to make a post. youtube might even be down entirely. and this makes it tricky

i dont know php so i can't really talk about how hard it would be. but the rest seems trivial, spoilering and (hide) options for youtube embeds

4bde3 No.62317

File: 1655753843396.png (264.77 KB, 500x500, 1:1, ok.png) ImgOps iqdb

>>62312
yes, that's my understanding (i could be completely wrong) the alternative is to embed every video so you can see the title, but that will make pages with tens or hundreds of embeds super slow. we can do this ourselves by going to options -> user js at the top right of the page and adding something like this (modified from https://wizchan.org/main.js:907):

$('div.video-container a').each(function() {
  var id = $(this.parentNode).data('video');

  $(this.parentNode).html
  (
    '<iframe style="float:left;margin:10px 20px" type="text/html" ' +
    'width="360" height="270" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/' + id +
    '?autoplay=0&html5=1" allowfullscreen frameborder="0"/>'
  );
});

you could do something similar for hiding embeds, but to add spoilers would need a change on the php side like you say



2cc28 No.62304[Reply]

I swear I used to be able to hide whole threads. It was nice being able to make the politics thread disappear :(.

16eba No.62305

File: 1655509720778.png (39.36 KB, 3210x570, 107:19, ht.png) ImgOps iqdb

[-]

2cc28 No.62307

Oh, I see, it doesn't work on /all/, just on the actual boards.

2cc28 No.62310

>>62305
Oh shit, NOW I see. I thought that was pointing to the box.

I honestly did not notice all the [-]s until now, they just blended into the background. Thanks.



2172d No.62287[Reply]

/lounge/ was a mistake. should have never existed to begin with. delete it right now

e7afc No.62288

k

2172d No.62289

>>62288
Im not joking it attracts crabs

e7afc No.62290

>>62289
good!!!



File: 1655074815818.png (185.46 KB, 1366x768, 683:384, 20220612_17h55m34s_grim.png) ImgOps iqdb

309a5 No.62272[Reply]

MODS! I understand keeping the blackpill and female sexuality threads up, but don't allow all these new crab visitors to just start infesting the site and derailing threads with unrelated blackpill v. redpill nonsense and discussions of what succs really want in a man.


e6b24 No.60657[Reply]

You can't discuss anything related to succubus in any form of media that is not negative or else people will disregard your post or its contents on the basis that it is not about succubus being bad.
even if you happen to dislike succubus and you watch a movie about succubus and try discuss it people will attack you.

Why are crabs not banned? they obviously want sex and are too scared to say it so they don't disclose what is obvious.
40 posts and 5 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

fcb17 No.62257

>>62247
>if wizards are above crabs then that makes wizards failed normalfags though, you gotta pick one kid
Crabs are failed normalfags, and wizards are above crabs in the sense of having overcome normalfaggotry itself. Wizards aren't even normalfags to begin with.

>>62254
>give me 5 reasons why you're a volcel without mentioning crabs or succubi, otherwise you're just a crab in denial
Oh, so you're a crab? Name 500 St*cies that have rejected you, otherwise you're just a ch*d volcel in denial.

5262a No.62258

>>62256
Sure there are non-succubus reasons to ignore succubi, like a hero on a mission who can't be distracted. Like how Spider-Man is always telling MJ that's why he can't be with her.

5262a No.62259

>>62258
But now that I think about it, even the most purewiz reason to be a volcel, non-succubus reasons, are still about succubi. Even if succubi are a distraction from some higher goal to be a Newton or Tesla of the mind, or Christian saint of the soul or Spider-Man Batman superhero.

Its still making a judgement about succubi. Its not a moral judgement about succubi being good or bad. But if you say you need to avoid the distraction of succubi, then you are saying succubi are distracting. Either in the temptations or the relationship itself. Or most distracting of all, having kids and settling down to a family.

