[ Home ] [ wiz / dep / hob / lounge / jp / meta / games / music ] [ all ] [  Rules ] [  FAQ ] [  Search /  History ] [  Textboard ] [  Wiki ]

/meta/ - Meta

Suggestions and Feedback
[]
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

  [Go to bottom]  [Catalog]  [Reload]  [Archive]

File: 1659835765691.jpg (219.15 KB, 950x1343, 950:1343, 1657679582895.jpg) ImgOps iqdb

9d5e1 No.62480[Reply]

I remember reading it but I can't find it. It was about the future of wizchan and if wizchan would be dead in another 10 years

30bcf No.62481

yeah vaguely. after 9 years in tis pergatory all the threeafs i read blur together
>>>/meta/62415
you can look in the archive for /wiz/, for /lounge/ and /music/ even! if you're not a.. well.. you-know-what, you can search for words that made the thread title in your browser history. your visual novel succubus pic has pretty eyes.



ae17e No.60515[Reply]

Hear me out. Just because /b/ is off-topic it doesn't mean the rules of the site don't apply. He just spams his shitty videos in his own threads that nobody replies to. Or else he just hijacks someone else's thread to post garbage. Can't something be done about this faggot? Or is he one of the modclique's golden children and has immunity from moderation?
35 posts and 12 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

15019 No.61622

Who the fuck cares about /b/ posters should be temp banned and anyone who started a thread should be permanently banned before shutting it down completely

43a42 No.61628

>>61623
samefag

a2e3c No.61629

>>61620
>>61621
Put your tag on.

1d3ee No.61630

File: 1641320789903.gif (272.47 KB, 180x240, 3:4, EcstaticWildDarklingbeetle….gif) ImgOps iqdb

>>61629

How about you suck my balls?

9e41c No.62479

>>60521
Again, why aren't you deleting his videos when they're reported? You say here that you acknowledge that he's breaking the rules, IP hopping doesn't excuse you letting his posts stay up.



File: 1659681366598.png (355.36 KB, 800x450, 16:9, 1618966099963.png) ImgOps iqdb

6b91a No.62477[Reply]

when a thread goes over 300 it gets bump locked bot posts manage to infect it with spam. the game discovery thread has like a dozen spam posts on it going back 2 months or so, and i'm pretty sure a few months ago i reported other spam on it, so it's just continuously happening

some suggestions:
1. disable posts by ips with less then x posts in these bump locked threads
2. disable links posted in bump locked threads
3. disable links posted by ips with less then x posts when using sage feature

6b91a No.62478

another easier suggestion is to just block vpns for threads that reach the bump limit, can use whatever system meta is using. probably won't help as much as the others but it would be something



74dd5 No.62430[Reply]

Why is rule 5 not enforced on the politics thread?
2 posts omitted. Click reply to view.

a43a8 No.62449

Reminder that the politics thread was never meant to be permanent

fe528 No.62450

>>62449
Any suggestions for an alternative?

aa45f No.62459

It's only enforced when the faggot mods don't like you anyway. The politics thread is far from the only place that rule 5 is violated. I'm curious to what you personally consider to be in violation there anyway. I already have a hunch.

3e935 No.62469

Politics doesn't belong here in the first place. It's a subject exclusively engineered for underage fags and obnoxious culture war obsessed retards; and they will always try to forcefully shove their political obsession into every single thread and every single website, no exceptions.
Any website that has aspirations beyong being a mindless Twitter colony should ban politics and every insufferable fourteen-year-old who wants to flame about it.

eb547 No.62472

>>62469
>Politics doesn't belong here in the first place.
Say that to the mods. >>>/lounge/293030 is yet another /pol/thread and it is still up and going. Fucking hell, this site is kill.



97d01 No.62452[Reply]

Proof of janny abuse ring
https://0chan.life/pity
https://twitter.com/UndeadHeal


Took a lil while but I cracked the case finally after drawing the heat and getting set up by them as they set up so many others, we all won. Cept the fucking jannies.
I did it for more than just your site theyre on LCF, and 4chan as well CC and possibly more so thats why Im posting here, not cause I wanna invade spaces.

Peace out wiz-scouts.
Sorry Naught.

778bc No.62453

File: 1659345915551.png (428.43 KB, 600x582, 100:97, 469.png) ImgOps iqdb


d00c1 No.62454

>>62452
Leave meds slowly but firmly before your speech gets more incoherent as time passes

57e4e No.62458

>>62452
The power struggles across the chans are pretty funny, and it's no surprise they are riddled with transsexuals (historically homosexuals were also over-represented in middle management)



File: 1628813661957.jpg (71.44 KB, 491x750, 491:750, 1628808588180.jpg) ImgOps iqdb

e84bc No.60403[Reply]

Did the mods ever ban the trannyhomos on /b/? Last time I came here there was a war going on about them. I tended to agree with the "there's no such thing as a gay wizard" camp.
74 posts and 8 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

35a8e No.62419

>>62411
Live agent.

