[ Home ] [ wiz / dep / hob / lounge / jp / meta / games / music ] [ all ] [  Rules ] [  FAQ ] [  Search /  History ] [  Textboard ] [  Wiki ]

/meta/ - Meta

Suggestions and Feedback
[]
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)
  [Go to bottom]  [Catalog]  [Reload]  [Archive]

File: 1656615634274.png (739.95 KB, 496x750, 248:375, 1595029220813.png) ImgOps iqdb

e8fa3 No.62342[Reply]

>Do not post 3D (real) pornography, or 3D content that is solely intended to arouse, attract or fawn over.

make it so the rules prohibit convincingly photorealistic computer generated content. dall-e 2 in particular can generate realistic photos of succubi. they aren't real succubi, but at a certain point it will become impossible to tell the difference so it makes sense to just ban them
9 posts and 4 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

caa4a No.62390

>>62387
Compositing images aren't a new thing and are already covered under the rule.

What you have posted aren't anything but composites of images that already fall under rule 7.
It would be like saying the rules should address if someone clips pictures out of a porno mag and paste them together should be explicitly mentioned in the rules.
They aren't even totally ai generated images, just edited mixes of already existing images.
It isn't photorealsitic computer generated content as mentioned in the OP. It is photos of succubi that have been edited and composited using a computer program.
So clearly not even the thing being talked about.
This is just a dishonest tactic by you to try to conflate two totally different things.

Editing a image using a computer program does not make it a photorealistic ai created cgi.

e8fa3 No.62391

>>62390
>Compositing images
>Editing a image
>It isn't photorealsitic computer generated content
>They aren't even totally ai generated images, just edited mixes of already existing images.
no. you don't understand GANs if you think those are simply edited images

there is no base image to be edited, they were algorithmically generated from scratch, using a pretrained model that learned off real images. that is the ENTIRE point of their usefulness, a magic computer program that can generate realistic enough media as its output. see https://thisxdoesnotexist.com/ for examples of other snowclones. if you still think these models are secretly storing millions or billions of bitmaps that it simply opens up and modifies each time to produce its output, the sort of data compression required to fit all those images into the small sizes of the pretrained models is impossible

>This is just a dishonest tactic by you to try to conflate two totally different things.
these are ai generated nudes and tits, exactly what the thread is about. do you have access to DALLE-2, something better? i sure don't, but that's the only real complaint, that they can be at times not photorealistic enough

caa4a No.62392

>>62391
They very much are just composite images and not wholly original as you claim.
I think it is you who have a poor understanding of the technology as it's something a human can do with photoshop and a catalog of preexisting images to draw from.

>. if you still think these models are secretly storing millions or billions of bitmaps that it simply opens up and modifies each time to produce its output, the sort of data compression required to fit all those images into the small sizes of the pretrained models is impossible
That isn't how the tech works and I am not sure why anyone would think that it would work that way.

Again it's a simple composite while using blends in a rather rough manner.
It only takes a folder of base images to work from and time using conventional a photo editor.
Automation of composite images isn't what is described in op.
Again you are trying to conflate two unalike things for the sake of a really retarded argument based on something you admit doesn't even exist and isn't currently a problem.

e8fa3 No.62393

>>62392
hmmm maybe i don't know these things are doing, i never thought they were storing image data but i do remember gan stuff does kinda morph between an input image into something else

does the dall-e shit not do this?

caa4a No.62405

>>62393
Read through most of the research paper that explains the tech.
It's full of jargon and written to be intentionally obtuse, but thankfully I still remember how to read such academic bullshit.
To summarize "Thisdoesnotexist" takes a random base "style" image and uses a combination of data sets and training data to morph it using blending techniques and randomization to modify the image into something unique.
For example adding freckles, changing the skin color, and blending the a fade between 2 other images that match up with the same pose while checking the training data to make sure the final image matches certain criteria.

Complicated and somewhat impressive as a tech demo but works fundamentally differently from how dall-e works (thankfully that research paper was easier to read).

Not that it matters to overall point of the thread.
Just really bored and though (in error) that reading CS research papers would be a good use of my time.