So even avoiding succubi for a higher purpose, is still about succubi, you are saying they are distracting.

e1fca No.62260

>>62237
Based, thats gay as fuck.

d4710 No.62263

>>62259
The ancient philosophers went over this.



e52c3 No.62239[Reply]

>>>/dep/259981
>>>/dep/260098

so the imbecile(s?) with that syntax and writing style has/have been consistently posting the shittiest threads on every board for years

I know he (I am going to assume it's one single individual) has never broken any rule but his posts are so consistently egregious that I would hope his thread posting privileges would be revoked. Like, redirect the poor retard to the crawl threads or confine him to /b/, I don't know.

654c4 No.62240

>>62239
I think the second one would've been removed if discussion hadn't quickly happened. I think the mods are averse to removing such posts if some discussion does arise in them, because I did see an almost identical post that still didn't break any rules be quickly removed before it got any replies. So I guess the solution is just "report and ignore".

I don't think the first post is bad because it still leads to wizardly anti-crab discussion, which is not at all the case with the "Wizardry and the black pill" thread. The danger of that kind of thread is that wizards can get bogged down in arguing over the specific empirical issues and details of blackpill, redpill, etc., treating it as just "abstract rationalization" (see https://wizchan.org/wiz/res/189276.html#191607), and suddenly it's a 200-replies shithole full of crab theory walls of texts about nothing but succs, their minds, and 3d dating mechanics, where a signification portion of the posts are by actual crabs. That's what happens when you even allow discussions on crab theory to take place. To even have such a post up makes this site look like just another crab site. And it's such a disappointment that it's effectively the most active thread right now.

Compared to that I think that guy is a minor offense. Anyway, I'm for just removing the second thread. The discussion is pointless. It's just the guy being like an edgy teen and being insulted by everyone. No one wants that thread up.



297f4 No.62231[Reply]

I just got a 405 Not Allowed error when trying to report someone (the guy who admitted to be waiting to meet a "special someone" on the /lounge/ waifu thread). What does that mean? Did the report still happen or what?

87f39 No.62233

Did you try reporting from all instead of the thread's own page?

7f10b No.62234

>>62231
you get this error when you try report a mod. the universe is saying that this wizmod ought to be allowed to meet his special wizkid. i know this might hurt: but some wizards FUCK! get over it!

0214a No.62235

>>62233
Oh, that might've been it. I'll remember it next time.



16fbf No.62229[Reply]

dear wiz mods, i hope you are all going well. i hope your lives are happy and all ur goals come to fruition. thanks for keeping the wheels on the wiz bus turning. i think that i am a nice wiz imp and that further it is possible for me to knock over some pots and pans and get away with it. have a good day, wiz mods.

202f1 No.62230




a399e No.62209[Reply]

Hello, I have no connection to the 2d poster you banned from /b/ and you probably think of me as a horrible poster anyway.

I'd just like to suggest to the mods or admins that this poster be unbanned. I think their ban was unfair and they further make good contributions to the site. I like the staff and appreciate the work you all do. I just would like for us to keep things fair. Got to respect the community too.

Hope ur all going well, regards, wiz imp.
8 posts omitted. Click reply to view.

27e55 No.62219

>>62217
The guy in question has been posting about this on Feels, the image is not "3D run through a photoshop filter", it's just CG. If disgusting straight porn is enough to get banned just because it's disgusting then we need to ban the fags as well.

e8fa9 No.62222

>>62214
Permaban Joseph

7bead No.62227

>>62222
Take ur medication bro. Your schiszofrenia shows

9db40 No.62228

>>62219
It's the correct call, regardless, to lump in photo-realistic 3dcg with 3dpd.

55125 No.62238

>>62227
Piss off gangstalker demon



  [Go to top]   [Catalog]
Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[ Home ] [ wiz / dep / hob / lounge / jp / meta / games / music ] [ all ] [  Rules ] [  FAQ ] [  Search /  History ] [  Textboard ] [  Wiki ]