25371 No.62425

>>62413
Live agent.

abd75 No.62455

>>62413
When it is me, I usually give brief explanations about the "Grain brain" book.

You turbonormalroastie

abd75 No.62456

>>60403
>>60403
Man, you should have already realized what is actually happening with mods by that mere discovery.

e9aed No.62457

>>62455
lmao right



File: 1658647841386.png (794.57 KB, 1521x607, 1521:607, ey024n8ykkc91.png) ImgOps iqdb

dcdbb No.62420[Reply]

Understanding the Teen Brain

It doesn’t matter how smart teens are or how well they scored on the SAT or ACT. Good judgment isn’t something they can excel in, at least not yet.

The rational part of a teen’s brain isn’t fully developed and won’t be until age 25 or so.

In fact, recent research has found that adult and teen brains work differently. Adults think with the prefrontal cortex, the brain’s rational part. This is the part of the brain that responds to situations with good judgment and an awareness of long-term consequences. Teens process information with the amygdala. This is the emotional part.

In teens' brains, the connections between the emotional part of the brain and the decision-making center are still developing—and not always at the same rate. That’s why when teens have overwhelming emotional input, they can’t explain later what they were thinking. They weren’t thinking as much as they were feeling.

A Teen’s Brain Isn’t Fully Developed Until Age 25

Even though your teen is now as tall as you are it doesn’t mean that they have fully matured. Even though your teen may score high on the SAT or the ACT, it’s important to remember that a teen’s brain is still under development. In fact, if your child is a teenager, then you can bet that parts of their brain still need to grow and mature. For instance, there are obvious differences between the brains of adults and adolescents indicating that change, maturity, and transformation are still underway in teens.

Brains of Young Adults Not Fully Mature

At an age when Americans are first considered adults, their brains are still maturing, a new study suggests.


"The brain of an 18-year-old college freshman is still far from resembling the brain of someone in their mid-twenties," said Craig Bennett, a graduate student who was involved in the new research. "When do we reach adulthood? It might be much later than we traditionally think."
15 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.

9fd29 No.62444

I propose we all send want pics to the wiz mods with a timestamp and if theres not enough hair the wiz mods ban the wiz user

9163c No.62445

>>62444
The wiz boys in the lab have been working on penile biometrics for a while. They've said penile plethysmography and ultrasonography combined with electroencephalography data could provide a constant wand authentication while browsing the website.

The advances in-browser bluetooth device APIs has allowed the easy connecting to medical devices so the project is coming closer to reality. Plug and play wand authentication is no longer a pipe dream.

9fd29 No.62446

>>62445
this is a beautiful vision. i support this.

535fd No.62447

File: 1659020289621.jpg (136.04 KB, 956x808, 239:202, 1641826629414.jpg) ImgOps iqdb

>>62420
I'm just going to say this and hope that it makes enough sense to be understood.
You're on Wizardchan. You're on a website full of many, many exceptions to the rules as it is, as we all fly in the face of what's socially acceptable or appreciated. Age has never had anything to do with how we turned out, and I'm sure some of us undoubtedly knew as children that we'd end up like this (I know for a fact that I did).

Instead of trying to ban people based on their ages or focusing on that particular doomed idea, why not just ban people who make low quality threads and double down on that notion? It's far more productive, it's actually feasible, and you can actually tell when someone is being a low-effort nuisance who isn't interested in actually gelling with the community whatsoever and just uses this place as a garbage dumb away from their garbage dumps on 4chan and Reddit.

I understand the value of flying under the radar and keeping Wizardchan small but I don't think putting up even more regulations for posting is going to help, especially if they're as unrealistic as this. Surely in today's era, there are even more younger people like us solely because of the completely abhorrent social conditions? Why turn them away, as long as they're not using this place as their small-time /r9k/ or subreddit? Obviously, they should be 18+ but there's never been a way to verify that beyond someone outing themselves as being younger than that.

Besides, how many of us were actually that age when we started coming here? If I remember right, I was in my early 20s, and this place helped me through some very tough times. I'd hope we would be willing to keep extending such a helpful hand to a more and more disenfranchised, disenchanted youth.

b9dcd No.62448

>>62447
An actual reasonable post.



File: 1654993571107.jpg (173.91 KB, 877x914, 877:914, duce and friends.jpg) ImgOps iqdb

687ab No.62253[Reply]

bellissimo
9 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.62277

I removed the threads because I don't speak their languages so it's hard to moderate. Admin can decide whether to add an /int/ or not.

see:
>>>/staff/1132

189bf No.62353

>>62277
>Links to something that can't be accessed without having a staff login
Classic

35a02 No.62424

>>62277
this should be enforced again since more national threads are popping up again

cb0d5 No.62435

>>62424
But they're speaking English in them

a3907 No.62439

CALLING ALL WIZARD CHEFS!