File: 1656123248173.png (20.23 KB, 701x391, 701:391, 66435.PNG) ImgOps iqdb

11578 No.62320[Reply]

Banned for calling Andrew a homosexual faggot that likes big hairy men.

                                   
30 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

72278 No.62400

>>62399
>no point
lol

1ae1e No.62401

>>62400
>no
!

72278 No.62402

>>62401
so how is breaking your own rules going for you? definitely reassuring posters that moderation is competent and impartial, no?

1ae1e No.62403

>>62402
I'm not a mod! I'm a user who follows the rules!

72278 No.62404

>>62403
lol good one


7c69e No.62377[Reply]

Can you please do something about the guy who spams youtube videos on /b/ every day?
2 posts omitted. Click reply to view.

76991 No.62381

why

65c09 No.62382


7c69e No.62383

>>62380
>>62381
There's a rule against spamming.

8eec5 No.62384

>>62380
>watch his videos to get edumucated and taste a bit of life
>this is what midwits actually believe

7ef85 No.62388

>HURR MY SANDCASTLE
*posts meta thread outside meta*
>DURRRRRRR NOOOO FUCK U DONT CRITICIZE ME…!!
*deletes b threads*
>HURR AND A DURR, WIZCHAN IS PERFECTLY FUNCTIONAL, DONT COMPLAIN ABOUT SITE GLITCHES, UNSPOKEN MOD ASSPAIN "CRISIS" RULES NOR UPHOLDING LISTED ONES
lmfao my ASS! i dont care if some rotten fag tranny said it first.


3b273 No.62361[Reply]

hello wiz mods, i am doing my nice imp dances to bring you good luck today ^_^

46d6b No.62365

Thanks!

73a6c No.62368

bootlicker matthew


10d8e No.62267[Reply]

Could the fact that wojak memes are banned please be mentioned in the rules page?
10 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.

c1382 No.62336

>>62335
https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/apu-apustaja
Googling shit yourself doesn't hurt, retard.

a18f1 No.62337

File: 1656514784550.jpeg (130.25 KB, 1024x768, 4:3, FWRNG6YUEAABlut.jpeg) ImgOps iqdb

>>62335

baa1f No.62338

File: 1656525836006.png (83.34 KB, 188x188, 1:1, sadfsadf.png) ImgOps iqdb

>>62337
this is some 'not all rectangles are quadrilateral' shit

38f45 No.62351

>>62336
fuck off with dumb normie shit, retard

d5503 No.62355

>>62337
I hate zoomers so much


File: 1656699896166.png (139.19 KB, 346x346, 1:1, 1651436014270.png) ImgOps iqdb

27b16 No.62685[Reply]

This board is fucking dying, what happened to half of the user base here? killed themselves???
87 posts and 4 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

14579 No.62773

everyone uses discord now, even people from here, imageboards are dying, these people use discord for "serious" discussions (i don't want to imagine what those are) so they use imageboards as a garbage bin to dump their shitposts into, that's why imageboards are not only dying but the quality of posts has been lowered significantly

56242 No.62774

>>62746
why dont you just go to a bar and chat up some ppl

d43fe No.62775

Normalfags and succubi post about "crabs" because they can't attack the two groups they obviously belong to. The change on the site to attacking male virgins "crabs" is enough proof that the real users left long ago. All that's left are the two groups who didn't belong here, but now run the site.

8b01e No.62776

>>62775
I'm still on this earth for a while longer but I raid crabs on sight to try to buy you wizzos time to retreat and gather supplies for a counter attack and make safe the website

d43fe No.62777

>>62776
I didn't ask for your input succubus.


88634 No.62326[Reply]

In general, I am amazed at how robust the ruleset is at keeping this place more or less for wizards. That said, I feel like more people on this board should know about rule 11. When people make a thread/post that obviously violates rules 1-4, and a load of posters reply with
>Wizchan 2022
>Current state of Wizchan
>Go back to /r9k/
How many of those replying posters are getting hit with a rule 11 warning to teach them wtf to do?

f1a9e No.62330

You'd have to expel them all in order to actually fulfill the rule.