File: 1656615634274.png (739.95 KB, 496x750, 248:375, 1595029220813.png) ImgOps iqdb

e8fa3 No.62342[Reply]

>Do not post 3D (real) pornography, or 3D content that is solely intended to arouse, attract or fawn over.

make it so the rules prohibit convincingly photorealistic computer generated content. dall-e 2 in particular can generate realistic photos of succubi. they aren't real succubi, but at a certain point it will become impossible to tell the difference so it makes sense to just ban them
9 posts and 4 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

caa4a No.62390

>>62387
Compositing images aren't a new thing and are already covered under the rule.

What you have posted aren't anything but composites of images that already fall under rule 7.
It would be like saying the rules should address if someone clips pictures out of a porno mag and paste them together should be explicitly mentioned in the rules.
They aren't even totally ai generated images, just edited mixes of already existing images.
It isn't photorealsitic computer generated content as mentioned in the OP. It is photos of succubi that have been edited and composited using a computer program.
So clearly not even the thing being talked about.
This is just a dishonest tactic by you to try to conflate two totally different things.

Editing a image using a computer program does not make it a photorealistic ai created cgi.

e8fa3 No.62391

>>62390
>Compositing images
>Editing a image
>It isn't photorealsitic computer generated content
>They aren't even totally ai generated images, just edited mixes of already existing images.
no. you don't understand GANs if you think those are simply edited images

there is no base image to be edited, they were algorithmically generated from scratch, using a pretrained model that learned off real images. that is the ENTIRE point of their usefulness, a magic computer program that can generate realistic enough media as its output. see https://thisxdoesnotexist.com/ for examples of other snowclones. if you still think these models are secretly storing millions or billions of bitmaps that it simply opens up and modifies each time to produce its output, the sort of data compression required to fit all those images into the small sizes of the pretrained models is impossible

>This is just a dishonest tactic by you to try to conflate two totally different things.

these are ai generated nudes and tits, exactly what the thread is about. do you have access to DALLE-2, something better? i sure don't, but that's the only real complaint, that they can be at times not photorealistic enough

caa4a No.62392

>>62391
They very much are just composite images and not wholly original as you claim.
I think it is you who have a poor understanding of the technology as it's something a human can do with photoshop and a catalog of preexisting images to draw from.

>. if you still think these models are secretly storing millions or billions of bitmaps that it simply opens up and modifies each time to produce its output, the sort of data compression required to fit all those images into the small sizes of the pretrained models is impossible

That isn't how the tech works and I am not sure why anyone would think that it would work that way.

Again it's a simple composite while using blends in a rather rough manner.
It only takes a folder of base images to work from and time using conventional a photo editor.
Automation of composite images isn't what is described in op.
Again you are trying to conflate two unalike things for the sake of a really retarded argument based on something you admit doesn't even exist and isn't currently a problem.

e8fa3 No.62393

>>62392
hmmm maybe i don't know these things are doing, i never thought they were storing image data but i do remember gan stuff does kinda morph between an input image into something else

does the dall-e shit not do this?

caa4a No.62405

>>62393
Read through most of the research paper that explains the tech.
It's full of jargon and written to be intentionally obtuse, but thankfully I still remember how to read such academic bullshit.
To summarize "Thisdoesnotexist" takes a random base "style" image and uses a combination of data sets and training data to morph it using blending techniques and randomization to modify the image into something unique.
For example adding freckles, changing the skin color, and blending the a fade between 2 other images that match up with the same pose while checking the training data to make sure the final image matches certain criteria.

Complicated and somewhat impressive as a tech demo but works fundamentally differently from how dall-e works (thankfully that research paper was easier to read).

Not that it matters to overall point of the thread.
Just really bored and though (in error) that reading CS research papers would be a good use of my time.



File: 1656123248173.png (20.23 KB, 701x391, 701:391, 66435.PNG) ImgOps iqdb

11578 No.62320[Reply]

Banned for calling Andrew a homosexual faggot that likes big hairy men.

                                   
30 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

72278 No.62400

>>62399
>no point
lol

1ae1e No.62401


72278 No.62402

>>62401
so how is breaking your own rules going for you? definitely reassuring posters that moderation is competent and impartial, no?

1ae1e No.62403

>>62402
I'm not a mod! I'm a user who follows the rules!

72278 No.62404

>>62403
lol good one



  [Go to top]   [Catalog]
Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[ Home ] [ wiz / dep / hob / lounge / jp / meta / games / music ] [ all ] [  Rules ] [  FAQ ] [  Search /  History ] [  Textboard ] [  Wiki ]