File: 1655161714993.png (125.71 KB, 607x325, 607:325, ClipboardImage.png) ImgOps iqdb

c3d6b No.62278[Reply]

Someone made this post >>>/lounge/290675 of a business using the wojak meme. I replied to this post with another example of businesses using the wojak meme. My post was deleted and I was issued a warning, while the post that I replied to remains up. Please explain the rationale behind your decision to single out my post in particular while ignoring the person I replied to.
17 posts and 3 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

fcc7c No.62323

If it's against the rules to post these memes it should be an actual rule with a number.

1bfd2 No.62324

>>62323
>post wojak
>receive protests
>repost now with pepe
>gets ban
>uses vpn
>comes back
>repeat

>>62313
He mocks whoever claims life is about war… which actually demonstrating his point, lol.

59d18 No.62325

>>62323
It is. Get some basic reading comprehension.
"5: Do not submit low quality, inflammatory or off-topic posts."

1bfd2 No.62329

>>62325
I still dont get the point about getting butthurted by poor, innocent wojak

59d18 No.62340

>>62329
Learn to read you underage faggot. No one likes you insufferable retards.


File: 1655510623874.jpg (127.26 KB, 978x768, 163:128, 1552173936911.jpg) ImgOps iqdb

f3466 No.62306[Reply]

1. you know how images have the metadata?
>File (hide): 1419366981856.png (70.72 KB, 300x100, 3:1, wizzy2.png) ImgOps iqdb
why not youtube videos. can give some indication as to wtf the video is without having to click it. for example:
>Youtube (hide): https://youtube.com/YGEJKHGJEQRGH (10:53, 1920x1080, 16:9, How to embed a youtube video)

2. why not also add (hide) feature. currently you have to hide the entire post?

3. we should also be able to spoiler a youtube embed

4bde3 No.62311

>>62306
it'd involve reaching out to youtube (and the other places wizchon supports embedding from), which exposes you to a bunch of problems from how the internet is currently structured. if youtube doesn't respond do you simply permit a post without youtube metadata, or do you add it to a queue for later retrieval? the post could be deleted or the server could blow up in the meantime, so what sounds simple at first would add a degree of complexity to implement robustly

f3466 No.62312

>>62311
ok so you're saying the metadata cant just be obtained locally as with images. you need to communicate with youtube, either via their api or something like https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp#modifying-metadata and that could potentially fail or take longer than it normally takes to make a post. youtube might even be down entirely. and this makes it tricky

i dont know php so i can't really talk about how hard it would be. but the rest seems trivial, spoilering and (hide) options for youtube embeds

4bde3 No.62317

File: 1655753843396.png (264.77 KB, 500x500, 1:1, ok.png) ImgOps iqdb

>>62312
yes, that's my understanding (i could be completely wrong) the alternative is to embed every video so you can see the title, but that will make pages with tens or hundreds of embeds super slow. we can do this ourselves by going to options -> user js at the top right of the page and adding something like this (modified from https://wizchan.org/main.js:907):

$('div.video-container a').each(function() {
  var id = $(this.parentNode).data('video');

  $(this.parentNode).html
  (
    '<iframe style="float:left;margin:10px 20px" type="text/html" ' +
    'width="360" height="270" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/' + id +
    '?autoplay=0&html5=1" allowfullscreen frameborder="0"/>'
  );
});

you could do something similar for hiding embeds, but to add spoilers would need a change on the php side like you say


2cc28 No.62304[Reply]

I swear I used to be able to hide whole threads. It was nice being able to make the politics thread disappear :(.

16eba No.62305

File: 1655509720778.png (39.36 KB, 3210x570, 107:19, ht.png) ImgOps iqdb

[-]

2cc28 No.62307

Oh, I see, it doesn't work on /all/, just on the actual boards.

2cc28 No.62310

>>62305
Oh shit, NOW I see. I thought that was pointing to the box.

I honestly did not notice all the [-]s until now, they just blended into the background. Thanks.


  [Go to top]   [Catalog]
Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[ Home ] [ wiz / dep / hob / lounge / jp / meta / games / music ] [ all ] [  Rules ] [  FAQ ] [  Search /  History ] [  Textboard ] [  Wiki ]